How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
1220 East Fairview, Carthage, MO 64836 (opens Google Maps) · Jasper County · (417) 358-9084· 95 certified beds · avg 85 residents/day · certified since Jan 1, 1997 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Showing the latest 3 of 19 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature. F-0804
The facility's quality committee — the internal group responsible for finding and fixing care problems — did not have the required members or did not meet at least every three months. F-0868
The facility did not give residents reasonable access to and privacy in using ways to communicate, such as phones, mail, and email. Residents have the right to stay in touch with the outside world privately. F-0576
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| May 9, 2025 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature. · F-0804 |
| May 9, 2025 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility's quality committee — the internal group responsible for finding and fixing care problems — did not have the required members or did not meet at least every three months. · F-0868 |
| May 9, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not give residents reasonable access to and privacy in using ways to communicate, such as phones, mail, and email. Residents have the right to stay in touch with the outside world privately. · F-0576 |
| May 9, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide activities that meet residents' needs and interests. Nursing homes must offer meaningful activity programs, not just leave residents idle. · F-0679 |
| May 9, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · F-0609 |
| May 9, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689 |
| Jul 17, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide basic life support, such as CPR, before emergency medical help arrived — care that's required when it matches the doctor's orders and the resident's own written wishes. · F-0678 |
| Jul 17, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Jul 17, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not give residents (and their representatives and the ombudsman, a state advocate for residents) proper advance notice before a transfer or discharge, including information about their right to appeal. · F-0623 |
| Jul 17, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not give the resident or their representative written notice of how long it would hold the resident's bed during a hospital stay or approved leave. · F-0625 |
| Jul 17, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · F-0641 |
| Jul 17, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time. · F-0759 |
| Jul 17, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication. · F-0760 |
| Jul 17, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not regularly inspect bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails for safety, or the rails and mattresses were not attached safely to the frames. · F-0909 |
| Feb 11, 2020 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft. These written safeguards are the foundation of resident protection. · F-0607 |
| Feb 11, 2020 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have enough fresh-air ventilation, whether through windows, mechanical systems, or both. · F-0923 |
| Feb 11, 2020 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it. · F-0697 |
| Feb 11, 2020 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility used bed rails without first trying safer alternatives, or without assessing the resident's safety risk, discussing the risks and benefits with the resident or family, getting consent, and installing the rails correctly. · F-0700 |
| Feb 11, 2020 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide appropriate treatment and services to residents with a mental health condition, difficulty adjusting emotionally, or a history of trauma or post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). · F-0742 |
Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (8 → 6).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | 5 | 0 | E |
| 2023 | 8 | 0 | E |
| 2025 | 6 | 0 | F |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Missouri avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.70 | 3.66 | 3.95 | top 44% in Missouri; bottom 47% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.42 | 0.49 | 0.69 | bottom 50% in Missouri; bottom 25% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 3.36 | 3.22 | 3.50 | top 40% in Missouri; top 49% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.28 | 0.33 | 0.48 | top 46% in Missouri; bottom 28% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 29.0 | 56.0 | 45.8 | top 3% in Missouri; top 13% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 25.0 | 47.8 | 42.9 | top 19% in Missouri; top 20% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.50, RN 0.39, weekend 3.18.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.50 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 3/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 1/5 · long-stay residents: 1/5 · short-stay residents: 1/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for St Luke's Nursing and Rehabilitation. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
Non profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brownell, Cari | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/04/2022 |
| Edds, Chuck | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2022 |
| Edds, Chuck | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2022 |
| Edds, Chuck | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2022 |
| Martindale, Rich | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2024 |
| Martindale, Rich | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2024 |
| Martindale, Rich | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2024 |
| McGuire, Larry | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2018 |
| McGuire, Larry | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2018 |
| McGuire, Larry | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2018 |
| McKee, Roger | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2022 |
| McKee, Roger | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2022 |
| McKee, Roger | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2022 |
| Pierjok, Joe | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2022 |
| Pierjok, Joe | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2022 |
| Pierjok, Joe | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2018 |
| Renshaw, Melinda | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/01/2024 |
| Rouse, Norman | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/01/2022 |
| Rouse, Norman | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/01/2022 |
| Rouse, Norman | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/01/2021 |
Showing 20 of 38 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 18 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aspire Senior Living Carthage | 0.3 mi | Carthage, MO | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Aspire Senior Living Webb City | 9.5 mi | Webb City, MO | ★☆☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Sarcoxie Health Care Center | 11.0 mi | Sarcoxie, MO | ★☆☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| NHC Healthcare, Joplin | 12.6 mi | Joplin, MO | ★★☆☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Joplin Gardens | 14.1 mi | Joplin, MO | ★☆☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Aspire Senior Living Joplin | 15.1 mi | Joplin, MO | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Granby House | 16.6 mi | Granby, MO | ★★☆☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Communities of Wildwood Ranch | 17.3 mi | Joplin, MO | ★★★★☆ | 5/5 | |
| Westgate | 17.3 mi | Joplin, MO | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Galena Nursing & Rehab Center | 19.1 mi | Galena, KS | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | abuse |
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 265661.
This page is the printable visit checklist. If your browser did not open the print dialog automatically, use File → Print (Ctrl/⌘-P).
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details