Missouri ›Carthage

St Luke's Nursing and Rehabilitation

Costs & paymentPlan a visit

1220 East Fairview, Carthage, MO 64836 (opens Google Maps) · Jasper County · (417) 358-9084· 95 certified beds · avg 85 residents/day · certified since Jan 1, 1997 · Medicare and Medicaid certified

Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →

4/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
inspected May 9, 2025
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
3.70
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

New to these records? How to read an inspection report →

Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5 · how star ratings work →

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.

Inspection findings in the public record

Showing the latest 3 of 19 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.

  1. F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread

    The facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature. F-0804

  2. F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread

    The facility's quality committee — the internal group responsible for finding and fixing care problems — did not have the required members or did not meet at least every three months. F-0868

  3. E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern

    The facility did not give residents reasonable access to and privacy in using ways to communicate, such as phones, mail, and email. Residents have the right to stay in touch with the outside world privately. F-0576

View all 19 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
May 9, 2025F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespreadThe facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature. · F-0804
May 9, 2025F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespreadThe facility's quality committee — the internal group responsible for finding and fixing care problems — did not have the required members or did not meet at least every three months. · F-0868
May 9, 2025E · Potential for more than minimal harm, patternThe facility did not give residents reasonable access to and privacy in using ways to communicate, such as phones, mail, and email. Residents have the right to stay in touch with the outside world privately. · F-0576
May 9, 2025E · Potential for more than minimal harm, patternThe facility did not provide activities that meet residents' needs and interests. Nursing homes must offer meaningful activity programs, not just leave residents idle. · F-0679
May 9, 2025D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · F-0609
May 9, 2025D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689
Jul 17, 2023E · Potential for more than minimal harm, patternThe facility did not provide basic life support, such as CPR, before emergency medical help arrived — care that's required when it matches the doctor's orders and the resident's own written wishes. · F-0678
Jul 17, 2023E · Potential for more than minimal harm, patternThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880
Jul 17, 2023D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not give residents (and their representatives and the ombudsman, a state advocate for residents) proper advance notice before a transfer or discharge, including information about their right to appeal. · F-0623
Jul 17, 2023D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not give the resident or their representative written notice of how long it would hold the resident's bed during a hospital stay or approved leave. · F-0625
Jul 17, 2023D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · F-0641
Jul 17, 2023D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time. · F-0759
Jul 17, 2023D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication. · F-0760
Jul 17, 2023D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not regularly inspect bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails for safety, or the rails and mattresses were not attached safely to the frames. · F-0909
Feb 11, 2020E · Potential for more than minimal harm, patternThe facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft. These written safeguards are the foundation of resident protection. · F-0607
Feb 11, 2020E · Potential for more than minimal harm, patternThe facility did not have enough fresh-air ventilation, whether through windows, mechanical systems, or both. · F-0923
Feb 11, 2020D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it. · F-0697
Feb 11, 2020D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility used bed rails without first trying safer alternatives, or without assessing the resident's safety risk, discussing the risks and benefits with the resident or family, getting consent, and installing the rails correctly. · F-0700
Feb 11, 2020D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not provide appropriate treatment and services to residents with a mental health condition, difficulty adjusting emotionally, or a history of trauma or post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). · F-0742

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (8 → 6).

Citations by recorded inspection yearPublished citation counts, not a quality score · Source: CMS, 2026-08-01
All citationsSerious citations (G–L)
2020
All citations: 5
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2023
All citations: 8
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2025
All citations: 6
Serious citations (G–L): 0

All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202050E
202380E
202560F

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

How to file a complaint about care →

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

What these staffing numbers mean →

Nurse time, in contextAdjusted hours per resident per day · Source: CMS, 2026-08-01
This facilityMissouri averageU.S. average
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)
This facility: 3.70
Missouri average: 3.66
U.S. average: 3.95
Registered Nurse hours
This facility: 0.42
Missouri average: 0.49
U.S. average: 0.69
Weekend total nurse staffing
This facility: 3.36
Missouri average: 3.22
U.S. average: 3.50

All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.

MeasureThis facilityMissouri avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.703.663.95top 44% in Missouri; bottom 47% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.420.490.69bottom 50% in Missouri; bottom 25% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.363.223.50top 40% in Missouri; top 49% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.280.330.48top 46% in Missouri; bottom 28% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)29.056.045.8top 3% in Missouri; top 13% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)25.047.842.9top 19% in Missouri; top 20% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.50, RN 0.39, weekend 3.18.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.50 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 3/5.

Quality measures: assessments & claims

Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.

Quality measures rating: 1/5 · long-stay residents: 1/5 · short-stay residents: 1/5

Costs & payment

Price evidence · separate from quality

No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for St Luke's Nursing and Rehabilitation. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.

Calculate a stay from a quote you receive

Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.

Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.

Before you compare prices

  • Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
  • Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
  • Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.

Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price

Who owns this facility

How to read ownership records →

Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →

Non profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Brownell, CariIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE11/04/2022
Edds, ChuckIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2022
Edds, ChuckIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2022
Edds, ChuckIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2022
Martindale, RichIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2024
Martindale, RichIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2024
Martindale, RichIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2024
McGuire, LarryIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2018
McGuire, LarryIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2018
McGuire, LarryIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2018
McKee, RogerIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2022
McKee, RogerIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2022
McKee, RogerIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2022
Pierjok, JoeIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2022
Pierjok, JoeIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2022
Pierjok, JoeIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2018
Renshaw, MelindaIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2024
Rouse, NormanIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE02/01/2022
Rouse, NormanIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE02/01/2022
Rouse, NormanIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE02/01/2021

Showing 20 of 38 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 18 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.

Questions to ask on your visit

Full visit checklist →

Print visit checklist

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

  • "Could I join residents for a meal to see the food quality and temperature for myself?"
  • "How does your quality committee work, and can you share an example of a problem it identified and fixed?"
  • "How can my family member make private phone or video calls, and can we see where?"
  • "Can I see this month's activities calendar, and what do you offer residents who can't leave their rooms?"
  • "When abuse or theft is suspected, who do you notify, how fast, and how do you inform the family?"
  • "What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
  • "Are staff on every shift trained and certified in CPR, and how do they know each resident's resuscitation wishes?"
  • "Who leads your infection prevention program, and how do you make sure staff follow practices like hand hygiene every day?"

Also worth asking anywhere

  • "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
  • "Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
  • "CMS reports 29% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
  • "The ownership record on file lists 38 owning or managing parties — who makes the decisions about staffing levels?"
  • "Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Aspire Senior Living Carthage0.3 miCarthage, MO★★★☆☆3/5
Aspire Senior Living Webb City9.5 miWebb City, MO★☆☆☆☆2/5
Sarcoxie Health Care Center11.0 miSarcoxie, MO★☆☆☆☆2/5
NHC Healthcare, Joplin12.6 miJoplin, MO★★☆☆☆3/5
Joplin Gardens14.1 miJoplin, MO★☆☆☆☆2/5
Aspire Senior Living Joplin15.1 miJoplin, MO★☆☆☆☆1/5
Granby House16.6 miGranby, MO★★☆☆☆3/5
Communities of Wildwood Ranch17.3 miJoplin, MO★★★★☆5/5
Westgate17.3 miJoplin, MO★★☆☆☆2/5
Galena Nursing & Rehab Center19.1 miGalena, KS★★☆☆☆2/5abuse

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Carthage →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 265661.

This page is the printable visit checklist. If your browser did not open the print dialog automatically, use File → Print (Ctrl/⌘-P).

Your research

Viewed & saved homes

Kept in this browser tab for this session. Choose to remember them only on a device you trust. Opening a record or comparison sends its usual page request.

Selected for comparison

Recently viewed

Prices entered in a cost worksheet stay on that page and are not saved. Privacy details