Antlers Manor
511 East Main, Antlers, OK 74523 · Pushmataha County · 133 certified beds · avg 36 residents/day · certified since Jul 7, 1997
Part of chain: BGM ESTATE (15 facilities, chain avg rating 1.8★)
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
Health inspection rating: ★☆☆☆☆1/5 · CMS overall rating: 1/5
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.
Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)
▲ Immediate jeopardy, repeated · May 18, 2026 · F-0656 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Why it matters: Without a complete, working care plan, important needs can slip through the cracks and no one is accountable for results.
Severity (K): A life-threatening or extremely dangerous situation affected several residents. Among the most serious findings an inspection can produce.
Corrected: Jun 8, 2026 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · May 18, 2026 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.
Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.
Corrected: Jun 8, 2026 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
All citations in the current public record (18)
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| May 18, 2026 | ▲ K · Immediate jeopardy, repeated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint |
| May 18, 2026 | ▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-off | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint |
| Mar 6, 2025 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. |
| Mar 6, 2025 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits. |
| Mar 6, 2025 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. |
| Nov 14, 2023 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not fully assess residents on time — a complete assessment of health, abilities, and needs is required when a resident is first admitted and at least once every 12 months after that. |
| Nov 14, 2023 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. |
| Nov 14, 2023 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility used bed rails without first trying safer alternatives, or without assessing the resident's safety risk, discussing the risks and benefits with the resident or family, getting consent, and installing the rails correctly. |
| Nov 14, 2023 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. |
| Nov 14, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. |
| Nov 14, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. |
| Nov 14, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not create and follow a basic care plan covering a new resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of admission. The first days are when a new resident is most vulnerable. |
| Jul 15, 2022 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. |
| Jul 15, 2022 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. |
| Jul 15, 2022 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. |
| Jul 15, 2022 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems. |
| Jul 15, 2022 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility hired someone with an official finding of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or theft against them. Facilities are not allowed to employ people with such findings. |
| Jul 15, 2022 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not coordinate resident assessments with the state's pre-admission screening program for mental illness and intellectual disabilities, or failed to refer residents for the special services they need. |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (7 → 3).
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 6 | 0 | E |
| 2023 | 7 | 0 | E |
| 2025 | 3 | 0 | E |
| 2026 | 2 | 2 | K ▲ |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
1 fine totaling $13,070.
| Date | Type | Amount / length |
|---|---|---|
| May 18, 2026 | Fine | $13,070 |
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
| Measure | This facility | Oklahoma avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.73 | 4.58 | 3.95 | bottom 10% in Oklahoma; bottom 48% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.62 | 0.41 | 0.69 | top 12% in Oklahoma; top 46% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 3.63 | 4.16 | 3.50 | bottom 20% in Oklahoma; top 36% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.42 | 0.28 | 0.48 | top 11% in Oklahoma; top 44% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 36.0 | 55.5 | 45.8 | top 9% in Oklahoma; top 26% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 0.0 | 53.6 | 42.9 | — |
Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 2.87, RN 0.47, weekend 2.79. Staffing rating: 4/5.
Self-reported quality measures
Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.
Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 2/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5
Who owns this facility
For profit - Limited Liability company
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BGM Estate LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 50% | 12/12/2025 |
| Gilbert Green Family Investments LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 50% | 12/29/2020 |
| Mitchell, Kelly | Individual | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 13% | 12/12/2025 |
| Mitchell, Marcinda | Individual | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 13% | 12/12/2025 |
| Mitchell, Robert | Individual | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 13% | 12/12/2025 |
| Philip M. Green Revocable Trust | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 6% | 12/12/2025 |
| Philip Marion Green Exempt Tr Cu Gilbert F Green Tr | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 18% | 12/12/2025 |
| Seay, Tiffany | Individual | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 6% | 12/12/2025 |
| Tabor, Angela | Individual | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 13% | 12/12/2025 |
| Tiffany Seay Exempt Tr | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 15% | 12/12/2025 |
| Advanced Wound Therapy | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2024 |
| Belt, Miranda | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/09/2024 |
| Ben, Melton | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/13/2008 |
| BGM Estate LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/12/2025 |
| Dickinson, Ester | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/24/2017 |
| Forvis Mazars LLP | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2010 |
| Gilbert Green Family Investments LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/12/2025 |
| Green, Philip | Individual | Individual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/14/2026 |
| Harjo, Misty | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/24/2024 |
| Mitchell, Kelly | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/12/2025 |
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "Can you show me an example care plan, and how are families included when it's created and updated?"
- "What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
- "What is your approach to psychiatric medications — how do you try non-drug options first and work to reduce doses over time?"
- "What did your most recent kitchen inspection find, and can I see how food is stored and prepared?"
- "How soon after admission is a full assessment completed, and how are the findings shared with the family?"
- "What alternatives do you try before using bed rails, and how do you involve families in that decision?"
- "Can you give me examples of how your staff protect residents' dignity in everyday care, like bathing and dressing?"
- "Who completes resident assessments here, and how do you check them for accuracy?"
- "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
- "Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"
Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Choctaw Nation Nursing Home | 1.4 mi | Antlers, OK | ★☆☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Elmbrook of Hugo | 15.7 mi | Hugo, OK | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | abuse |
| Homestead of Hugo | 17.9 mi | Hugo, OK | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 375313.