OklahomaPryor

Colonial Terrace Care Center

1320 Northeast 1st Place, Pryor, OK 74362 · Mayes County · 75 certified beds · avg 39 residents/day · certified since Apr 14, 1997

Part of chain: BGM ESTATE (15 facilities, chain avg rating 1.8★)

4/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
0.00
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (26)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Apr 16, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems.
Apr 16, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Jun 21, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away.
Jun 21, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist.
Jun 21, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time.
Jun 21, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Jun 21, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections.
Jun 21, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it.
Apr 11, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · from a complaint
May 17, 2023F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not have a registered nurse on duty at least 8 hours a day, or did not have a registered nurse serving full-time as director of nursing.
May 17, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
May 17, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility used bed rails without first trying safer alternatives, or without assessing the resident's safety risk, discussing the risks and benefits with the resident or family, getting consent, and installing the rails correctly.
May 17, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems.
May 17, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
May 17, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have a working program to monitor how antibiotics are used. Tracking antibiotic use helps make sure these drugs are given only when needed and remain effective.
May 17, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not regularly inspect bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails for safety, or the rails and mattresses were not attached safely to the frames.
May 17, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care.
May 17, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not properly complete the required screening (called PASARR) that identifies whether a person entering a nursing home has a mental illness or intellectual disability and needs specialized services.
May 17, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not create and follow a basic care plan covering a new resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of admission. The first days are when a new resident is most vulnerable.
May 17, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
May 17, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offWhen a resident had a planned discharge, the facility did not make sure the necessary information was communicated to the resident and to the doctors or facility taking over their care.
May 17, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.
May 17, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections.
May 17, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
May 17, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time.
May 17, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (6 → 2).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
2023170F
202470E
202620D

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityOklahoma avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)0.004.583.95
Registered Nurse hours0.000.410.69
Weekend total nurse staffing0.004.163.50
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.000.280.48
Total nursing staff turnover (%)55.055.545.8top 49% in Oklahoma; bottom 25% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)0.053.642.9

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 0.00, RN 0.00, weekend 0.00. Staffing rating: 1/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: 4/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Limited Liability company

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Angelus Holdings LLCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest13%12/12/2025
BGM Estate LLCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest38%11/01/2012
Mitchell, KellyIndividual5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest9%12/06/2021
Mitchell, MarcindaIndividual5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest9%12/06/2021
Mitchell, RobertIndividual5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest9%12/06/2021
Philip Marion Green Exempt Tr Cu Gilbert F Green TrOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest11%12/12/2025
Tabor, AngelaIndividual5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest9%12/06/2021
Tiffany Seay Exempt TrOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest14%12/12/2025
Angelus Holdings LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE12/12/2025
Belt, MirandaIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE12/09/2024
Blalock, RandyIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE10/05/2022
Brown, JackIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2019
Brown, JackIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2019
Coatney, JodiIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE02/01/2022
Coatney, JodiIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2025
Cooper-Krops, LenaIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE07/30/2024
Drywater, DecemberIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE05/31/2023
Gully, KathyIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE03/10/2023
Hunt, JanaIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE11/28/2022
Mitchell, KellyIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE12/06/2021

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Shady Rest Care Center2.5 miPryor, OK★★☆☆☆2/5
Parkhill North Nursing Home7.1 miSalina, OK★☆☆☆☆2/5
Meadowbrook Nursing Center9.4 miChouteau, OK★★☆☆☆1/5
Lane Nursing & Ventilator Care16.9 miInola, OK★☆☆☆☆2/5
Claremore Skilled Nursing and Therapy18.0 miClaremore, OK★★★☆☆3/5
Emerald Care Center Claremore19.4 miClaremore, OK★★☆☆☆2/5
Memory Care Center at Emerald19.4 miClaremore, OK★☆☆☆☆1/5abuse

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Pryor →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 375299.