New JerseyJersey City

Peace Care St Ann's

198 Old Bergen Road, Jersey City, NJ 07305 · Hudson County · 120 certified beds · avg 112 residents/day · certified since Oct 15, 1997

2/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
4.09
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 2/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (27)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Mar 9, 2026F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not conduct and document a facility-wide assessment of what staff, supplies, and resources it needs to care for its residents properly — during everyday operations, nights, weekends, and emergencies.
Mar 9, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs.
Mar 9, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft. These written safeguards are the foundation of resident protection.
Mar 9, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide required paperwork or notices about a resident's needs, their right to appeal a transfer or discharge, or the facility's bed-hold policy (how long a bed is saved during a hospital stay). · from a complaint
Mar 9, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · from a complaint
Mar 9, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Mar 9, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups.
Mar 9, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not reassess a resident after a significant change in their condition, such as a sudden decline in health. A full new assessment is required when a resident's condition changes in a major way.
Mar 9, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not enter each resident's assessment information into the required format and send it to the state within 7 days of completing the assessment, as the rules require.
Mar 9, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
Mar 9, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow.
Mar 9, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility used feeding tubes without a valid medical reason or the resident's agreement, or did not provide proper care to residents who have feeding tubes.
Mar 9, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make sure the resident's doctor reviewed their care and wrote, signed, and dated progress notes and orders at each required visit.
Mar 9, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents' medications free from unnecessary drugs. Residents should only take medicines they truly need, at the right dose, for a clear reason.
Mar 9, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Mar 9, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Mar 9, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not give all staff the required training on its quality improvement program — the internal system for finding problems and making care better.
Aug 21, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · from a complaint
Oct 17, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
Oct 17, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
Oct 17, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration.
Oct 17, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Nov 22, 2022F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Nov 22, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Nov 22, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow.
Nov 22, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist.
Nov 22, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not electronically submit complete and accurate staffing information to the government, based on payroll and other verifiable records.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (4 → 17).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202250F
202440D
202510D
2026170F

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityNew Jersey avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)4.093.883.95top 27% in New Jersey; top 36% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours1.090.670.69top 10% in New Jersey; top 12% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.833.533.50top 24% in New Jersey; top 28% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.940.500.48top 7% in New Jersey; top 7% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)37.839.745.8top 45% in New Jersey; top 31% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)32.337.742.9top 41% in New Jersey; top 33% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.91, RN 1.04, weekend 3.66. Staffing rating: 4/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5

Who owns this facility

Non profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Peace Care INCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%06/01/2016
Peace Ministries INCOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest100%06/01/2016
Backiel, ChristineIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE10/15/1997
Backiel, ChristineIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE06/30/2024
Backiel, ChristineIndividualTrustee of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE10/15/1997
Buccianti, SilvanaIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE06/30/2022
Buccianti, SilvanaIndividualTrustee of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE06/30/2022
Doren, ElizabethIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE06/30/2022
Doren, ElizabethIndividualTrustee of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE06/30/2022
Friends Services for the AgingOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2018
Moussa, GhiasIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/15/2025
National Lutheran INC.OrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2023
Peace Care INCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2016
Pharmaccurate, LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2025
Reyes, RobertIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2023
Reyes, RobertIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2023
Stever Advisors, LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE05/12/2023
Unidine CorportationOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE11/05/2013

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Acclaim Rehabilitation and Nursing Center0.6 miJersey City, NJ★★★★☆4/5
Bayonne University Hospital2.2 miBayonne, NJ★★★★★5/5
Peace Care St Joseph's3.1 miJersey City, NJ★★★★☆3/5
Alaris Health at Hamilton Park3.3 miJersey City, NJ★★★★☆4/5
Staten Island Care Center3.9 miStaten Island, NY★★★★★4/5
Optima Care Harborview4.0 miJersey City, NJ★★★☆☆2/5
Verrazano Nursing and Post-Acute Center4.3 miStaten Island, NY★★☆☆☆3/5
Silver Lake Specialized Rehabilitation and Care Ce4.3 miStaten Island, NY★★☆☆☆2/5
Hoboken University Medical Center Tcu4.4 miHoboken, NJ★★★★★4/5
Cobble Hill Health Center INC5.1 miBrooklyn, NY★★★★☆3/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Jersey City →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 315413.