How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
121 Walnut Bottom Road, Shippensburg, PA 17257 (opens Google Maps) · Cumberland County · (717) 530-8300· 125 certified beds · avg 110 residents/day · certified since Oct 11, 1995 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Showing the latest 3 of 13 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not provide care that took into account residents' past trauma or their cultural backgrounds. Care is supposed to be sensitive to what residents have lived through and where they come from. F-0699
The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. F-0641
The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. F-0657
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 23, 2026 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide care that took into account residents' past trauma or their cultural backgrounds. Care is supposed to be sensitive to what residents have lived through and where they come from. · F-0699 |
| Apr 23, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · F-0641 |
| Apr 23, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · F-0657 |
| Feb 2, 2026 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint · F-0684 |
| Feb 2, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not honor residents' right to share a room with their spouse or a roommate of their choosing, or moved residents to a different room without written notice beforehand. · from a complaint · F-0559 |
| May 16, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| May 16, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · F-0684 |
| May 16, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility's quality committee — the internal group responsible for finding and fixing care problems — did not have the required members or did not meet at least every three months. · F-0868 |
| Jun 13, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · F-0641 |
| Jun 13, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · F-0657 |
| Jun 13, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · F-0684 |
| Jun 13, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide care that took into account residents' past trauma or their cultural backgrounds. Care is supposed to be sensitive to what residents have lived through and where they come from. · F-0699 |
| Aug 17, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft. These written safeguards are the foundation of resident protection. · from a complaint · F-0607 |
Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (3 → 3).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 1 | 0 | E |
| 2024 | 4 | 0 | D |
| 2025 | 3 | 0 | E |
| 2026 | 5 | 0 | E |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Pennsylvania avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.93 | 3.94 | 3.95 | top 40% in Pennsylvania; top 43% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.58 | 0.80 | 0.69 | bottom 39% in Pennsylvania; bottom 49% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 3.67 | 3.58 | 3.50 | top 36% in Pennsylvania; top 34% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.30 | 0.56 | 0.48 | bottom 22% in Pennsylvania; bottom 33% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | — | 44.5 | 45.8 | — |
| RN turnover (%) | — | 39.9 | 42.9 | — |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.56, RN 0.52, weekend 3.33.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.56 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 2/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 3/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Shippensburg Rehabilitation and Health Care Center. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Limited Liability company
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BL Panho Trust | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 06/01/2022 |
| Gottesman, Daniel | Individual | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 06/01/2022 |
| Kolman, Robert | Individual | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 06/01/2022 |
| Mlspa LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 06/01/2022 |
| Mlspa Trust | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 06/01/2022 |
| MVRK I LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 06/01/2022 |
| Panho Capital Group LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 06/01/2022 |
| Shippensburg Opco Holdco, LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 100% | 06/01/2022 |
| Cottle, Larry | Individual | W-2 Managing Employee | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2022 |
| Kolman, Robert | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2022 |
| Premier Management Support LLC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2022 |
All 11 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Swaim Health Center | 8.5 mi | Newville, PA | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Concordia at Spiritrust Luther Ridge | 8.5 mi | Chambersburg, PA | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Brookview Health Care Center | 9.8 mi | Chambersburg, PA | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Menno Haven Rehabilitation Center | 10.2 mi | Chambersburg, PA | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Chambers Pointe Health Care Center | 11.0 mi | Chambersburg, PA | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | abuse |
| Paramount Nursing and Rehab at Fayetteville, LLC | 11.4 mi | Fayetteville, PA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Laurel Lakes Rehabilitation and Wellness Center | 11.4 mi | Chambersburg, PA | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Transitions Healthcare Shook Home | 12.2 mi | Chambersburg, PA | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Chambersburg Skilled Nursing and Rehabilitation Ce | 12.9 mi | Chambersburg, PA | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | abuse |
| South Mountain Restoration Cen | 15.6 mi | South Mountain, PA | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Cumberland Crossings Retirement Community | 17.5 mi | Carlisle, PA | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Carlisle Skilled Nursing and Rehabilitation Center | 17.6 mi | Carlisle, PA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | SFF |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
CMS records place this facility in Cumberland, PA — 17 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 395964.
This page is the printable visit checklist. If your browser did not open the print dialog automatically, use File → Print (Ctrl/⌘-P).
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details