PennsylvaniaChambersburg

Chambers Pointe Health Care Center

1425 Philadelphia Avenue, Chambersburg, PA 17201 · Franklin County · 50 certified beds · avg 47 residents/day · certified since Dec 29, 1994

Abuse citation flag (CMS)

The abuse flag means inspectors cited this facility for abuse that caused harm to a resident within the past year, or potential for harm in each of the last two years. Source: CMS.

2/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
3
Serious findings on record
$15,593
Fines, last 3 years
5.09
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Aug 4, 2025 · F-0600 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.

Why it matters: Abuse and neglect cause direct physical and emotional harm and are among the most serious failures a nursing home can have.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Sep 12, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Nov 29, 2023 · F-0656 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.

Why it matters: Without a complete, working care plan, important needs can slip through the cracks and no one is accountable for results.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Jan 3, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Nov 29, 2023 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Jan 3, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (18)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Mar 25, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility gave residents unnecessary mind-altering (psychotropic) medications, or used drugs in a way that restrained residents by dulling their ability to think, move, or function.
Mar 25, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature.
Mar 25, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Mar 25, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Aug 4, 2025▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
Feb 28, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs.
Feb 28, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
Feb 28, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it.
Aug 5, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make sure special medical diets — like low-sodium or diabetic diets — were properly ordered by the resident's doctor or managed by a qualified dietitian as state law allows. · from a complaint
Mar 13, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature.
Mar 13, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Mar 13, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not honor residents' right to voice complaints without discrimination or retaliation, or did not have a working complaint process that resolves issues promptly.
Mar 13, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems.
Mar 13, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not give residents (and their representatives and the ombudsman, a state advocate for residents) proper advance notice before a transfer or discharge, including information about their right to appeal.
Mar 13, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
Mar 13, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Nov 29, 2023▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint
Nov 29, 2023▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (3 → 4).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202322G ▲
202480F
202541G ▲
202640E

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

2 fines totaling $15,593.

DateTypeAmount / length
Nov 29, 2023Fine$7,796
Nov 29, 2023Fine$7,797

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityPennsylvania avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)5.093.943.95top 12% in Pennsylvania; top 12% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours1.030.800.69top 18% in Pennsylvania; top 14% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing4.513.583.50top 12% in Pennsylvania; top 12% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.880.560.48top 13% in Pennsylvania; top 9% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)58.644.545.8bottom 14% in Pennsylvania; bottom 18% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)43.839.942.9bottom 40% in Pennsylvania; bottom 46% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.81, RN 0.98, weekend 4.27. Staffing rating: 4/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5

Who owns this facility

Non profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Beins, RogerIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2017
Fritz, RyanIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2023
George, CarolynIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2022
Gingrich, CharleneIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2019
Gipe, RonaldIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE05/23/2022
Macbride, LynnIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2019
Manufacturers and Trades Trust CompanyOrganization5% or Greater Mortgage InterestNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2018
Martin, TiffanyIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2023
Nelson, CharlesIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE04/03/2006
O'Donnell, PatrickIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2021
Peterson, ToddIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2024
Sciamanna, DavidIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2025
Starliper, DonnaIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/06/2025
Trinh, SuzanneIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2021
Warner, PaulaIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2022
Williams, AnthonyIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2024
Yeager, WayneIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2025

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Menno Haven Rehabilitation Center0.9 miChambersburg, PA★★★★★4/5
Brookview Health Care Center1.2 miChambersburg, PA★★★★☆3/5
Transitions Healthcare Shook Home1.3 miChambersburg, PA★★★☆☆2/5
Laurel Lakes Rehabilitation and Wellness Center1.8 miChambersburg, PA★★☆☆☆2/5
Chambersburg Skilled Nursing and Rehabilitation Ce2.5 miChambersburg, PA★★☆☆☆2/5abuse
Concordia at Spiritrust Luther Ridge4.2 miChambersburg, PA★★★☆☆3/5
Quincy Retirement Community11.0 miWaynesboro, PA★★★★☆4/5
Shippensburg Rehabilitation and Health Care Center11.0 miShippensburg, PA★★★★☆4/5
Paramount Nursing and Rehab at Fayetteville, LLC11.5 miFayetteville, PA★☆☆☆☆1/5
South Mountain Restoration Cen12.3 miSouth Mountain, PA★★★★★5/5
Complete Care at Hagerstown17.5 miHagerstown, MD★☆☆☆☆1/5
Fulton County Medical Center19.1 miMcConnellsburg, PA★★☆☆☆2/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Chambersburg →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 395944.