210 South Adair, Pryor, OK 74361 (opens Google Maps) · Mayes County · (918) 825-4455· 65 certified beds · avg 31 residents/day · certified since Mar 2, 1998 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: BGM ESTATE (15 facilities, chain avg rating 1.8★)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 2/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
▲ Immediate jeopardy, isolated · Jul 9, 2025 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.
Severity (J): Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety was cited. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Jun 19, 2025 (Past Non-Compliance)
Showing the latest 3 of 22 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint F-0689
The facility did not provide each resident with a nourishing, tasty, well-balanced diet that meets their daily nutritional and special dietary needs. · from a complaint F-0800
The facility did not employ enough qualified food and nutrition staff, including a qualified dietician, to properly run its food service. · from a complaint F-0801
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Jul 9, 2025 | ▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint · F-0689 |
| Aug 29, 2024 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not provide each resident with a nourishing, tasty, well-balanced diet that meets their daily nutritional and special dietary needs. · from a complaint · F-0800 |
| Aug 29, 2024 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not employ enough qualified food and nutrition staff, including a qualified dietician, to properly run its food service. · from a complaint · F-0801 |
| Aug 29, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care. · F-0578 |
| Aug 29, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · from a complaint · F-0584 |
| Aug 29, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| Aug 29, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · from a complaint · F-0657 |
| Aug 29, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not keep all essential equipment working safely — things like heating and cooling systems, kitchen equipment, and medical devices. · F-0908 |
| Aug 29, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away. · F-0580 |
| Aug 29, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not fully assess residents on time — a complete assessment of health, abilities, and needs is required when a resident is first admitted and at least once every 12 months after that. · F-0636 |
| Aug 29, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits. · F-0758 |
| Aug 29, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide food that accounts for each resident's allergies, intolerances, and personal preferences, or did not offer appealing alternatives. · from a complaint · F-0806 |
| Aug 6, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · from a complaint · F-0584 |
| Jul 27, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not give residents (and their representatives and the ombudsman, a state advocate for residents) proper advance notice before a transfer or discharge, including information about their right to appeal. · F-0623 |
| Jul 27, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · F-0641 |
| Jul 27, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | When a resident had a planned discharge, the facility did not make sure the necessary information was communicated to the resident and to the doctors or facility taking over their care. · F-0661 |
| Jul 27, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · F-0755 |
| Nov 28, 2022 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care. · F-0578 |
| Nov 28, 2022 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Nov 28, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not give residents proper notice about what Medicare or Medicaid covers, or about charges the resident might owe for services that aren't covered. · F-0582 |
| Nov 28, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | When a resident had a planned discharge, the facility did not make sure the necessary information was communicated to the resident and to the doctors or facility taking over their care. · F-0661 |
| Nov 28, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration. · F-0692 |
Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (4 → 11).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 5 | 0 | E |
| 2023 | 4 | 0 | E |
| 2024 | 12 | 0 | F |
| 2025 | 1 | 1 | J ▲ |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
1 fine totaling $14,069.
Every penalty CMS publishes for this facility in the 3-year window is listed —none excluded. The count and the dollar total come from two different CMS datasets and agree for this facility. Penalties older than the window are dropped by CMS before publication, not by us.
| Date | Type | Amount / length |
|---|---|---|
| Jul 9, 2025 | Fine | $14,069 |
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Oklahoma avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 5.45 | 4.58 | 3.95 | top 13% in Oklahoma; top 8% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.39 | 0.41 | 0.69 | top 48% in Oklahoma; bottom 20% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 5.42 | 4.16 | 3.50 | top 5% in Oklahoma; top 4% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.28 | 0.28 | 0.48 | top 38% in Oklahoma; bottom 28% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 57.1 | 55.5 | 45.8 | bottom 47% in Oklahoma; bottom 21% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | — | 53.6 | 42.9 | — |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.89, RN 0.27, weekend 3.86.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.89 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 3/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 2/5 · long-stay residents: 2/5 · short-stay residents: —/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Shady Rest Care Center. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Limited Liability company
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Angelus Holdings LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 13% | 12/12/2025 |
| BGM Estate LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 38% | 12/15/2011 |
| Mitchell, Kelly | Individual | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 9% | 12/06/2011 |
| Mitchell, Marcinda | Individual | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 9% | 12/15/2011 |
| Mitchell, Robert | Individual | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 9% | 12/15/2011 |
| Philip M. Green Revocable Trust | Organization | Direct Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/12/2025 |
| Philip Marion Green Exempt Tr Cu Gilbert F Green Tr | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 11% | 12/12/2025 |
| Tabor, Angela | Individual | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 9% | 12/15/2011 |
| Tiffany Seay Exempt Tr | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 14% | 12/12/2025 |
| Angelus Holdings LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/12/2025 |
| Belt, Miranda | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/09/2024 |
| Brown, Jack | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/01/2019 |
| Brown, Jack | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/01/2019 |
| Lowrimore, Morgan | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/07/2025 |
| Lowrimore, Morgan | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/18/2025 |
| Mitchell, Kelly | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/06/2011 |
| Mitchell, Marcinda | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/15/2011 |
| Mitchell, Robert | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/15/2011 |
| Philip M. Green Revocable Trust | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/12/2025 |
| Philip Marion Green Exempt Tr Cu Gilbert F Green Tr | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/12/2025 |
Showing 20 of 24 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 4 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.
CMS lists this facility under the chain BGM Estate — 15 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 14 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Colonial Terrace Care Center | 2.5 mi | Pryor, OK | ★★★☆☆ | 4/5 | |
| Meadowbrook Nursing Center | 8.4 mi | Chouteau, OK | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Parkhill North Nursing Home | 9.6 mi | Salina, OK | ★☆☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Lane Nursing & Ventilator Care | 14.8 mi | Inola, OK | ★☆☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Claremore Skilled Nursing and Therapy | 15.5 mi | Claremore, OK | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Emerald Care Center Claremore | 16.9 mi | Claremore, OK | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Memory Care Center at Emerald | 17.0 mi | Claremore, OK | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 375334.
This page is the printable visit checklist. If your browser did not open the print dialog automatically, use File → Print (Ctrl/⌘-P).
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details