OklahomaPryor

Shady Rest Care Center

210 South Adair, Pryor, OK 74361 · Mayes County · 65 certified beds · avg 31 residents/day · certified since Mar 2, 1998

Part of chain: BGM ESTATE (15 facilities, chain avg rating 1.8★)

2/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
1
Serious findings on record
$14,069
Fines, last 3 years
5.45
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 2/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Jul 9, 2025 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

Corrected: Jun 19, 2025 (Past Non-Compliance)

All citations in the current public record (22)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Jul 9, 2025▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Aug 29, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not provide each resident with a nourishing, tasty, well-balanced diet that meets their daily nutritional and special dietary needs. · from a complaint
Aug 29, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not employ enough qualified food and nutrition staff, including a qualified dietician, to properly run its food service. · from a complaint
Aug 29, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care.
Aug 29, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · from a complaint
Aug 29, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Aug 29, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · from a complaint
Aug 29, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not keep all essential equipment working safely — things like heating and cooling systems, kitchen equipment, and medical devices.
Aug 29, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away.
Aug 29, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not fully assess residents on time — a complete assessment of health, abilities, and needs is required when a resident is first admitted and at least once every 12 months after that.
Aug 29, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits.
Aug 29, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide food that accounts for each resident's allergies, intolerances, and personal preferences, or did not offer appealing alternatives. · from a complaint
Aug 6, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · from a complaint
Jul 27, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not give residents (and their representatives and the ombudsman, a state advocate for residents) proper advance notice before a transfer or discharge, including information about their right to appeal.
Jul 27, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
Jul 27, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offWhen a resident had a planned discharge, the facility did not make sure the necessary information was communicated to the resident and to the doctors or facility taking over their care.
Jul 27, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist.
Nov 28, 2022E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care.
Nov 28, 2022E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Nov 28, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not give residents proper notice about what Medicare or Medicaid covers, or about charges the resident might owe for services that aren't covered.
Nov 28, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offWhen a resident had a planned discharge, the facility did not make sure the necessary information was communicated to the resident and to the doctors or facility taking over their care.
Nov 28, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (4 → 11).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202250E
202340E
2024120F
202511J ▲

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

1 fine totaling $14,069.

DateTypeAmount / length
Jul 9, 2025Fine$14,069

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityOklahoma avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)5.454.583.95top 13% in Oklahoma; top 8% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.390.410.69top 48% in Oklahoma; bottom 20% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing5.424.163.50top 5% in Oklahoma; top 4% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.280.280.48top 38% in Oklahoma; bottom 28% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)57.155.545.8bottom 47% in Oklahoma; bottom 21% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)0.053.642.9

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.89, RN 0.27, weekend 3.86. Staffing rating: 3/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 2/5 · long-stay residents: 2/5 · short-stay residents: —/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Limited Liability company

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Angelus Holdings LLCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest13%12/12/2025
BGM Estate LLCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest38%12/15/2011
Mitchell, KellyIndividual5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest9%12/06/2011
Mitchell, MarcindaIndividual5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest9%12/15/2011
Mitchell, RobertIndividual5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest9%12/15/2011
Philip M. Green Revocable TrustOrganizationDirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE12/12/2025
Philip Marion Green Exempt Tr Cu Gilbert F Green TrOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest11%12/12/2025
Tabor, AngelaIndividual5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest9%12/15/2011
Tiffany Seay Exempt TrOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest14%12/12/2025
Angelus Holdings LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE12/12/2025
Belt, MirandaIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE12/09/2024
Brown, JackIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2019
Brown, JackIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2019
Lowrimore, MorganIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE10/07/2025
Lowrimore, MorganIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE12/18/2025
Mitchell, KellyIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE12/06/2011
Mitchell, MarcindaIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE12/15/2011
Mitchell, RobertIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE12/15/2011
Philip M. Green Revocable TrustOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE12/12/2025
Philip Marion Green Exempt Tr Cu Gilbert F Green TrOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE12/12/2025

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Colonial Terrace Care Center2.5 miPryor, OK★★★☆☆4/5
Meadowbrook Nursing Center8.4 miChouteau, OK★★☆☆☆1/5
Parkhill North Nursing Home9.6 miSalina, OK★☆☆☆☆2/5
Lane Nursing & Ventilator Care14.8 miInola, OK★☆☆☆☆2/5
Claremore Skilled Nursing and Therapy15.5 miClaremore, OK★★★☆☆3/5
Emerald Care Center Claremore16.9 miClaremore, OK★★☆☆☆2/5
Memory Care Center at Emerald17.0 miClaremore, OK★☆☆☆☆1/5abuse

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Pryor →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 375334.