1 Abele Drive, Clifton Park, NY 12065 (opens Google Maps) · Saratoga County · (518) 371-1400· 120 certified beds · avg 117 residents/day · certified since Feb 15, 1994 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: TRINITY HEALTH (19 facilities, chain avg rating 3.3★)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★☆☆☆☆1/5 · CMS overall rating: 1/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Showing the latest 3 of 24 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint F-0600
The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint F-0656
The facility allowed residents to lose the ability to do daily activities — like bathing, dressing, and eating — when there was no medical reason for the decline. Good care helps residents keep the abilities they have. F-0676
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 4, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint · F-0600 |
| Mar 4, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint · F-0656 |
| Mar 4, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility allowed residents to lose the ability to do daily activities — like bathing, dressing, and eating — when there was no medical reason for the decline. Good care helps residents keep the abilities they have. · F-0676 |
| Mar 4, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · F-0695 |
| Mar 4, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · from a complaint · F-0761 |
| Mar 4, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide residents with enough to drink, or with drinks matching their needs and preferences, to keep them properly hydrated. · F-0807 |
| Mar 4, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Mar 4, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Mar 4, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · F-0550 |
| Mar 4, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not coordinate resident assessments with the state's pre-admission screening program for mental illness and intellectual disabilities, or failed to refer residents for the special services they need. · F-0644 |
| Mar 4, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · F-0657 |
| Mar 4, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · F-0677 |
| Mar 4, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689 |
| Mar 4, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide routine dental care and 24-hour emergency dental care for residents. · F-0790 |
| Mar 4, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away. · from a complaint · F-0580 |
| Mar 4, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint · F-0609 |
| Mar 4, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · from a complaint · F-0610 |
| Mar 4, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint · F-0684 |
| Mar 4, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · from a complaint · F-0842 |
| Aug 4, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint · F-0600 |
| Aug 4, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint · F-0609 |
| Aug 4, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · from a complaint · F-0610 |
| Dec 31, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not give residents (and their representatives and the ombudsman, a state advocate for residents) proper advance notice before a transfer or discharge, including information about their right to appeal. · F-0623 |
| Dec 31, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not give the resident or their representative written notice of how long it would hold the resident's bed during a hospital stay or approved leave. · F-0625 |
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 2 | 0 | D |
| 2023 | 3 | 0 | E |
| 2025 | 19 | 0 | E |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
0 fines totaling $0, plus 1 Medicare payment denial period.
Every penalty CMS publishes for this facility in the 3-year window is listed —none excluded. The count and the dollar total come from two different CMS datasets and agree for this facility. Penalties older than the window are dropped by CMS before publication, not by us.
| Date | Type | Amount / length |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 4, 2025 | Payment Denial | 15 days from Jun 4, 2025 |
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | New York avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.98 | 3.58 | 3.95 | top 26% in New York; top 40% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.65 | 0.68 | 0.69 | top 38% in New York; top 42% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 3.50 | 3.13 | 3.50 | top 24% in New York; top 42% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.31 | 0.48 | 0.48 | bottom 40% in New York; bottom 33% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 48.7 | 40.3 | 45.8 | bottom 29% in New York; bottom 40% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 33.3 | 39.8 | 42.9 | top 38% in New York; top 33% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.92, RN 0.64, weekend 3.44.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.92 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 4/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Seton Health at Schuyler Ridge Residential H C. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
Non profit - Other
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| St Peters Health Partners | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 100% | 10/01/2011 |
| Bakar, Melissa | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2025 |
| Bala, Guha | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/01/2022 |
| Broughton, Jodie | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/28/1994 |
| Burke, Michael | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/01/2020 |
| Burke, Michael | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/01/2020 |
| Ducreay, Karen | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/10/2024 |
| Farrell, Eric | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2023 |
| Farrell, Eric | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2023 |
| Gupta, Renu | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2024 |
| Gupta, Renu | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2024 |
| Hanks, Steven | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2023 |
| Hanks, Steven | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2023 |
| Ilgner, Kamryn | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2023 |
| Ilgner, Kamryn | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2023 |
| Isacksen, Daniel | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/01/2022 |
| Isacksen, Daniel | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/01/2011 |
| Jimino, Kathleen | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/05/2022 |
| Lapczynski, Patricia | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2025 |
| Marshall, John | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/05/2022 |
Showing 20 of 38 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 18 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.
CMS lists this facility under the chain Trinity Health — 19 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 18 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Glendale Home-Schdy Cnty Dept Social Services | 6.5 mi | Scotia, NY | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Pathways Nursing and Rehabilitation Center | 6.5 mi | Niskayuna, NY | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Eddy Village Green | 7.3 mi | Cohoes, NY | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Troy Victorian Rehabilitation & Nursing Care CNTR | 8.0 mi | Troy, NY | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | SFF |
| Shaker Place Rehabilitation and Nursing Center | 8.8 mi | Albany, NY | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Baptist Health Nursing and Rehabilitation Center | 9.2 mi | Scotia, NY | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Kingsway Arms Nursing Center INC | 9.2 mi | Schenectady, NY | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Schenectady Center for Rehabilitation and Nursing | 9.3 mi | Schenectady, NY | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Eddy Memorial Geriatric Center | 10.8 mi | Troy, NY | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Eddy Heritage House Nursing and Rehabilitation Ctr | 11.2 mi | Troy, NY | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuseSFF |
| Daughters of Sarah Nursing Center | 12.5 mi | Albany, NY | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Teresian House Nursing Home Co INC | 12.5 mi | Albany, NY | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
CMS records place this facility in Saratoga, NY — 2 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 335774.
This page is the printable visit checklist. If your browser did not open the print dialog automatically, use File → Print (Ctrl/⌘-P).
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details