ConnecticutWest Hartford

Saint Mary Home

2021 Albany Ave, West Hartford, CT 06117 · Capitol County · 256 certified beds · avg 199 residents/day · certified since Jan 1, 1967

Abuse citation flag (CMS)

Part of chain: TRINITY HEALTH (19 facilities, chain avg rating 3.3★)

The abuse flag means inspectors cited this facility for abuse that caused harm to a resident within the past year, or potential for harm in each of the last two years. Source: CMS.

2/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
1
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
3.89
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Feb 16, 2022 · F-0760

The facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication.

Why it matters: A serious medication error can cause real harm, hospitalization, or worse.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Mar 28, 2022 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (26)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Mar 3, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care. · from a complaint
Feb 4, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint
Nov 19, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · from a complaint
Nov 12, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not educate residents and staff about COVID-19 vaccination, offer the vaccine to those eligible after that education, or properly document everyone's vaccination status.
Nov 12, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not give residents the required written notice of their rights, the facility's rules, the services offered, and what those services cost.
Nov 12, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not protect residents from being involuntarily separated — kept apart from other residents, kept out of their own room, or confined to their room. Isolating a resident this way is a form of mistreatment.
Nov 12, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Nov 12, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures for offering residents flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
Nov 12, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
Nov 12, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
Sep 10, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint
Sep 10, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Aug 8, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · from a complaint
Jun 11, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · from a complaint
Jan 26, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · from a complaint
Feb 16, 2022▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication.
Feb 16, 2022E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs.
Feb 16, 2022E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide residents with enough to drink, or with drinks matching their needs and preferences, to keep them properly hydrated.
Feb 16, 2022E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Feb 16, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from misuse of their belongings or money — this is called misappropriation, and it includes theft or improper use of a resident's property or funds.
Feb 16, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards.
Feb 16, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have a working call system — the button or cord residents use to summon help — in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
Jul 25, 2019D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Jul 25, 2019D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist.
Jul 25, 2019D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Jul 25, 2019D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (7 → 7).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
201940D
202271G ▲
2024120F
202510D
202620D

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityConnecticut avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.893.803.95top 35% in Connecticut; top 44% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.720.700.69top 32% in Connecticut; top 35% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.583.433.50top 31% in Connecticut; top 38% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.420.460.48top 44% in Connecticut; top 44% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)23.837.445.8top 11% in Connecticut; top 6% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)30.038.642.9top 33% in Connecticut; top 29% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.80, RN 0.70, weekend 3.51. Staffing rating: 4/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5

Who owns this facility

Non profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Mercy Community Health INC.Organization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%01/01/1997
Trinity Continuing Care ServicesOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest100%07/01/2016
Bowens, MarcusIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE03/01/2022
Demaida, RachaelIndividualW-2 Managing EmployeeNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2022
Hamilton-Crawford, JaniceIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2022
Hamilton-Crawford, JaniceIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE06/05/2022
Johnson, PatrickIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE12/31/2011
Kane, AnnIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2022
Latovick, PamelaIndividualW-2 Managing EmployeeNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2016
Latovick, PamelaIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2016
McKeon, PatriciaIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2022
Murphy, PeterIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE05/31/2013
Raman, ShyamalaIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2022
Singh, GagandeepIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2022
Walker, MarkIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE05/31/2011

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Chelsea Place Care Center LLC1.6 miHartford, CT★☆☆☆☆1/5abuse
West Hartford Health & Rehabilitation Center1.6 miWest Hartford, CT★★★★★4/5
Hebrew Center for Health and Rehabilitation1.8 miWest Hartford, CT★★★☆☆2/5abuse
Parkville Care Center2.2 miHartford, CT★★★☆☆3/5
Bloomfield Center for Nursing & Rehabilitation2.6 miBloomfield, CT★★☆☆☆2/5abuse
Touchpoints at Bloomfield2.8 miBloomfield, CT★★★★☆3/5
Trinity Hill Care Center2.9 miHartford, CT★★☆☆☆2/5abuse
Seabury3.4 miBloomfield, CT★★★★★4/5
Caleb Hitchcock Health Center3.5 miBloomfield, CT★★☆☆☆1/5abuse
Avery Nursing Home/Noble Building3.8 miHartford, CT★☆☆☆☆1/5
Autumn Lake Healthcare at West Hartford4.0 miWest Hartford, CT★★★☆☆2/5
Riverside Health & Rehabilitation Center4.3 miEast Hartford, CT★★☆☆☆2/5abuse

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in West Hartford →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 075085.