New YorkWaterloo

Seneca Nursing & Rehabilitation Center, LLC

200 Douglas Drive, Waterloo, NY 13165 · Seneca County · 120 certified beds · avg 67 residents/day · certified since Oct 8, 1973

Part of chain: HURLBUT CARE (13 facilities, chain avg rating 3.8★)

4/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
3.41
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (15)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Jun 27, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · from a complaint
Jun 27, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
Jun 27, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs.
Jun 27, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Jun 27, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Jun 27, 2025B · Minimal risk, repeatedThe facility did not give residents proper notice about what Medicare or Medicaid covers, or about charges the resident might owe for services that aren't covered.
Jun 28, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
Jun 28, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide activities that meet residents' needs and interests. Nursing homes must offer meaningful activity programs, not just leave residents idle.
Jun 28, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Sep 10, 2021E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft. These written safeguards are the foundation of resident protection.
Sep 10, 2021E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Sep 10, 2021E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems.
Sep 10, 2021E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits.
Sep 10, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation.
Sep 10, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (3 → 6).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202160E
202330D
202560E

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityNew York avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.413.583.95bottom 49% in New York; bottom 32% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.450.680.69bottom 25% in New York; bottom 30% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing2.673.133.50bottom 28% in New York; bottom 15% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.190.480.48bottom 12% in New York; bottom 11% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)47.740.345.8bottom 31% in New York; bottom 43% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)62.539.842.9bottom 10% in New York; bottom 19% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.37, RN 0.45, weekend 2.64. Staffing rating: 2/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 3/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Limited Liability company

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Curletta, MarkIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE07/16/2021
Curletta, MarkIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE07/16/2021
Curletta, MarkIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/16/2021
Hurlbut Health Consulting, LLCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/13/2025
Hurlbut Health Consulting, LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/13/2025
The Bonadio GroupOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/1978

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Finger Lakes Health7.3 miGeneva, NY★★☆☆☆2/5
The Commons on St Anthony, a S N F & Short T R C13.5 miAuburn, NY★★★☆☆2/5
Auburn Rehabilitation & Nursing Center13.6 miAuburn, NY★★☆☆☆2/5
Wayne County Nursing Home14.3 miLyons, NY★☆☆☆☆1/5
Finger Lakes Center for Living14.5 miAuburn, NY★☆☆☆☆1/5abuse
Clifton Springs Hospital and Clinic Extended Care15.2 miClifton Springs, NY★★★★☆4/5
Newark Manor Nursing Home INC16.7 miNewark, NY★★★★☆4/5
Wayne Health Care17.1 miNewark, NY★★★★☆3/5
Ontario Center for Rehabilitation and Healthcare18.6 miCanandaigua, NY★☆☆☆☆1/5abuse
Soldiers and Sailors Memorial Hospital Extended Ca19.5 miPenn Yan, NY★☆☆☆☆1/5
Penn Yan Manor Nursing Home INC19.6 miPenn Yan, NY★★★★★5/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Waterloo →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 335400.