OhioAlliance

Altercare of Alliance Ctr for Rehab & NC INC

11750 Klinger Avenue NE, Alliance, OH 44601 · Stark County · 96 certified beds · avg 68 residents/day · certified since Nov 28, 1978

Part of chain: ALTERCARE (22 facilities, chain avg rating 3.3★)

3/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
2.82
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (26)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Apr 3, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not properly notify residents about the balance of money it holds for them, or failed to return those funds when a resident was discharged, evicted, or died.
Apr 3, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away.
Apr 3, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Apr 3, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist.
Jul 22, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint
Jul 22, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · from a complaint
Mar 14, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not electronically submit complete and accurate staffing information to the government, based on payroll and other verifiable records. · from a complaint
Oct 27, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · from a complaint
Oct 27, 2022F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Oct 27, 2022F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility's menus did not meet residents' nutritional needs, or were not prepared in advance, followed as written, kept up to date, or reviewed by a dietician.
Oct 27, 2022E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have enough nursing staff each day to meet every resident's needs, or did not have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift. Adequate staffing is one of the strongest predictors of good care.
Oct 27, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away.
Oct 27, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not give residents (and their representatives and the ombudsman, a state advocate for residents) proper advance notice before a transfer or discharge, including information about their right to appeal.
Oct 27, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not give the resident or their representative written notice of how long it would hold the resident's bed during a hospital stay or approved leave.
Oct 27, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not fully assess residents on time — a complete assessment of health, abilities, and needs is required when a resident is first admitted and at least once every 12 months after that.
Oct 27, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline.
Oct 27, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections.
Oct 27, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not safely and appropriately administer IV fluids (fluids given through a vein) for residents who needed them.
Oct 27, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe, appropriate care for residents who need dialysis — the treatment that filters the blood when kidneys fail.
Oct 27, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide timely, quality laboratory tests to meet residents' needs.
Oct 27, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide or arrange dental services for its residents. Nursing homes are responsible for making sure residents can get dental care.
Oct 27, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards.
Oct 27, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have a working program to monitor how antibiotics are used. Tracking antibiotic use helps make sure these drugs are given only when needed and remain effective.
Oct 24, 2019E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
Oct 24, 2019D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Oct 24, 2019D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (15 → 4).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
201930E
2022150F
202310E
202430F
202540D

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityOhio avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)2.823.453.95bottom 13% in Ohio; bottom 9% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.420.600.69bottom 24% in Ohio; bottom 26% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing2.443.073.50bottom 9% in Ohio; bottom 8% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.320.420.48bottom 35% in Ohio; bottom 36% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)55.448.745.8bottom 30% in Ohio; bottom 24% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)50.043.942.9bottom 43% in Ohio; bottom 39% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.85, RN 0.58, weekend 3.33. Staffing rating: 1/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Gerald F Schroer Dynasty Tr Ua 12312009 Fbo Andrew M SchroerOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest12/15/2015
Gerald F Schroer Dynasty Tr Ua 12312009 Fbo Gerald F Schroer JrOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest12/15/2015
Gerald F Schroer Dynasty Tr Ua 12312009 Fbo Matthew SchroerOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest12/15/2015
Gerald F Schroer Dynasty Tr Ua 12312009 Margaret S GoodmanOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest12/15/2015
Susanne Schroer Dynasty Trust U/AOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest12/15/2009
The Schroer Group, INC.Organization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest10/01/2001
TSG Nursing Centers, INCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%12/13/2002
Altercare of Ohio, INCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2001
Film, GeorgeIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2018
Goodman, JohnIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2003
Johnson, KathyIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2010
Mock, DouglasIndividualW-2 Managing EmployeeNOT APPLICABLE09/20/2021
Mock, DouglasIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE09/20/2021
Mock, DouglasIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE09/20/2021
Nutter, OrianIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2020

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Roselawn Gardens Nursing & Rehabilitation0.2 miAlliance, OH★★★★★4/5
McCrea Manor NSNG and Rehab Ctr LLC1.9 miAlliance, OH★★☆☆☆3/5
Canterbury Villa of Alliance2.9 miAlliance, OH★★☆☆☆2/5
Bel Air Care Center2.9 miAlliance, OH★★★★☆4/5
Green Meadows Skilled Nursing and Rehab5.7 miLouisville, OH★★☆☆☆1/5
Crandall Nursing Home5.9 miSebring, OH★★★★☆4/5
Louisville Gardens Care Center7.7 miLouisville, OH★★☆☆☆1/5
Altercare of Louisville Ctr for Rehab & Nsg Care8.2 miLouisville, OH★★★☆☆3/5
Auburn Skilled Nursing and Rehab9.6 miSalem, OH★★★★☆3/5
Saint Joseph Care Center10.2 miLouisville, OH★★☆☆☆2/5
Altercare of Hartville Ctr for11.8 miHartville, OH★★★★★4/5
Windsor Medical Center INC14.0 miNorth Canton, OH★★★★☆4/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Alliance →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 365402.