Robinson Rehab and Nursing
600 East Robinwood Drive, Robinson, IL 62454 · Crawford County · 67 certified beds · avg 63 residents/day · certified since Jul 1, 1993
Part of chain: STERN CONSULTANTS (22 facilities, chain avg rating 2.5★)
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.
Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)
▲ Actual harm, one-off · Sep 15, 2025 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.
Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.
Corrected: Sep 8, 2025 (Past Non-Compliance)
▲ Actual harm, one-off · Sep 3, 2025 · F-0550 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
Why it matters: Being treated without dignity harms a resident's self-worth, mental health, and overall quality of life.
Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.
Corrected: Sep 4, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
▲ Actual harm, one-off · Mar 27, 2024 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.
Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.
Corrected: Apr 5, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
All citations in the current public record (22)
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 17, 2026 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint |
| Jun 17, 2026 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint |
| Jun 17, 2026 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · from a complaint |
| Nov 21, 2025 | F · Potential for harm, facility-wide | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. |
| Nov 21, 2025 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. |
| Sep 15, 2025 | ▲ G · Actual harm, one-off | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint |
| Sep 3, 2025 | ▲ G · Actual harm, one-off | The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · from a complaint |
| Sep 3, 2025 | F · Potential for harm, facility-wide | The facility did not have enough nursing staff each day to meet every resident's needs, or did not have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift. Adequate staffing is one of the strongest predictors of good care. · from a complaint |
| Jul 2, 2025 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · from a complaint |
| Aug 16, 2024 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not update each resident's care assessment at least once every 3 months. These regular check-ins keep the resident's care plan matched to their current condition. |
| Aug 16, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not fully assess residents on time — a complete assessment of health, abilities, and needs is required when a resident is first admitted and at least once every 12 months after that. |
| Aug 16, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not make sure special medical diets — like low-sodium or diabetic diets — were properly ordered by the resident's doctor or managed by a qualified dietitian as state law allows. |
| Aug 16, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide special eating equipment and utensils — like adaptive cups or easy-grip silverware — for residents who need them, along with appropriate help at meals. |
| Aug 16, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. |
| Mar 27, 2024 | ▲ G · Actual harm, one-off | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint |
| Oct 20, 2023 | F · Potential for harm, facility-wide | The facility did not have a working call system — the button or cord residents use to summon help — in each resident's bathroom and bathing area. |
| Oct 20, 2023 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. |
| Oct 20, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups. |
| Oct 20, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. |
| Oct 20, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not keep residents' medications free from unnecessary drugs. Residents should only take medicines they truly need, at the right dose, for a clear reason. |
| Oct 20, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication. |
| Oct 20, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (5 → 2).
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 7 | 0 | F |
| 2024 | 6 | 1 | G ▲ |
| 2025 | 6 | 2 | G ▲ |
| 2026 | 3 | 0 | D |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
1 fine totaling $14,015.
| Date | Type | Amount / length |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 3, 2025 | Fine | $14,015 |
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
| Measure | This facility | Illinois avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.08 | 2.99 | 3.95 | top 29% in Illinois; bottom 16% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.68 | 0.63 | 0.69 | top 29% in Illinois; top 39% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 2.64 | 2.67 | 3.50 | top 35% in Illinois; bottom 14% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.55 | 0.56 | 0.48 | top 39% in Illinois; top 28% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 47.6 | 44.5 | 45.8 | bottom 40% in Illinois; bottom 43% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 56.3 | 41.8 | 42.9 | bottom 26% in Illinois; bottom 26% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.51, RN 0.77, weekend 3.01. Staffing rating: 2/5.
Self-reported quality measures
Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.
Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 3/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5
Who owns this facility
For profit - Partnership
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| E Newhouse Family Trust | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/01/2022 |
| Erblich, Avraham | Individual | Direct Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/01/2022 |
| Etn Family Holdings LLC | Organization | Direct Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/01/2022 |
| Friedman, Benjamin | Individual | Direct Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/01/2022 |
| Millman, Chaim | Individual | Direct Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/01/2022 |
| Newhouse, Eric | Individual | Direct Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/01/2022 |
| Sheps, Boruch | Individual | Direct Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/01/2022 |
| Stern, Bezalel | Individual | Direct Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/01/2022 |
| T Newhouse Family Trust | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/01/2022 |
| E Newhouse Family Trust | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/01/2022 |
| Erblich, Avraham | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/01/2025 |
| Erblich, Avraham | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/01/2022 |
| Erblich, Avraham | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/01/2025 |
| Etn Family Holdings LLC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/01/2022 |
| Etn Family Holdings LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/01/2022 |
| Friedman, Benjamin | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/01/2022 |
| Friedman, Benjamin | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/01/2022 |
| Friedman, Benjamin | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/01/2022 |
| Mathew, Stanley | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/01/2025 |
| Mathew, Stanley | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/01/2025 |
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
- "Can you give me examples of how your staff protect residents' dignity in everyday care, like bathing and dressing?"
- "Tell me about this abuse or neglect citation — what happened, and what specific changes did you make afterward?"
- "When abuse or theft is suspected, who do you notify, how fast, and how do you inform the family?"
- "If someone reports suspected abuse or neglect here, what happens in the first 24 hours?"
- "What did your most recent kitchen inspection find, and can I see how food is stored and prepared?"
- "Who leads your infection prevention program, and how do you make sure staff follow practices like hand hygiene every day?"
- "What is your nurse and aide staffing ratio on each shift, including nights and weekends?"
- "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
- "Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"
Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Haven of Ridgeview | 9.3 mi | Oblong, IL | ★☆☆☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Waters of Sullivan Nursing Facility, the | 18.0 mi | Sullivan, IN | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Oak Village | 18.4 mi | Oaktown, IN | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Envive of Sullivan | 18.7 mi | Sullivan, IN | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 145760.