IllinoisSpringfield

Springfield Suites Rehab and Nursing

3089 Old Jacksonville Road, Springfield, IL 62704 · Sangamon County · 75 certified beds · avg 69 residents/day · certified since May 17, 2013

Part of chain: STERN CONSULTANTS (22 facilities, chain avg rating 2.5★)

3/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
3
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
3.70
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Mar 25, 2025 · F-0697 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it.

Why it matters: Untreated pain causes needless suffering and can lead to depression, poor sleep, and declining health.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Mar 30, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Nov 25, 2024 · F-0550

The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.

Why it matters: Being treated without dignity harms a resident's self-worth, mental health, and overall quality of life.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Dec 3, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Nov 25, 2024 · F-0697

The facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it.

Why it matters: Untreated pain causes needless suffering and can lead to depression, poor sleep, and declining health.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Nov 26, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (28)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Dec 3, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Dec 3, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Dec 3, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility used feeding tubes without a valid medical reason or the resident's agreement, or did not provide proper care to residents who have feeding tubes.
Nov 19, 2025F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature. · from a complaint
Mar 25, 2025▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it. · from a complaint
Dec 6, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Nov 25, 2024▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
Nov 25, 2024▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it.
Nov 25, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not post its nurse staffing information every day. Nursing homes must publicly display how many nurses and aides are on duty each day.
Nov 25, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Nov 25, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Nov 25, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not run an ongoing quality assurance committee that reviews care problems and creates plans to fix them.
Nov 25, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Nov 25, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not designate a qualified infection preventionist — a trained person responsible for running the infection prevention and control program.
Nov 25, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections.
Nov 25, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Nov 25, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Nov 25, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility used feeding tubes without a valid medical reason or the resident's agreement, or did not provide proper care to residents who have feeding tubes.
Nov 25, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Nov 25, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits.
Nov 25, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have a working program to monitor how antibiotics are used. Tracking antibiotic use helps make sure these drugs are given only when needed and remain effective.
Nov 25, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures for offering residents flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
Dec 14, 2023F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Dec 14, 2023F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Dec 14, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Dec 14, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections.
Dec 14, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Oct 25, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not properly prepare residents for a safe transfer or discharge. Before a resident leaves, the facility must get them ready and make sure the move is safe and orderly. · from a complaint

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (16 → 3).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202360F
2024172G ▲
202551G ▲

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

0 fines totaling $0, plus 1 Medicare payment denial period.

DateTypeAmount / length
Nov 25, 2024Payment Denial1 days from Dec 18, 2024

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityIllinois avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.702.993.95top 20% in Illinois; bottom 47% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.560.630.69top 42% in Illinois; bottom 46% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.012.673.50top 24% in Illinois; bottom 31% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.560.560.48top 36% in Illinois; top 27% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)57.144.545.8bottom 19% in Illinois; bottom 21% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)42.941.842.9bottom 47% in Illinois; bottom 49% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.94, RN 0.74, weekend 4.02. Staffing rating: 2/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Limited Liability company

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Com Family TrustOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest12%12/01/2024
Etn Family Holdings LLCOrganizationDirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2024
Millman, ChaimIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2024
Newhouse, EricIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2024
Stern, BezalelIndividualDirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2024
The Estate of Peter SchorrOrganizationDirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2024
Com Family TrustOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2024
Cook, WindyIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2024
E Newhouse Family TrustOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2024
Erblich, AvrahamIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2024
Erblich, AvrahamIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2024
Etn Family Holdings LLCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2024
Etn Family Holdings LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2024
Friedman, BenjaminIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2024
Friedman, BenjaminIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2024
Friedman, BenjaminIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2024
Millman, ChaimIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2024
Millman, ChaimIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2024
Millman, ChaimIndividualTrustee of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2024
Millman, ChaimIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2024

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Arc at Sangamon Valley1.0 miSpringfield, IL★☆☆☆☆1/5
Concordia Village Care Center1.4 miSpringfield, IL★★★★★4/5
Regency Care1.6 miSpringfield, IL★☆☆☆☆2/5
Arcadia Care on the Hill3.1 miSpringfield, IL★☆☆☆☆1/5
Avenues at Springfield4.5 miSpringfield, IL★★☆☆☆3/5
Villa Health Care East9.6 miSherman, IL★☆☆☆☆2/5
Arcadia Care Auburn13.3 miAuburn, IL★☆☆☆☆3/5
Sunny Acres Nursing Home15.2 miPetersburg, IL★☆☆☆☆1/5abuse

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Springfield →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 146160.