Rhode IslandCoventry

Riverview Healthcare Community

546 Main Street, Coventry, RI 02816 · Kent County · 190 certified beds · avg 181 residents/day · certified since Mar 7, 1986

Part of chain: MARQUIS HEALTH SERVICES (87 facilities, chain avg rating 3.0★)

2/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
3
Serious findings on record
$80,101
Fines, last 3 years
2.94
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 2/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Jun 17, 2026 · F-0760 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication.

Why it matters: A serious medication error can cause real harm, hospitalization, or worse.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

Corrected: Jun 17, 2026 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Nov 28, 2025 · F-0628 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not provide required paperwork or notices about a resident's needs, their right to appeal a transfer or discharge, or the facility's bed-hold policy (how long a bed is saved during a hospital stay).

Why it matters: Without these notices, a family may not know they can appeal a discharge or that a bed can be held.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

Corrected: Dec 10, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, repeated · May 8, 2024 · F-0760 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication.

Why it matters: A serious medication error can cause real harm, hospitalization, or worse.

Severity (K): A life-threatening or extremely dangerous situation affected several residents. Among the most serious findings an inspection can produce.

Corrected: May 8, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (30)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Jun 17, 2026▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-offThe facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication. · from a complaint
Apr 2, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow.
Apr 2, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration.
Apr 2, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Apr 2, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication.
Apr 2, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Apr 2, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Dec 5, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have enough nursing staff each day to meet every resident's needs, or did not have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift. Adequate staffing is one of the strongest predictors of good care. · from a complaint
Nov 28, 2025▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-offThe facility did not provide required paperwork or notices about a resident's needs, their right to appeal a transfer or discharge, or the facility's bed-hold policy (how long a bed is saved during a hospital stay). · from a complaint
Nov 28, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint
Nov 28, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away. · from a complaint
Nov 28, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make sure its nurses and nurse aides had the skills and training needed to properly care for every resident. · from a complaint
Jan 28, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Jan 3, 2025F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Jan 3, 2025F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not have a working call system — the button or cord residents use to summon help — in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
Jan 3, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow.
Jan 3, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Jan 3, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
May 8, 2024▲ K · Immediate jeopardy, repeatedThe facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication. · from a complaint
May 8, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · from a complaint
May 8, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · from a complaint
May 8, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · from a complaint
Apr 15, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · from a complaint
Jan 25, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.
Jan 25, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections.
Jan 25, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Jan 25, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not create and follow a basic care plan covering a new resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of admission. The first days are when a new resident is most vulnerable.
Jan 25, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it.
Jan 25, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication.
Jan 25, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (5 → 6).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
2024121K ▲
2025111J ▲
202671J ▲

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

3 fines totaling $80,101.

DateTypeAmount / length
Jun 17, 2026Fine$16,355
Nov 28, 2025Fine$15,129
Apr 15, 2024Fine$48,617

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityRhode Island avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)2.943.883.95bottom 4% in Rhode Island; bottom 12% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.410.800.69bottom 7% in Rhode Island; bottom 23% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing2.753.483.50bottom 12% in Rhode Island; bottom 18% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.340.550.48bottom 17% in Rhode Island; bottom 40% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)40.140.645.8bottom 48% in Rhode Island; top 37% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)35.737.942.9bottom 48% in Rhode Island; top 39% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.57, RN 0.49, weekend 3.33. Staffing rating: 2/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Limited Liability company

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Skilled Venture LLCOrganizationDirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2022
Benitez, JoseIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2022
Benitez, JoseIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2022
Cibc Bank USAOrganization5% or Greater Security InterestNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2022
Cohen, DavidIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE03/03/2025
Cohen, DavidIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/03/2025
Marquis Limited LLCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2022
Marquis Limited LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/12/2025
NFR 2020 Irrv TrOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2022
Posen, MindeeIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2022
Posen, MindeeIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2022
Reliant Pro Rehab LLCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2022
Reliant Pro Rehab LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/12/2025
Riverview Property LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2022
Sechio, GretchenIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2022
Sechio, GretchenIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2022
Sechio, GretchenIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2022
Sechio, GretchenIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2022
SK Nexgen TrOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2022
Uak 2020 Irrv TrOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2022

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
West View Nursing Home, INC2.7 miWest Warwick, RI★☆☆☆☆1/5
Kent Regency Center3.6 miWarwick, RI★★★★☆4/5
Greenwood Operations DBA Greenwood Center4.1 miWarwick, RI★☆☆☆☆1/5
Sunny View Nursing Home4.2 miWarwick, RI★★☆☆☆2/5
Coventry Operations Ri LLC DBA Respiratory and Reh4.7 miCoventry, RI—/5abuseSFF
Cedar Crest Nursing Centre INC4.8 miCranston, RI★★★★★4/5
Brentwood Health Center5.5 miWarwick, RI★★☆☆☆2/5
Morgan Health Center6.2 miJohnston, RI★★★☆☆2/5
Briarcliffe Manor6.2 miJohnston, RI★★★★★5/5
Saint Elizabeth Home East Greenwich7.0 miEast Greenwich, RI★★★☆☆2/5abuse

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Coventry →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 415082.