TexasWaxahachie

Pleasant Manor Healthcare and Rehabilitation

3650 S. Interstate 35 E, Waxahachie, TX 75165 · Ellis County · 132 certified beds · avg 86 residents/day · certified since Oct 25, 2001

Part of chain: THE ENSIGN GROUP (342 facilities, chain avg rating 3.2★)

2/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
2
Serious findings on record
$29,011
Fines, last 3 years
3.36
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Feb 14, 2024 · F-0600 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.

Why it matters: Abuse and neglect cause direct physical and emotional harm and are among the most serious failures a nursing home can have.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

Corrected: Mar 4, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Feb 14, 2024 · F-0697 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it.

Why it matters: Untreated pain causes needless suffering and can lead to depression, poor sleep, and declining health.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

Corrected: Mar 4, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (29)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Apr 10, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility's menus did not meet residents' nutritional needs, or were not prepared in advance, followed as written, kept up to date, or reviewed by a dietician. · from a complaint
Apr 10, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint
Mar 5, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Mar 5, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist.
Mar 5, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility has more than 120 beds but did not hire a qualified full-time social worker as required.
Mar 5, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups.
Mar 5, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away.
Mar 5, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs.
Mar 5, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility gave residents unnecessary mind-altering (psychotropic) medications, or used drugs in a way that restrained residents by dulling their ability to think, move, or function.
Mar 5, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Mar 5, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
Mar 5, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Mar 5, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep all essential equipment working safely — things like heating and cooling systems, kitchen equipment, and medical devices.
Jan 10, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Jan 10, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Jan 10, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
Jan 10, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not coordinate resident assessments with the state's pre-admission screening program for mental illness and intellectual disabilities, or failed to refer residents for the special services they need.
Jan 10, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Jan 10, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Jan 10, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents' medications free from unnecessary drugs. Residents should only take medicines they truly need, at the right dose, for a clear reason.
Jan 10, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Feb 14, 2024▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
Feb 14, 2024▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it. · from a complaint
Feb 14, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · from a complaint
Nov 15, 2023F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Nov 15, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away. · from a complaint
Nov 15, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not coordinate resident assessments with the state's pre-admission screening program for mental illness and intellectual disabilities, or failed to refer residents for the special services they need. · from a complaint
Nov 15, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint
Nov 15, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (8 → 11).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202350F
202432J ▲
202580E
2026130E

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

2 fines totaling $29,011.

DateTypeAmount / length
Mar 5, 2026Fine$14,015
Feb 14, 2024Fine$14,996

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityTexas avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.363.463.95top 46% in Texas; bottom 29% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.420.440.69top 43% in Texas; bottom 25% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing2.923.043.50top 49% in Texas; bottom 27% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.260.340.48bottom 41% in Texas; bottom 24% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)57.755.345.8bottom 37% in Texas; bottom 20% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)62.554.642.9bottom 38% in Texas; bottom 19% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.31, RN 0.41, weekend 2.88. Staffing rating: 2/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Limited Liability company

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Eastland Memorial Hospital DistrictOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%12/01/2019
Burnam, SoonIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2019
Ensign Services INCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE08/19/2019
Hardrick, ChasidyIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2019
Hardrick, ChasidyIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2019
Hardrick, ChasidyIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2019
Keetch, ChadIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE03/01/2011
Laheji, JunaidIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2025
Laheji, JunaidIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2025
Laheji, JunaidIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2019
Percheron Healthcare, INC.OrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2019
Percheron Healthcare, INC.OrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE08/14/2025
Spring Trail Health Holdings LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2019
Standard Bearer Healthcare Op, LPOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2019
Taylor, StephenIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2025
The Ensign Group INCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2019

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Focused Care of Waxahachie3.3 miWaxahachie, TX★☆☆☆☆2/5abuse
Legend Oaks Healthcare and Rehabilitation - Waxaha5.8 miWaxahachie, TX★☆☆☆☆2/5
Midtowne Meadows Health & Rehab11.6 miMidlothian, TX★★★★☆5/5
Midlothian Healthcare Center11.6 miMidlothian, TX★★★☆☆3/5
Renaissance Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center11.9 miItaly, TX★★★★★5/5
Legend Oaks Healthcare and Rehabilitation - Ennis12.8 miEnnis, TX★★★★★5/5
Red Oak Health and Rehabilitation Center12.9 miRed Oak, TX★★★☆☆4/5
Ennis Care Center13.3 miEnnis, TX★☆☆☆☆2/5
Bluebonnet Rehab at Ennis14.3 miEnnis, TX★★★★☆4/5
Park Village Healthcare and Rehabilitation15.6 miDesoto, TX★★☆☆☆1/5abuse
Methodist Transitional Care Center-Desoto LLC17.1 miDesoto, TX★★★☆☆2/5
Cedar Hill Healthcare Center17.2 miCedar Hill, TX★★☆☆☆3/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Waxahachie →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 675889.