8324 Cameron Rd, Austin, TX 78754 (opens Google Maps) · Travis County · (737) 241-0800· 119 certified beds · avg 113 residents/day · certified since Nov 20, 2018 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: THE ENSIGN GROUP (342 facilities, chain avg rating 3.2★)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
▲ Immediate jeopardy, isolated · Jun 14, 2024 · F-0919
The facility did not have a working call system — the button or cord residents use to summon help — in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
Why it matters: A resident who falls or needs help in a bathroom without a working call button may be stranded and unable to summon aid.
Severity (J): Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety was cited. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Jun 15, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
Showing the latest 3 of 16 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not allow a resident's chosen representative — often a family member or someone with power of attorney — to exercise the resident's rights on their behalf. When a resident can't speak for themselves, their representative steps into that role. · from a complaint F-0551
The facility did not make sure a transfer or discharge met the resident's needs and preferences, or did not properly prepare the resident to leave safely. · from a complaint F-0627
The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. F-0755
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| May 12, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not allow a resident's chosen representative — often a family member or someone with power of attorney — to exercise the resident's rights on their behalf. When a resident can't speak for themselves, their representative steps into that role. · from a complaint · F-0551 |
| May 12, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not make sure a transfer or discharge met the resident's needs and preferences, or did not properly prepare the resident to leave safely. · from a complaint · F-0627 |
| Jul 24, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · F-0755 |
| Jun 16, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not coordinate resident assessments with the state's pre-admission screening program for mental illness and intellectual disabilities, or failed to refer residents for the special services they need. · from a complaint · F-0644 |
| Jun 24, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not let a resident return after a hospital stay or approved leave that lasted longer than the facility's bed-hold policy allowed. Residents generally have the right to come back to the next available bed. · from a complaint · F-0626 |
| Jun 14, 2024 | ▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, isolated | The facility did not have a working call system — the button or cord residents use to summon help — in each resident's bathroom and bathing area. · F-0919 |
| Jun 14, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · F-0695 |
| Jun 14, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Jun 14, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care. · F-0578 |
| Jun 14, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not fully assess residents on time — a complete assessment of health, abilities, and needs is required when a resident is first admitted and at least once every 12 months after that. · F-0636 |
| Jun 14, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not properly complete the required screening (called PASARR) that identifies whether a person entering a nursing home has a mental illness or intellectual disability and needs specialized services. · F-0645 |
| Jun 14, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · F-0677 |
| May 11, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| May 11, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · F-0584 |
| May 11, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide food that accounts for each resident's allergies, intolerances, and personal preferences, or did not offer appealing alternatives. · F-0806 |
| May 11, 2023 | C · Potential for minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not make its inspection results easy for residents to see, or made it hard for residents to contact advocacy agencies like the ombudsman. · F-0577 |
Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (7 → 1).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 4 | 0 | E |
| 2024 | 8 | 1 | J ▲ |
| 2025 | 2 | 0 | D |
| 2026 | 2 | 0 | D |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
1 fine totaling $11,168.
Every penalty CMS publishes for this facility in the 3-year window is listed —none excluded. The count and the dollar total come from two different CMS datasets and agree for this facility. Penalties older than the window are dropped by CMS before publication, not by us.
| Date | Type | Amount / length |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 14, 2024 | Fine | $11,168 |
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Texas avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.22 | 3.46 | 3.95 | bottom 42% in Texas; bottom 23% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.45 | 0.44 | 0.69 | top 34% in Texas; bottom 30% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 2.75 | 3.04 | 3.50 | bottom 34% in Texas; bottom 18% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.25 | 0.34 | 0.48 | bottom 39% in Texas; bottom 22% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | — | 55.3 | 45.8 | — |
| RN turnover (%) | — | 54.6 | 42.9 | — |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.04, RN 0.42, weekend 2.59.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.04 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 1/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: 4/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Sedona Trace Health and Wellness Center. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guadalupe County Hospital Board | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 100% | 08/01/2021 |
| Burnam, Soon | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/01/2021 |
| Caretrust GP LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/01/2021 |
| Caretrust Reit INC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/01/2021 |
| Ctr Partnership LP | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/01/2021 |
| Ensign Services INC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/18/2021 |
| Gann, Kody | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/01/2021 |
| Hurley, Rachael | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/01/2021 |
| Hurley, Rachael | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/01/2021 |
| Hurley, Rachael | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/01/2021 |
| Keetch, Chad | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/01/2011 |
| Mustang Ridge Healthcare, INC. | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/01/2021 |
| Mustang Ridge Healthcare, INC. | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/30/2025 |
| Rathi, Anil | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/14/2024 |
| Rathi, Anil | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/14/2024 |
| Rathi, Anil | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/14/2024 |
All 16 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.
CMS lists this facility under the chain The Ensign Group — 342 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 341 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Legend Oaks Healthcare and Rehabilitation - North | 2.3 mi | Austin, TX | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
| Coral Rehabilitation and Nursing of Austin | 3.3 mi | Austin, TX | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuseSFF |
| Oakcrest Nursing and Rehabilitation Center | 3.8 mi | Austin, TX | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Heritage Park Rehabilitation and Skilled Nursing C | 4.3 mi | Austin, TX | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Gracy Woods II Living Center | 4.4 mi | Austin, TX | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Gracy Woods Nursing Center | 4.5 mi | Austin, TX | —/5 | SFF | |
| The Arbour at Westminster Manor | 4.6 mi | Austin, TX | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Avir at Park Bend | 4.9 mi | Austin, TX | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Sage Park Austin | 5.1 mi | Austin, TX | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Windsor Nursing and Rehabilitation Center of Duval | 6.5 mi | Austin, TX | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Pflugerville Nursing and Rehabilitation Center | 7.9 mi | Pflugerville, TX | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Riverside Nursing and Rehabilitation Center | 8.1 mi | Austin, TX | ★☆☆☆☆ | 2/5 | abuse |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
CMS records place this facility in Travis, TX — 28 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 676459.
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details