Richland Hills Rehabilitation and Healthcare Cente

Name: Richland Hills Rehabilitation and Healthcare Cente
Address: 3109 Kings Ct, Fort Worth, TX, 76118, US
Telephone: 8175892431

3109 Kings Ct, Fort Worth, TX 76118 · Tarrant County · 92 certified beds · avg 62 residents/day · certified since Sep 24, 1985

Part of chain: THE ENSIGN GROUP (342 facilities, chain avg rating 3.2★)

3/5

Health inspection rating (on-site)

Serious findings on record

$8,190

Fines, last 3 years

2.80

Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Nov 21, 2023 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Nov 22, 2023 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Aug 17, 2023 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Sep 8, 2023 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (36)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

Date	Severity	What the facility was cited for
May 28, 2026	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
May 7, 2026	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs.
May 7, 2026	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
May 7, 2026	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
May 7, 2026	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide routine dental care and 24-hour emergency dental care for residents.
May 7, 2026	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Dec 5, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Dec 5, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · from a complaint
Dec 5, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · from a complaint
Dec 5, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint
Feb 27, 2025	F · Potential for harm, facility-wide	The facility's menus did not meet residents' nutritional needs, or were not prepared in advance, followed as written, kept up to date, or reviewed by a dietician.
Feb 27, 2025	F · Potential for harm, facility-wide	The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Feb 27, 2025	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Feb 27, 2025	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not safely and appropriately administer IV fluids (fluids given through a vein) for residents who needed them.
Feb 27, 2025	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Feb 27, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility transferred or discharged a resident without a valid reason, or failed to provide the required documentation and information when moving a resident out. · from a complaint
Feb 27, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide activities that meet residents' needs and interests. Nursing homes must offer meaningful activity programs, not just leave residents idle.
Feb 27, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline.
Feb 27, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards.
Feb 27, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Feb 27, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not have a working call system — the button or cord residents use to summon help — in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
Jul 10, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not protect residents from being involuntarily separated — kept apart from other residents, kept out of their own room, or confined to their room. Isolating a resident this way is a form of mistreatment. · from a complaint
May 17, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · from a complaint
May 17, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not keep residents' personal and medical information private and confidential. · from a complaint
Jan 25, 2024	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not let a resident help develop and carry out their own plan of care — the written roadmap of the services and support they'll receive, built around their personal goals and preferences. · from a complaint
Jan 25, 2024	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups.
Jan 25, 2024	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time.
Jan 25, 2024	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Jan 25, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs.
Jan 25, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility used feeding tubes without a valid medical reason or the resident's agreement, or did not provide proper care to residents who have feeding tubes.
Jan 25, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Jan 25, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Jan 25, 2024	B · Minimal risk, repeated	The facility did not electronically submit complete and accurate staffing information to the government, based on payroll and other verifiable records.
Nov 21, 2023	▲ G · Actual harm, one-off	The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Aug 17, 2023	▲ G · Actual harm, one-off	The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Aug 17, 2023	F · Potential for harm, facility-wide	The facility employed staff who were not licensed, certified, or registered as required by state law. · from a complaint

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (11 → 5).

Year	Citations	Serious (G–L)	Worst severity that year
2023	3	2	G ▲
2024	12	0	E
2025	15	0	F
2026	6	0	E

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

1 fine totaling $8,190.

Date	Type	Amount / length
Nov 21, 2023	Fine	$8,190

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

Measure	This facility	Texas avg	U.S. avg	Where it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)	2.80	3.46	3.95	bottom 12% in Texas; bottom 8% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours	0.17	0.44	0.69	bottom 4% in Texas; bottom 1% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing	2.38	3.04	3.50	bottom 10% in Texas; bottom 6% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)	0.13	0.34	0.48	bottom 6% in Texas; bottom 3% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)	72.0	55.3	45.8	bottom 17% in Texas; bottom 5% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)	0.0	54.6	42.9	—

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.02, RN 0.18, weekend 2.57. Staffing rating: 1/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: —/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Corporation

Owner / manager	Type	Role	Stake	Since
Eastland Memorial Hospital District	Organization	5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest	100%	04/01/2017
Abitoye, Olutoyin	Individual	Managing Control - Governing Body	NOT APPLICABLE	04/09/2024
Abitoye, Olutoyin	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	04/09/2024
Abitoye, Olutoyin	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	04/09/2024
Burnam, Soon	Individual	Corporate Officer	NOT APPLICABLE	12/17/2012
Caretrust GP LLC	Organization	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	12/17/2012
Caretrust Reit INC	Organization	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	12/17/2012
Ctr Partnership LP	Organization	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	12/17/2012
Ensign Services INC	Organization	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	10/29/2012
Fossil Creek Healthcare, INC	Organization	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	04/01/2017
Fossil Creek Healthcare, INC	Organization	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	08/12/2025
Keetch, Chad	Individual	Corporate Officer	NOT APPLICABLE	03/01/2011
Kings Court Health Holdings LLC	Organization	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	12/17/2012
Munoz, Amy	Individual	Managing Control - Governing Body	NOT APPLICABLE	12/17/2012
Munoz, Amy	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	12/17/2012
Munoz, Amy	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	12/17/2012
Taylor, Stephen	Individual	Corporate Officer	NOT APPLICABLE	07/01/2025

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

"What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
"Can we tour the resident rooms, bathrooms, and common areas today, including areas not on the usual tour route?"
"What did your most recent kitchen inspection find, and can I see how food is stored and prepared?"
"How many aides are on each shift, and how do you make sure every resident gets timely help with bathing, dressing, and meals?"
"How do residents get routine dental care, and what happens if someone has a dental emergency at night?"
"Who leads your infection prevention program, and how do you make sure staff follow practices like hand hygiene every day?"
"Can you show me how medications are stored and secured on the units, including controlled drugs?"
"How do you keep residents' medical records accurate, complete, and secure?"
"What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
"Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

Facility	Distance	City	Overall	Inspection
Avir at Richland Hills	0.5 mi	Richland Hills, TX	★★★☆☆	3/5
Glenview Wellness & Rehabilitation	1.7 mi	North Richland Hills, TX	★☆☆☆☆	2/5
Life Care Center of Haltom	2.0 mi	Fort Worth, TX	★★★☆☆	3/5
Avir at Emerald Hills	3.1 mi	North Richland Hills, TX	★★☆☆☆	2/5
North Pointe Nursing and Rehabilitation	4.0 mi	Watauga, TX	★☆☆☆☆	1/5
Hurst Plaza Nursing and Rehab	4.3 mi	Hurst, TX	★★★★★	5/5
Green Valley Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center	4.5 mi	Fort Worth, TX	★☆☆☆☆	1/5
Park View Care Center	5.0 mi	Fort Worth, TX	★☆☆☆☆	1/5
Oakmont Guest Care Center	5.3 mi	Hurst, TX	★☆☆☆☆	1/5
Bedford Wellness & Rehabilitation	5.8 mi	Bedford, TX	★★★☆☆	3/5
Interlochen Health and Rehabilitation Center	6.3 mi	Arlington, TX	★☆☆☆☆	2/5
La Dora Nursing and Rehabilitation Center	6.3 mi	Bedford, TX	★★★★★	5/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Fort Worth →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 455576.

The Care File

Visit checklist — Richland Hills Rehabilitation and Healthcare Cente

3109 Kings Ct, Fort Worth, TX 76118 · 8175892431

Health inspection rating 3/5 · CMS overall 3/5· Fines (3y): $8,190

Most serious findings on record:

▲ Nov 21, 2023 (F-0689, Actual harm, one-off): The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
▲ Aug 17, 2023 (F-0689, Actual harm, one-off): The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Questions for the administrator:

☐ "What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
☐ "Can we tour the resident rooms, bathrooms, and common areas today, including areas not on the usual tour route?"
☐ "What did your most recent kitchen inspection find, and can I see how food is stored and prepared?"
☐ "How many aides are on each shift, and how do you make sure every resident gets timely help with bathing, dressing, and meals?"
☐ "How do residents get routine dental care, and what happens if someone has a dental emergency at night?"
☐ "Who leads your infection prevention program, and how do you make sure staff follow practices like hand hygiene every day?"
☐ "Can you show me how medications are stored and secured on the units, including controlled drugs?"
☐ "How do you keep residents' medical records accurate, complete, and secure?"
☐ "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
☐ "Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"

While you're there, notice:

☐ Smell and cleanliness in hallways, not just the lobby
☐ How staff speak to residents; call lights answered promptly
☐ Residents up, dressed, and engaged (visit mealtimes and a weekend if you can)

Data: CMS Provider Data Catalog, version 2026-08-01 · CCN 455576 · Verify at medicare.gov/care-compare · Printed from The Care File (thecarefile.com)