CaliforniaRiverside

Palm Terrace Care Center

11162 Palm Terrace Lane, Riverside, CA 92505 · Riverside County · 71 certified beds · avg 68 residents/day · certified since Apr 21, 1989

Part of chain: THE ENSIGN GROUP (342 facilities, chain avg rating 3.2★)

3/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
3.90
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (24)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Apr 8, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft. These written safeguards are the foundation of resident protection. · from a complaint
May 16, 2025F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
May 16, 2025F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not maintain an effective pest control program to prevent or deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
May 16, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups.
May 16, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have enough nursing staff each day to meet every resident's needs, or did not have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift. Adequate staffing is one of the strongest predictors of good care.
May 16, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
May 16, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
May 16, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs.
May 16, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
May 16, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not help a resident get vision and hearing services — such as eye exams, glasses, hearing tests, or hearing aids.
May 16, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide routine dental care and 24-hour emergency dental care for residents.
May 16, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide special eating equipment and utensils — like adaptive cups or easy-grip silverware — for residents who need them, along with appropriate help at meals.
May 10, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not have enough support staff to safely and effectively run its food and nutrition service.
May 10, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist.
May 10, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not prepare and serve food in a form that meets each resident's individual needs — for example, chopped, pureed, or softened food for residents with chewing or swallowing problems.
May 10, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
May 10, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care.
May 10, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide food that accounts for each resident's allergies, intolerances, and personal preferences, or did not offer appealing alternatives.
May 10, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make sure special medical diets — like low-sodium or diabetic diets — were properly ordered by the resident's doctor or managed by a qualified dietitian as state law allows.
May 10, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
May 25, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
May 25, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
May 25, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
May 25, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (8 → 11).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202340E
202480F
2025110F
202610D

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityCalifornia avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.904.313.95bottom 34% in California; top 44% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.380.610.69bottom 28% in California; bottom 19% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.303.903.50bottom 16% in California; bottom 47% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.240.510.48bottom 19% in California; bottom 20% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)43.536.745.8bottom 29% in California; top 46% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)33.338.142.9top 40% in California; top 33% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.41, RN 0.43, weekend 3.73. Staffing rating: 3/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Ayouby, QaisIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2023
Ayouby, QaisIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2023
Ayouby, QaisIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE06/29/2025
Burnam, SoonIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE11/08/2022
Ensign Services INCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE10/31/2022
Keetch, ChadIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE03/01/2011
Leet, RyanIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE02/01/2023
Leet, RyanIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE02/01/2023
Leet, RyanIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE06/29/2025
Port, BarryIndividualIndividual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE06/29/2025
Sato, AmiIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE09/09/2024
Scott, MatthewIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE02/01/2023
Willits, AdamIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE02/01/2023

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Arlington Gardens Care Center2.6 miRiverside, CA★★★☆☆2/5
Riverside Postacute Care2.7 miRiverside, CA—/5abuseSFF
Citrus Grove Post Acute2.9 miRiverside, CA★★★☆☆2/5
Riverwalk Post Acute3.0 miRiverside, CA★★★☆☆3/5
Alta Vista Healthcare & Wellness Centre3.5 miRiverside, CA★★★★☆4/5
Villa Health Care Center3.5 miRiverside, CA★★★★★4/5
Mission Care Center4.0 miRiverside, CA★★★★★5/5
Woodcrest Post Acute & Rehabilitation4.6 miRiverside, CA★★★☆☆3/5
Extended Care Hospital of Riverside4.6 miRiverside, CA★★★☆☆3/5
Corona Health Care Center5.3 miCorona, CA★★☆☆☆2/5
Valencia Gardens Health Care Center5.8 miRiverside, CA★★★★★4/5
Riverside Heights Healthcare Center, LLC5.9 miRiverside, CA★★★★★5/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Riverside →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 555365.