Oak Hill Health & Rehabilitation
7371 Cortez Oaks Blvd, Brooksville, FL 34613 · Hernando County · 109 certified beds · avg 104 residents/day · certified since May 4, 2021
Part of chain: TLC MANAGEMENT (20 facilities, chain avg rating 3.8★)
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.
All citations in the current public record (26)
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Feb 18, 2026 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint |
| Feb 18, 2026 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · from a complaint |
| Jul 2, 2025 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not properly complete the required screening (called PASARR) that identifies whether a person entering a nursing home has a mental illness or intellectual disability and needs specialized services. |
| Jul 2, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. |
| Jul 2, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. |
| Jul 2, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature. |
| Jul 2, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. |
| Jul 2, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. |
| Jul 2, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. |
| Jun 28, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · from a complaint |
| Mar 14, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. |
| Mar 14, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. |
| Mar 14, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration. · from a complaint |
| Mar 14, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. |
| Mar 14, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not keep residents' medications free from unnecessary drugs. Residents should only take medicines they truly need, at the right dose, for a clear reason. |
| Mar 14, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. |
| Mar 14, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. |
| Aug 3, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint |
| Nov 2, 2022 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility used feeding tubes without a valid medical reason or the resident's agreement, or did not provide proper care to residents who have feeding tubes. |
| Nov 2, 2022 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits. |
| Nov 2, 2022 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. |
| Nov 2, 2022 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility allowed residents to lose the ability to do daily activities — like bathing, dressing, and eating — when there was no medical reason for the decline. Good care helps residents keep the abilities they have. |
| Nov 2, 2022 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. |
| Nov 2, 2022 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. |
| Nov 2, 2022 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. |
| Nov 2, 2022 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not dispose of garbage and refuse properly. |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (7 → 7).
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 8 | 0 | E |
| 2023 | 1 | 0 | D |
| 2024 | 8 | 0 | D |
| 2025 | 7 | 0 | E |
| 2026 | 2 | 0 | D |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
| Measure | This facility | Florida avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.95 | 4.03 | 3.95 | top 43% in Florida; top 42% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.62 | 0.76 | 0.69 | bottom 43% in Florida; top 46% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 3.37 | 3.68 | 3.50 | bottom 29% in Florida; top 49% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.41 | 0.53 | 0.48 | bottom 43% in Florida; top 46% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 41.3 | 41.4 | 45.8 | top 47% in Florida; top 40% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 43.8 | 46.0 | 42.9 | top 45% in Florida; bottom 46% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.44, RN 0.69, weekend 3.78. Staffing rating: 4/5.
Self-reported quality measures
Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.
Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5
Who owns this facility
For profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ott Family Trust | Organization | Direct Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/17/2017 |
| Ott, Dwight | Individual | Direct Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/28/2017 |
| Ott, Ryan | Individual | Direct Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/28/2017 |
| Holder, Desiree | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/26/2024 |
| Holder, Desiree | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/26/2024 |
| Kolli, Anitha | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2023 |
| Kolli, Anitha | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2003 |
| Ott, Dwight | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/28/2017 |
| Ott, Gary | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/28/2017 |
| Ott, Ryan | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/28/2017 |
| Tender Loving Care Management INC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/28/2017 |
| Tender Loving Care Management INC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/07/2025 |
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "How do you make sure each resident's care follows the doctor's orders, and what changed after this citation?"
- "How do you keep residents' medical records accurate, complete, and secure?"
- "How do you screen new residents for mental health and disability-related needs, and how do you provide the specialized services they require?"
- "Can you show me how medications are stored and secured on the units, including controlled drugs?"
- "Could I join residents for a meal to see the food quality and temperature for myself?"
- "What did your most recent kitchen inspection find, and can I see how food is stored and prepared?"
- "Who leads your infection prevention program, and how do you make sure staff follow practices like hand hygiene every day?"
- "Can you tell me what this citation involved and what steps you took to bring care back up to standard?"
- "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
- "Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"
Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aviata at Spring Hill | 1.6 mi | Brooksville, FL | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Evergreen Woods | 1.8 mi | Spring Hill, FL | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Brooksville Healthcare Center | 7.1 mi | Brooksville, FL | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Northbrook Center for Rehabilitation and Healing | 7.6 mi | Brooksville, FL | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Aviata at Brooksville | 8.7 mi | Brooksville, FL | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Bayonet Point Health Center by Harborview | 16.8 mi | Hudson, FL | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Windsor Woods Rehab and Healthcare Center | 17.3 mi | Hudson, FL | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Bear Creek Nursing Center | 18.4 mi | Hudson, FL | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Solaris Healthcare Bayonet Point | 18.6 mi | Hudson, FL | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
All facilities in Brooksville →
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 106145.