MassachusettsBoston

North End Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center

70 Fulton Street, Boston, MA 02109 · Suffolk County · 100 certified beds · avg 89 residents/day · certified since Jul 1, 1990

Part of chain: MARQUIS HEALTH SERVICES (87 facilities, chain avg rating 3.0★)

2/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
2
Serious findings on record
$17,345
Fines, last 3 years
3.32
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 2/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · May 9, 2025 · F-0678

The facility did not provide basic life support, such as CPR, before emergency medical help arrived — care that's required when it matches the doctor's orders and the resident's own written wishes.

Why it matters: In a cardiac or breathing emergency, failure to start CPR promptly can be the difference between life and death.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

Corrected: May 16, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · May 9, 2025 · F-0726

The facility did not make sure its nurses and nurse aides had the skills and training needed to properly care for every resident.

Why it matters: Undertrained caregivers are more likely to miss warning signs and make care mistakes.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

Corrected: May 16, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (16)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Apr 30, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time.
Apr 30, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow.
Apr 30, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Apr 30, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections.
May 9, 2025▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-offThe facility did not provide basic life support, such as CPR, before emergency medical help arrived — care that's required when it matches the doctor's orders and the resident's own written wishes.
May 9, 2025▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-offThe facility did not make sure its nurses and nurse aides had the skills and training needed to properly care for every resident.
May 9, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility used feeding tubes without a valid medical reason or the resident's agreement, or did not provide proper care to residents who have feeding tubes.
May 9, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
May 9, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
May 9, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
May 9, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards.
May 9, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not run an ongoing quality assurance committee that reviews care problems and creates plans to fix them.
May 23, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility used physical restraints — devices that limit a resident's movement — when they weren't needed for medical treatment.
May 23, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
May 23, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow.
May 23, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (8 → 4).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202440D
202582J ▲
202640E

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

1 fine totaling $17,345.

DateTypeAmount / length
May 9, 2025Fine$17,345

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityMassachusetts avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.323.893.95bottom 20% in Massachusetts; bottom 27% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours1.070.650.69top 6% in Massachusetts; top 13% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing2.883.513.50bottom 14% in Massachusetts; bottom 25% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.920.460.48top 5% in Massachusetts; top 8% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)41.438.245.8bottom 37% in Massachusetts; top 40% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)36.042.642.9top 39% in Massachusetts; top 40% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.57, RN 1.47, weekend 3.97. Staffing rating: 3/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: 4/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Limited Liability company

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Yr 2013 Investment Tr Ua 03252013Organization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest23%10/28/2017
Buckley, StephenIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE02/26/2025
Buckley, StephenIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE02/26/2025
Buckley, StephenIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE02/26/2025
Buckley, StephenIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE02/26/2025
Cohen, DavidIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE12/18/2023
Cohen, DavidIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE12/18/2023
Kohn Fam Tr GST Exempt Uad 3-25-13OrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE12/31/2021
Likhi, RishiIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE10/27/2017
Likhi, RishiIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE10/27/2017
LTC Compliance INCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2023
M&t BankOrganization5% or Greater Security InterestNOT APPLICABLE10/28/2017
Marquis Limited LLCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2021
Marquis Limited LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/04/2025
Neb Property LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE10/28/2017
NFR 2020 Irrv TrOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE12/31/2021
Posen, MindeeIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE10/27/2017
Posen, MindeeIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE10/27/2017
Quinto Guardian LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE10/28/2017
Reliant Pro Rehab LLCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE12/13/2017

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Leonard Florence Center for Living2.0 miChelsea, MA★★★★★5/5
Highland Park Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center2.3 miChelsea, MA★☆☆☆☆1/5
Katzman Family Center for Living2.8 miChelsea, MA★★★★★5/5
The Massachusetts Veterans Home at Chelsea3.0 miChelsea, MA★★★★☆4/5
Cambridge Rehabilitation & Nursing Center3.0 miCambridge, MA★★★★☆4/5
The Center at Advocate3.1 miEast Boston, MA★☆☆☆☆1/5
Benjamin Healthcare Center3.6 miBoston, MA★☆☆☆☆1/5
Rehabilitation & Nursing Center at Everett (the)3.8 miEverett, MA★★★☆☆4/5
Sherrill House3.8 miBoston, MA★★☆☆☆2/5
Care One at Brookline3.9 miBrookline, MA★★☆☆☆2/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Boston →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 225506.