How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
Mt. Tabor Health & Rehabilitation
6040 SE Belmont Street, Portland, OR 97215 (opens Google Maps) · Multnomah County · (503) 231-7166· 120 certified beds · avg 68 residents/day · certified since Oct 1, 1978 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: HILL VALLEY HEALTHCARE (43 facilities, chain avg rating 1.8★)
2/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
inspected Jun 6, 2025
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
5.12
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)
Every record stays on this page.
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 2/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Inspection findings in the public record
Showing the latest 3 of 38 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not provide safe, appropriate care for residents who need dialysis — the treatment that filters the blood when kidneys fail. · from a complaint F-0698
The facility did not make sure its nurses and nurse aides had the skills and training needed to properly care for every resident. · from a complaint F-0726
The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint F-0684
View all 38 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Feb 24, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe, appropriate care for residents who need dialysis — the treatment that filters the blood when kidneys fail. · from a complaint · F-0698 |
| Nov 20, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not make sure its nurses and nurse aides had the skills and training needed to properly care for every resident. · from a complaint · F-0726 |
| Nov 20, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint · F-0684 |
| Nov 20, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility used feeding tubes without a valid medical reason or the resident's agreement, or did not provide proper care to residents who have feeding tubes. · from a complaint · F-0693 |
| Nov 20, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint · F-0880 |
| Jun 6, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not honor residents' right to voice complaints without discrimination or retaliation, or did not have a working complaint process that resolves issues promptly. · F-0585 |
| Jun 6, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not fully assess residents on time — a complete assessment of health, abilities, and needs is required when a resident is first admitted and at least once every 12 months after that. · F-0636 |
| Jun 6, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Jun 6, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · F-0550 |
| Jun 6, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not allow residents to take their own medications when a clinical review showed they could do so safely. Residents have this right if their care team determines it's appropriate. · F-0554 |
| Jun 6, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · F-0584 |
| Jun 6, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · F-0641 |
| Jun 6, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · from a complaint · F-0658 |
| Jun 6, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689 |
| Jun 6, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint · F-0684 |
| Apr 11, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint · F-0600 |
| Apr 11, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint · F-0609 |
| Feb 23, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · F-0584 |
| Feb 23, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have enough nursing staff each day to meet every resident's needs, or did not have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift. Adequate staffing is one of the strongest predictors of good care. · from a complaint · F-0725 |
| Feb 23, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not observe each nurse aide's job performance or provide regular training as required. · F-0730 |
| Feb 23, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · from a complaint · F-0761 |
| Feb 23, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Feb 23, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline. · F-0688 |
| Feb 23, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689 |
| Feb 23, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time. · F-0759 |
| Feb 23, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not make sure residents were fully informed about their own health, care, and treatments in a way they could understand. · from a complaint · F-0552 |
| Feb 23, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away. · from a complaint · F-0580 |
| Feb 23, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents from misuse of their belongings or money — this is called misappropriation, and it includes theft or improper use of a resident's property or funds. · from a complaint · F-0602 |
| Nov 18, 2022 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Nov 18, 2022 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Nov 18, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups. · F-0558 |
| Nov 18, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep residents' personal and medical information private and confidential. · F-0583 |
| Nov 18, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility used physical restraints — devices that limit a resident's movement — when they weren't needed for medical treatment. · F-0604 |
| Nov 18, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not fully assess residents on time — a complete assessment of health, abilities, and needs is required when a resident is first admitted and at least once every 12 months after that. · F-0636 |
| Nov 18, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · F-0677 |
| Nov 18, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · F-0686 |
| Nov 18, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide proper foot care for residents. Foot care includes routine care like nail trimming and attention to foot problems, which matter greatly for older adults. · F-0687 |
| Nov 18, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689 |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (8 → 9).
All citationsSerious citations (G–L)
2022
All citations: 10
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2024
All citations: 13
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2025
All citations: 14
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2026
All citations: 1
Serious citations (G–L): 0
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 10 | 0 | E |
| 2024 | 13 | 0 | E |
| 2025 | 14 | 0 | E |
| 2026 | 1 | 0 | D |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
What these staffing numbers mean →
This facilityOregon averageU.S. average
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)
This facility: 5.12
Oregon average: 5.42
U.S. average: 3.95
Registered Nurse hours
This facility: 0.51
Oregon average: 0.78
U.S. average: 0.69
Weekend total nurse staffing
This facility: 4.79
Oregon average: 4.85
U.S. average: 3.50
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Oregon avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 5.12 | 5.42 | 3.95 | bottom 32% in Oregon; top 11% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.51 | 0.78 | 0.69 | bottom 22% in Oregon; bottom 40% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 4.79 | 4.85 | 3.50 | bottom 49% in Oregon; top 8% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.35 | 0.48 | 0.48 | bottom 38% in Oregon; bottom 42% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 70.8 | 47.4 | 45.8 | bottom 3% in Oregon; bottom 5% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 87.5 | 51.6 | 42.9 | bottom 5% in Oregon; bottom 3% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.85, RN 0.49, weekend 4.53.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (4.85 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 3/5.
Quality measures: assessments & claims
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 3/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5
Costs & payment
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Mt. Tabor Health & Rehabilitation. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Calculate a stay from a quote you receive
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Before you compare prices
- Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
- Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
- Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
Who owns this facility
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Corporation · changed ownership in the last 12 months
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Delilah 2626 Holdings LLC | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2025 |
| JML 1836 Holdings LLC | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2025 |
| Lansilh Irrv Tr | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2025 |
| Mt Tabor SNF Operations Holdings LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 100% | 06/01/2025 |
| Delilah 2626 Holdings LLC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2025 |
| Idels, Shimon | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2025 |
| Idels, Shimon | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2025 |
| Idels, Shimon | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2025 |
| JML 1836 Holdings LLC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2025 |
| Lion 26 Holdings LLC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2025 |
| Lion 26 Holdings LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/08/2025 |
| Mt Tabor SNF Operations Holdings LLC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2025 |
| Mt Tabor SNF Operations Holdings LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/08/2025 |
| Olum, April | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2025 |
| Olum, April | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2025 |
| Sabrina 1818 Holdings LLC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2025 |
| Sabrina 1818 Holdings LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/08/2025 |
| Saessy Irrevocable Trust | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2025 |
| Slavik, Lisa | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2025 |
| Slavik, Lisa | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2025 |
Showing 20 of 21 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 1 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.
Other facilities in the same chain
CMS lists this facility under the chain Hill Valley Healthcare — 43 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
- The McKendree Post Acute & Rehabilitation — Hermitage, TN · overall 1/5abuseSFF
- Blue Ridge Therapy Connection — Stuart, VA · overall 4/5
- Brookside Rehab & Nursing Center — Warrenton, VA · overall 1/5abuse
- Carlin Springs Health & Rehabilitation — Arlington, VA · overall 1/5
- Evergreen Health and Rehabilitation Center — Winchester, VA · overall 2/5
- Fair Oaks Health & Rehabilitation — Fairfax, VA · overall 1/5
- Fairmont Crossing Health and Rehab Center — Amherst, VA · overall 2/5
- Forest Hill Health & Rehabilitation — Richmond, VA · overall 1/5
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 42 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "How do you coordinate and monitor care for residents who receive dialysis?"
- "How do you verify that your nurses and aides have the skills to care for residents with needs like my family member's?"
- "How do you make sure each resident's care follows the doctor's orders, and what changed after this citation?"
- "How do you decide when a feeding tube is truly needed, and how do staff care for residents who have one?"
- "Who leads your infection prevention program, and how do you make sure staff follow practices like hand hygiene every day?"
- "Walk me through what happens when a resident or family files a grievance — who responds and how fast?"
- "How soon after admission is a full assessment completed, and how are the findings shared with the family?"
- "What did your most recent kitchen inspection find, and can I see how food is stored and prepared?"
Also worth asking anywhere
- "Your weekend nurse staffing is reported below the Oregon midpoint — how does the weekend schedule differ from a weekday?"
- "Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
- "CMS reports 71% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
- "CMS records an ownership change here in the last 12 months — what changed for residents and staff?"
- "The ownership record on file lists 21 owning or managing parties — who makes the decisions about staffing levels?"
- "Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"
Nearby facilities (12 closest of 59 within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Belmont Care and Rehabilitation | 0.5 mi | Portland, OR | ★☆☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Providence Child Center | 1.0 mi | Portland, OR | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Laurelhurst Post Acute & Rehabilitation | 1.5 mi | Portland, OR | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Marquis Mill Park | 2.0 mi | Portland, OR | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Gateway Care and Retirement | 2.0 mi | Portland, OR | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Glisan Post Acute | 2.0 mi | Portland, OR | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Reedwood Post Acute | 2.1 mi | Portland, OR | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| The Creston Health & Rehabilitation | 2.3 mi | Portland, OR | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Holladay Park Plaza | 2.6 mi | Portland, OR | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Secora Rehabilitation of Cascadia | 2.6 mi | Portland, OR | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Evergreen Post Acute | 2.7 mi | Portland, OR | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Rose City Nursing and Rehabilitation | 2.7 mi | Portland, OR | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
Other facilities in the same county
CMS records place this facility in Multnomah, OR — 33 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
- Porthaven Post Acute — Portland, OR · overall 3/5
- Portland Health and Rehabilitation — Portland, OR · overall 1/5
- Regency Gresham Nursing & Rehabilitation Center — Gresham, OR · overall 5/5
- Robison Jewish Health Center — Portland, OR · overall 2/5
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 385141.
This page is the printable visit checklist. If your browser did not open the print dialog automatically, use File → Print (Ctrl/⌘-P).