Mountain View Rehabilitation and Care Center
5925 47th Avenue NE, Marysville, WA 98270 · Snohomish County · 82 certified beds · avg 84 residents/day · certified since Jan 1, 1992
Part of chain: THE ENSIGN GROUP (342 facilities, chain avg rating 3.2★)
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.
All citations in the current public record (36)
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 12, 2026 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · from a complaint |
| Jan 12, 2026 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. |
| Jan 12, 2026 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. |
| Jan 12, 2026 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. |
| Jan 12, 2026 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not conduct and document a facility-wide assessment of what staff, supplies, and resources it needs to care for its residents properly — during everyday operations, nights, weekends, and emergencies. · from a complaint |
| Jan 12, 2026 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. |
| May 30, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away. · from a complaint |
| Jan 9, 2025 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · from a complaint |
| Jan 9, 2025 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not fully assess residents on time — a complete assessment of health, abilities, and needs is required when a resident is first admitted and at least once every 12 months after that. |
| Jan 9, 2025 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not properly complete the required screening (called PASARR) that identifies whether a person entering a nursing home has a mental illness or intellectual disability and needs specialized services. |
| Jan 9, 2025 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. |
| Jan 9, 2025 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits. |
| Jan 9, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not reassess a resident after a significant change in their condition, such as a sudden decline in health. A full new assessment is required when a resident's condition changes in a major way. |
| Jan 9, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not create and follow a basic care plan covering a new resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of admission. The first days are when a new resident is most vulnerable. |
| Jan 9, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. |
| Jan 9, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. |
| Jan 9, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. |
| Jan 9, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not post its nurse staffing information every day. Nursing homes must publicly display how many nurses and aides are on duty each day. |
| Jan 9, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide necessary behavioral health care and services — support for residents' mental and emotional wellbeing, including conditions like depression and anxiety. |
| Jan 9, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. |
| Jan 9, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide or arrange dental services for its residents. Nursing homes are responsible for making sure residents can get dental care. |
| Jan 9, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. |
| Nov 1, 2024 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint |
| Nov 1, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint |
| May 3, 2024 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication. · from a complaint |
| May 3, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · from a complaint |
| Nov 22, 2023 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. |
| Nov 22, 2023 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not educate residents and staff about COVID-19 vaccination, offer the vaccine to those eligible after that education, or properly document everyone's vaccination status. |
| Nov 22, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not give residents (and their representatives and the ombudsman, a state advocate for residents) proper advance notice before a transfer or discharge, including information about their right to appeal. |
| Nov 22, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not coordinate resident assessments with the state's pre-admission screening program for mental illness and intellectual disabilities, or failed to refer residents for the special services they need. |
| Nov 22, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not properly plan a resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs after leaving. |
| Nov 22, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. |
| Nov 22, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline. |
| Nov 22, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. |
| Nov 22, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not keep residents' medications free from unnecessary drugs. Residents should only take medicines they truly need, at the right dose, for a clear reason. |
| Nov 22, 2023 | B · Minimal risk, repeated | The facility did not create and follow a basic care plan covering a new resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of admission. The first days are when a new resident is most vulnerable. |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (15 → 6).
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 10 | 0 | E |
| 2024 | 4 | 0 | E |
| 2025 | 16 | 0 | E |
| 2026 | 6 | 0 | D |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
| Measure | This facility | Washington avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.71 | 4.24 | 3.95 | bottom 27% in Washington; bottom 47% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.95 | 0.91 | 0.69 | top 35% in Washington; top 18% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 3.31 | 3.69 | 3.50 | bottom 35% in Washington; bottom 48% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.69 | 0.67 | 0.48 | top 43% in Washington; top 16% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 28.7 | 45.1 | 45.8 | top 10% in Washington; top 12% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 40.0 | 45.4 | 42.9 | top 42% in Washington; top 46% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.76, RN 0.96, weekend 3.35. Staffing rating: 4/5.
Self-reported quality measures
Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.
Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5
Who owns this facility
For profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pennant Healthcare LLC | Organization | Direct Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/01/2013 |
| Bhumkar, Nishita | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/01/2022 |
| Bhumkar, Nishita | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/01/2022 |
| Bhumkar, Nishita | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/10/2025 |
| Bodily, Brandon | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2013 |
| Bodily, Brandon | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2013 |
| Bodily, Brandon | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/10/2025 |
| Burnam, Soon | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/17/2013 |
| Burnam, Soon | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/10/2025 |
| Caretrust GP LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/01/2013 |
| Caretrust Reit INC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/01/2013 |
| Ctr Partnership LP | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/01/2013 |
| Ensign Services INC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2013 |
| Farnsworth, Stephen | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2024 |
| Holmes, Nathan | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2025 |
| Keetch, Chad | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/01/2011 |
| Port, Barry | Individual | Individual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/10/2025 |
| Sato, Ami | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/09/2024 |
| Tulalip Bay Health Holdings LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/01/2013 |
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "Can you give me examples of how your staff protect residents' dignity in everyday care, like bathing and dressing?"
- "How do you make sure each resident's care follows the doctor's orders, and what changed after this citation?"
- "What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
- "Can you show me how medications are stored and secured on the units, including controlled drugs?"
- "How do you decide you have enough staff and resources for your resident population, including nights and weekends?"
- "How do you keep residents' medical records accurate, complete, and secure?"
- "If my family member falls or their condition changes, exactly when and how will I be notified?"
- "Can we tour the resident rooms, bathrooms, and common areas today, including areas not on the usual tour route?"
- "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
- "Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"
Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marysville Care Center | 0.8 mi | Marysville, WA | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Bethany at Pacific | 4.5 mi | Everett, WA | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Everett Transitional Care Services | 5.6 mi | Everett, WA | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| View Ridge Care Center | 7.4 mi | Everett, WA | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Madison Post Acute | 8.0 mi | Everett, WA | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Snohomish Health and Rehabilitation of Cascadia | 9.4 mi | Snohomish, WA | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Arlington Health and Rehabilitation | 9.6 mi | Arlington, WA | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Bethany at Silver Lake | 11.1 mi | Everett, WA | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Everett Center | 11.4 mi | Everett, WA | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Regency Care Center at Monroe | 16.1 mi | Monroe, WA | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Alderwood Post Acute & Rehabilitation | 16.1 mi | Lynnwood, WA | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
| Josephine Caring Community | 16.3 mi | Stanwood, WA | ★★★★★ | 4/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
All facilities in Marysville →
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 505407.