WashingtonMarysville

Mountain View Rehabilitation and Care Center

5925 47th Avenue NE, Marysville, WA 98270 · Snohomish County · 82 certified beds · avg 84 residents/day · certified since Jan 1, 1992

Part of chain: THE ENSIGN GROUP (342 facilities, chain avg rating 3.2★)

4/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
3.71
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (36)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Jan 12, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · from a complaint
Jan 12, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Jan 12, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Jan 12, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Jan 12, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not conduct and document a facility-wide assessment of what staff, supplies, and resources it needs to care for its residents properly — during everyday operations, nights, weekends, and emergencies. · from a complaint
Jan 12, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards.
May 30, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away. · from a complaint
Jan 9, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · from a complaint
Jan 9, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not fully assess residents on time — a complete assessment of health, abilities, and needs is required when a resident is first admitted and at least once every 12 months after that.
Jan 9, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not properly complete the required screening (called PASARR) that identifies whether a person entering a nursing home has a mental illness or intellectual disability and needs specialized services.
Jan 9, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Jan 9, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits.
Jan 9, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not reassess a resident after a significant change in their condition, such as a sudden decline in health. A full new assessment is required when a resident's condition changes in a major way.
Jan 9, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not create and follow a basic care plan covering a new resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of admission. The first days are when a new resident is most vulnerable.
Jan 9, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
Jan 9, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
Jan 9, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Jan 9, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not post its nurse staffing information every day. Nursing homes must publicly display how many nurses and aides are on duty each day.
Jan 9, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide necessary behavioral health care and services — support for residents' mental and emotional wellbeing, including conditions like depression and anxiety.
Jan 9, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Jan 9, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide or arrange dental services for its residents. Nursing homes are responsible for making sure residents can get dental care.
Jan 9, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Nov 1, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint
Nov 1, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint
May 3, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication. · from a complaint
May 3, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · from a complaint
Nov 22, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Nov 22, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not educate residents and staff about COVID-19 vaccination, offer the vaccine to those eligible after that education, or properly document everyone's vaccination status.
Nov 22, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not give residents (and their representatives and the ombudsman, a state advocate for residents) proper advance notice before a transfer or discharge, including information about their right to appeal.
Nov 22, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not coordinate resident assessments with the state's pre-admission screening program for mental illness and intellectual disabilities, or failed to refer residents for the special services they need.
Nov 22, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not properly plan a resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs after leaving.
Nov 22, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
Nov 22, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline.
Nov 22, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections.
Nov 22, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents' medications free from unnecessary drugs. Residents should only take medicines they truly need, at the right dose, for a clear reason.
Nov 22, 2023B · Minimal risk, repeatedThe facility did not create and follow a basic care plan covering a new resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of admission. The first days are when a new resident is most vulnerable.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (15 → 6).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
2023100E
202440E
2025160E
202660D

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityWashington avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.714.243.95bottom 27% in Washington; bottom 47% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.950.910.69top 35% in Washington; top 18% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.313.693.50bottom 35% in Washington; bottom 48% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.690.670.48top 43% in Washington; top 16% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)28.745.145.8top 10% in Washington; top 12% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)40.045.442.9top 42% in Washington; top 46% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.76, RN 0.96, weekend 3.35. Staffing rating: 4/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Pennant Healthcare LLCOrganizationDirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2013
Bhumkar, NishitaIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE08/01/2022
Bhumkar, NishitaIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE08/01/2022
Bhumkar, NishitaIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/10/2025
Bodily, BrandonIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2013
Bodily, BrandonIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2013
Bodily, BrandonIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/10/2025
Burnam, SoonIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE04/17/2013
Burnam, SoonIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/10/2025
Caretrust GP LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2013
Caretrust Reit INCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2013
Ctr Partnership LPOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2013
Ensign Services INCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2013
Farnsworth, StephenIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2024
Holmes, NathanIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2025
Keetch, ChadIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE03/01/2011
Port, BarryIndividualIndividual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/10/2025
Sato, AmiIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE09/09/2024
Tulalip Bay Health Holdings LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2013

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Marysville Care Center0.8 miMarysville, WA★★★★☆3/5
Bethany at Pacific4.5 miEverett, WA★★★★☆3/5
Everett Transitional Care Services5.6 miEverett, WA★★★★☆4/5
View Ridge Care Center7.4 miEverett, WA★★★☆☆3/5
Madison Post Acute8.0 miEverett, WA★★★☆☆3/5
Snohomish Health and Rehabilitation of Cascadia9.4 miSnohomish, WA★★☆☆☆1/5
Arlington Health and Rehabilitation9.6 miArlington, WA★★★★☆3/5
Bethany at Silver Lake11.1 miEverett, WA★★★★★5/5
Everett Center11.4 miEverett, WA★★★☆☆3/5
Regency Care Center at Monroe16.1 miMonroe, WA★★★★☆3/5
Alderwood Post Acute & Rehabilitation16.1 miLynnwood, WA★★☆☆☆1/5abuse
Josephine Caring Community16.3 miStanwood, WA★★★★★4/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Marysville →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 505407.