How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
5129 Hilltop Road, Everett, WA 98203 (opens Google Maps) · Snohomish County · (425) 258-4474· 70 certified beds · avg 58 residents/day · certified since Dec 1, 1989 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: REGENCY PACIFIC MANAGEMENT (27 facilities, chain avg rating 3.9★)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Showing the latest 3 of 30 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not properly inform residents or their representatives about arbitration agreements — contracts that give up the right to sue in court — including their right to refuse to sign. F-0847
The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. F-0880
The facility did not honor residents' right to form and take part in resident or family groups, such as a resident council. F-0565
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Nov 24, 2025 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not properly inform residents or their representatives about arbitration agreements — contracts that give up the right to sue in court — including their right to refuse to sign. · F-0847 |
| Nov 24, 2025 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Nov 24, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not honor residents' right to form and take part in resident or family groups, such as a resident council. · F-0565 |
| Nov 24, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not give residents the required written notice of their rights, the facility's rules, the services offered, and what those services cost. · F-0572 |
| Nov 24, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · F-0641 |
| Nov 24, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not observe each nurse aide's job performance or provide regular training as required. · F-0730 |
| Nov 24, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not make sure its nurse aides had the skills needed to care for residents, including training in dementia care and abuse prevention. · F-0947 |
| Nov 24, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not allow a resident's chosen representative — often a family member or someone with power of attorney — to exercise the resident's rights on their behalf. When a resident can't speak for themselves, their representative steps into that role. · F-0551 |
| Nov 24, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · F-0609 |
| Nov 24, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| Nov 24, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility allowed residents to lose the ability to do daily activities — like bathing, dressing, and eating — when there was no medical reason for the decline. Good care helps residents keep the abilities they have. · F-0676 |
| Nov 24, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · F-0677 |
| Nov 24, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline. · F-0688 |
| Nov 24, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe, appropriate care for residents who need dialysis — the treatment that filters the blood when kidneys fail. · F-0698 |
| Nov 24, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · F-0842 |
| Aug 30, 2024 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Aug 30, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| Aug 30, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not reassess a resident after a significant change in their condition, such as a sudden decline in health. A full new assessment is required when a resident's condition changes in a major way. · F-0637 |
| Aug 30, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · F-0641 |
| Aug 30, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not properly complete the required screening (called PASARR) that identifies whether a person entering a nursing home has a mental illness or intellectual disability and needs specialized services. · F-0645 |
| Aug 30, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| Aug 30, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · F-0684 |
| Aug 30, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · F-0755 |
| Aug 30, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits. · F-0758 |
| Aug 30, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not properly run its feeding assistant program — assessing which residents are appropriate for it, following each resident's care plan, and making sure feeding assistants are trained and supervised. Feeding assistants are trained helpers who assist residents at mealtimes. · F-0811 |
| Aug 30, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| May 11, 2023 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| May 11, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline. · F-0688 |
| May 11, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · F-0695 |
| May 11, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · F-0842 |
Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (11 → 15).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 4 | 0 | F |
| 2024 | 11 | 0 | F |
| 2025 | 15 | 0 | F |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Washington avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.41 | 4.24 | 3.95 | bottom 8% in Washington; bottom 32% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.64 | 0.91 | 0.69 | bottom 17% in Washington; top 44% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 3.08 | 3.69 | 3.50 | bottom 17% in Washington; bottom 35% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.75 | 0.67 | 0.48 | top 32% in Washington; top 13% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 37.5 | 45.1 | 45.8 | top 29% in Washington; top 30% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 50.0 | 45.4 | 42.9 | bottom 40% in Washington; bottom 39% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.27, RN 0.80, weekend 3.85.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (4.27 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 3/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for View Ridge Care Center. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Limited Liability company
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Clay, James | Individual | Direct Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/01/2017 |
| Leebron Clay, Andrea | Individual | Direct Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/01/2017 |
| Clay, James | Individual | 5% or Greater Mortgage Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/01/2017 |
| Clay, James | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/01/2017 |
| Clay, James | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/01/2017 |
| Gabaldon, Brittney | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/07/2023 |
| Johnson, Patrick | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/21/2024 |
| Johnson, Patrick | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/14/2025 |
| Leebron Clay, Andrea | Individual | 5% or Greater Mortgage Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/01/2017 |
| Leebron Clay, Andrea | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/01/2017 |
| Leebron Clay, Andrea | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/01/2017 |
| Merl INC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/01/2017 |
| Nightingale Healthcare LLC. | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/01/2017 |
| Nightingale Healthcare LLC. | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/14/2025 |
| Premere Rehab LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/01/2017 |
| Sekeramayi, Floyd | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/01/2023 |
| Sekeramayi, Floyd | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/01/2023 |
All 17 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.
CMS lists this facility under the chain Regency Pacific Management — 27 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 26 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Madison Post Acute | 1.7 mi | Everett, WA | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Everett Transitional Care Services | 1.9 mi | Everett, WA | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Bethany at Pacific | 3.0 mi | Everett, WA | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Everett Center | 4.0 mi | Everett, WA | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Bethany at Silver Lake | 4.4 mi | Everett, WA | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Snohomish Health and Rehabilitation of Cascadia | 6.7 mi | Snohomish, WA | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Mountain View Rehabilitation and Care Center | 7.4 mi | Marysville, WA | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Marysville Care Center | 8.2 mi | Marysville, WA | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Alderwood Post Acute & Rehabilitation | 8.7 mi | Lynnwood, WA | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
| Lynnwood Post Acute Rehabilitation Center | 9.2 mi | Lynnwood, WA | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Bothell Health Care | 11.0 mi | Bothell, WA | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Pine Ridge Post Acute | 11.0 mi | Edmonds, WA | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
CMS records place this facility in Snohomish, WA — 17 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 505362.
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details