Regency Care Center at Monroe
1355 West Main Street, Monroe, WA 98272 · Snohomish County · 92 certified beds · avg 77 residents/day · certified since Oct 1, 1989
Part of chain: REGENCY PACIFIC MANAGEMENT (27 facilities, chain avg rating 3.9★)
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.
All citations in the current public record (33)
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 3, 2026 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint |
| May 7, 2025 | F · Potential for harm, facility-wide | The facility did not employ enough qualified food and nutrition staff, including a qualified dietician, to properly run its food service. |
| May 7, 2025 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not honor residents' right to voice complaints without discrimination or retaliation, or did not have a working complaint process that resolves issues promptly. |
| May 7, 2025 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. |
| May 7, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. |
| May 7, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility allowed residents to lose the ability to do daily activities — like bathing, dressing, and eating — when there was no medical reason for the decline. Good care helps residents keep the abilities they have. |
| May 7, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not help a resident get vision and hearing services — such as eye exams, glasses, hearing tests, or hearing aids. |
| May 7, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration. |
| May 7, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide safe, appropriate care for residents who need dialysis — the treatment that filters the blood when kidneys fail. |
| May 7, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide necessary behavioral health care and services — support for residents' mental and emotional wellbeing, including conditions like depression and anxiety. |
| May 7, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not keep residents' medications free from unnecessary drugs. Residents should only take medicines they truly need, at the right dose, for a clear reason. |
| May 7, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. |
| May 7, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not keep its building and grounds safe, functional, clean, and comfortable for residents, staff, and visitors. |
| Feb 26, 2024 | F · Potential for harm, facility-wide | The facility did not employ enough qualified food and nutrition staff, including a qualified dietician, to properly run its food service. |
| Feb 26, 2024 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline. |
| Feb 26, 2024 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not observe each nurse aide's job performance or provide regular training as required. |
| Feb 26, 2024 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. |
| Feb 26, 2024 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. |
| Feb 26, 2024 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not make sure its nurse aides had the skills needed to care for residents, including training in dementia care and abuse prevention. |
| Feb 26, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. |
| Feb 26, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. |
| Feb 26, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. |
| Dec 20, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not give residents proper notice about what Medicare or Medicaid covers, or about charges the resident might owe for services that aren't covered. · from a complaint |
| Sep 21, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide basic life support, such as CPR, before emergency medical help arrived — care that's required when it matches the doctor's orders and the resident's own written wishes. · from a complaint |
| Oct 4, 2022 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. |
| Oct 4, 2022 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. |
| Oct 4, 2022 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. |
| Oct 4, 2022 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not have a working program to monitor how antibiotics are used. Tracking antibiotic use helps make sure these drugs are given only when needed and remain effective. |
| Oct 4, 2022 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not honor residents' right to make their own choices about their daily lives, such as when to wake up, what to eat, or how to spend their time. |
| Oct 4, 2022 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. |
| Oct 4, 2022 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. |
| Oct 4, 2022 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. |
| Oct 4, 2022 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (9 → 12).
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 9 | 0 | E |
| 2023 | 2 | 0 | D |
| 2024 | 9 | 0 | F |
| 2025 | 12 | 0 | F |
| 2026 | 1 | 0 | D |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
| Measure | This facility | Washington avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 4.67 | 4.24 | 3.95 | top 17% in Washington; top 19% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 1.24 | 0.91 | 0.69 | top 12% in Washington; top 9% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 4.26 | 3.69 | 3.50 | top 10% in Washington; top 16% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.81 | 0.67 | 0.48 | top 26% in Washington; top 11% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 31.7 | 45.1 | 45.8 | top 16% in Washington; top 17% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 20.0 | 45.4 | 42.9 | top 5% in Washington; top 13% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.08, RN 1.08, weekend 3.72. Staffing rating: 5/5.
Self-reported quality measures
Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.
Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 2/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5
Who owns this facility
For profit - Limited Liability company
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beddoe, Marvin | Individual | Direct Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2010 |
| Beddoe, Sandra | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/01/2017 |
| BD Monroe Properties LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2020 |
| Beddoe, Marvin | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2010 |
| Beddoe, Marvin | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2010 |
| Beddoe, Sandra | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/01/2017 |
| Nordstrom, Jodi | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/08/1996 |
| Nordstrom, Jodi | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/08/1996 |
| Omnicare LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/01/2013 |
| Rapp, Andrew | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/08/2016 |
| Rapp, Andrew | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/08/2016 |
| Raskind, Daniel | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/01/2019 |
| Raskind, Daniel | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/01/2019 |
| Regency Pacific Management LLC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2010 |
| Regency Pacific Management LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/05/2025 |
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "Tell me about this abuse or neglect citation — what happened, and what specific changes did you make afterward?"
- "Do you have a qualified dietician on staff, and how involved are they in each resident's nutrition plan?"
- "Walk me through what happens when a resident or family files a grievance — who responds and how fast?"
- "Who leads your infection prevention program, and how do you make sure staff follow practices like hand hygiene every day?"
- "Who completes resident assessments here, and how do you check them for accuracy?"
- "How do you help residents maintain their daily living skills, and how do you measure whether it's working?"
- "How do you arrange eye and hearing care for residents, including appointments and equipment like glasses or hearing aids?"
- "How do you monitor residents' weight and eating, and what happens when someone starts losing weight?"
- "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
- "Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"
Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Snohomish Health and Rehabilitation of Cascadia | 6.9 mi | Snohomish, WA | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Bethany at Silver Lake | 10.1 mi | Everett, WA | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Madison Post Acute | 11.4 mi | Everett, WA | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Corwin Center at Emerald Heights | 12.0 mi | Redmond, WA | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Bothell Health Care | 12.3 mi | Bothell, WA | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Everett Center | 12.9 mi | Everett, WA | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| View Ridge Care Center | 13.1 mi | Everett, WA | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Alderwood Post Acute & Rehabilitation | 13.5 mi | Lynnwood, WA | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
| Bethany at Pacific | 13.6 mi | Everett, WA | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Everett Transitional Care Services | 13.7 mi | Everett, WA | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Redmond Care and Rehabilitation Center | 14.0 mi | Redmond, WA | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Life Care Center of Kirkland | 14.2 mi | Kirkland, WA | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 505350.