WashingtonMonroe

Regency Care Center at Monroe

1355 West Main Street, Monroe, WA 98272 · Snohomish County · 92 certified beds · avg 77 residents/day · certified since Oct 1, 1989

Part of chain: REGENCY PACIFIC MANAGEMENT (27 facilities, chain avg rating 3.9★)

3/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
4.67
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (33)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Jun 3, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
May 7, 2025F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not employ enough qualified food and nutrition staff, including a qualified dietician, to properly run its food service.
May 7, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not honor residents' right to voice complaints without discrimination or retaliation, or did not have a working complaint process that resolves issues promptly.
May 7, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
May 7, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
May 7, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility allowed residents to lose the ability to do daily activities — like bathing, dressing, and eating — when there was no medical reason for the decline. Good care helps residents keep the abilities they have.
May 7, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not help a resident get vision and hearing services — such as eye exams, glasses, hearing tests, or hearing aids.
May 7, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration.
May 7, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe, appropriate care for residents who need dialysis — the treatment that filters the blood when kidneys fail.
May 7, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide necessary behavioral health care and services — support for residents' mental and emotional wellbeing, including conditions like depression and anxiety.
May 7, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents' medications free from unnecessary drugs. Residents should only take medicines they truly need, at the right dose, for a clear reason.
May 7, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards.
May 7, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep its building and grounds safe, functional, clean, and comfortable for residents, staff, and visitors.
Feb 26, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not employ enough qualified food and nutrition staff, including a qualified dietician, to properly run its food service.
Feb 26, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline.
Feb 26, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not observe each nurse aide's job performance or provide regular training as required.
Feb 26, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards.
Feb 26, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Feb 26, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not make sure its nurse aides had the skills needed to care for residents, including training in dementia care and abuse prevention.
Feb 26, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Feb 26, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Feb 26, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Dec 20, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not give residents proper notice about what Medicare or Medicaid covers, or about charges the resident might owe for services that aren't covered. · from a complaint
Sep 21, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide basic life support, such as CPR, before emergency medical help arrived — care that's required when it matches the doctor's orders and the resident's own written wishes. · from a complaint
Oct 4, 2022E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs.
Oct 4, 2022E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
Oct 4, 2022E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Oct 4, 2022E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have a working program to monitor how antibiotics are used. Tracking antibiotic use helps make sure these drugs are given only when needed and remain effective.
Oct 4, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' right to make their own choices about their daily lives, such as when to wake up, what to eat, or how to spend their time.
Oct 4, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Oct 4, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Oct 4, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Oct 4, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (9 → 12).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202290E
202320D
202490F
2025120F
202610D

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityWashington avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)4.674.243.95top 17% in Washington; top 19% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours1.240.910.69top 12% in Washington; top 9% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing4.263.693.50top 10% in Washington; top 16% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.810.670.48top 26% in Washington; top 11% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)31.745.145.8top 16% in Washington; top 17% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)20.045.442.9top 5% in Washington; top 13% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.08, RN 1.08, weekend 3.72. Staffing rating: 5/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 2/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Limited Liability company

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Beddoe, MarvinIndividualDirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2010
Beddoe, SandraIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2017
BD Monroe Properties LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2020
Beddoe, MarvinIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2010
Beddoe, MarvinIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2010
Beddoe, SandraIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2017
Nordstrom, JodiIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE07/08/1996
Nordstrom, JodiIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/08/1996
Omnicare LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE09/01/2013
Rapp, AndrewIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE03/08/2016
Rapp, AndrewIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/08/2016
Raskind, DanielIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2019
Raskind, DanielIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2019
Regency Pacific Management LLCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2010
Regency Pacific Management LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/05/2025

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Snohomish Health and Rehabilitation of Cascadia6.9 miSnohomish, WA★★☆☆☆1/5
Bethany at Silver Lake10.1 miEverett, WA★★★★★5/5
Madison Post Acute11.4 miEverett, WA★★★☆☆3/5
Corwin Center at Emerald Heights12.0 miRedmond, WA★★★★☆3/5
Bothell Health Care12.3 miBothell, WA★★☆☆☆2/5
Everett Center12.9 miEverett, WA★★★☆☆3/5
View Ridge Care Center13.1 miEverett, WA★★★☆☆3/5
Alderwood Post Acute & Rehabilitation13.5 miLynnwood, WA★★☆☆☆1/5abuse
Bethany at Pacific13.6 miEverett, WA★★★★☆3/5
Everett Transitional Care Services13.7 miEverett, WA★★★★☆4/5
Redmond Care and Rehabilitation Center14.0 miRedmond, WA★★★★★4/5
Life Care Center of Kirkland14.2 miKirkland, WA★★☆☆☆2/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Monroe →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 505350.