How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
Monument Healthcare Stonecreek
523 North Main Street, Bountiful, UT 84010 (opens Google Maps) · Davis County · (801) 951-2273· 122 certified beds · avg 77 residents/day · certified since Jul 16, 2004 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: MONUMENT HEALTH GROUP (11 facilities, chain avg rating 2.8★)
4/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
inspected Apr 29, 2024
2
Serious findings on record
most recent Jan 3, 2024
$0
Fines, last 3 years
3.43
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)
Every record stays on this page.
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5 · how star ratings work →
⚠ The most recent standard health inspection was more than 2 years ago — conditions may have changed.
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Jan 3, 2024 · F-0684 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Jan 3, 2024 · F-0684 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Why it matters: Care that strays from doctor's orders or ignores the resident's wishes can lead to declining health and avoidable harm.
Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Feb 1, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Feb 20, 2020 · F-0600
The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Feb 20, 2020 · F-0600
The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.
Why it matters: Abuse and neglect cause direct physical and emotional harm and are among the most serious failures a nursing home can have.
Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Jan 8, 2020 (Past Non-Compliance)
Inspection findings in the public record
Showing the latest 3 of 16 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint F-0689
The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint F-0684
The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · from a complaint F-0755
View all 16 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 25, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint · F-0689 |
| Jan 5, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint · F-0684 |
| Jan 5, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · from a complaint · F-0755 |
| Jan 5, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication. · from a complaint · F-0760 |
| Apr 29, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| Apr 29, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689 |
| Apr 29, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it. · F-0697 |
| Apr 29, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide necessary behavioral health care and services — support for residents' mental and emotional wellbeing, including conditions like depression and anxiety. · F-0740 |
| Jan 3, 2024 | ▲ G · Actual harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint · F-0684 |
| Jan 3, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away. · from a complaint · F-0580 |
| Feb 20, 2020 | ▲ G · Actual harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · F-0600 |
| Feb 20, 2020 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · F-0550 |
| Feb 20, 2020 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · F-0609 |
| Feb 20, 2020 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · F-0641 |
| Feb 20, 2020 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Feb 20, 2020 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep its building and grounds safe, functional, clean, and comfortable for residents, staff, and visitors. · F-0921 |
Inspection trend by year
All citationsSerious citations (G–L)
2020
All citations: 6
Serious citations (G–L): 1
2024
All citations: 6
Serious citations (G–L): 1
2026
All citations: 4
Serious citations (G–L): 0
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | 6 | 1 | G ▲ |
| 2024 | 6 | 1 | G ▲ |
| 2026 | 4 | 0 | D |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
What these staffing numbers mean →
This facilityUtah averageU.S. average
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)
This facility: 3.43
Utah average: 3.87
U.S. average: 3.95
Registered Nurse hours
This facility: 1.35
Utah average: 1.17
U.S. average: 0.69
Weekend total nurse staffing
This facility: 3.02
Utah average: 3.39
U.S. average: 3.50
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Utah avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.43 | 3.87 | 3.95 | bottom 36% in Utah; bottom 33% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 1.35 | 1.17 | 0.69 | top 24% in Utah; top 6% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 3.02 | 3.39 | 3.50 | bottom 39% in Utah; bottom 32% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 1.04 | 0.88 | 0.48 | top 22% in Utah; top 5% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 53.8 | 50.7 | 45.8 | bottom 41% in Utah; bottom 28% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 43.3 | 40.6 | 42.9 | bottom 46% in Utah; bottom 46% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.54, RN 1.39, weekend 3.11.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.54 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 3/5.
Quality measures: assessments & claims
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 2/5
Costs & payment
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Monument Healthcare Stonecreek. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Calculate a stay from a quote you receive
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Before you compare prices
- Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
- Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
- Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
Who owns this facility
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
Government - Hospital district
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Clawson, Travis | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/07/2025 |
| Clawson, Travis | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/07/2025 |
| Fragoso, Lindsay | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/07/2025 |
| Fragoso, Lindsay | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/07/2025 |
| Galindo, Michael | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/07/2025 |
| Galindo, Michael | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/07/2025 |
| Gunnison Valley Hospital | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2018 |
| Gunnison Valley Hospital | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/28/2025 |
| Health Group Management LLC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/07/2025 |
| Health Group Management LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/28/2025 |
| Marriott, Stephen | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/07/2025 |
| Marriott, Stephen | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/07/2025 |
| Merkley, David | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/16/2026 |
| Merkley, David | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/16/2026 |
| Monument Health Group LLC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/07/2025 |
| Monument Health Group LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/28/2025 |
| Monument Health Properties LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/07/2025 |
| Monument Real Estate North Bountiful LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/07/2025 |
| Murray, Brian | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2020 |
| Murray, Brian | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2020 |
Showing 20 of 33 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 13 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.
Other facilities in the same chain
CMS lists this facility under the chain Monument Health Group — 11 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
- Monument Healthcare Taylorsville — Salt Lake City, UT · overall 2/5
- Monument Healthcare American Fork — American Fork, UT · overall 3/5
- Monument Healthcare Bountiful — Bountiful, UT · overall 3/5
- Monument Healthcare Brigham City — Brigham City, UT · overall 2/5abuse
- Monument Healthcare Canyon Rim — Millcreek, UT · overall 3/5
- Monument Healthcare Cottonwood Creek — Salt Lake City, UT · overall 3/5
- Monument Healthcare Millcreek — Salt Lake City, UT · overall 4/5
- Monument Healthcare Murray Creek — Millcreek, UT · overall 2/5abuse
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 10 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "How do you make sure each resident's care follows the doctor's orders, and what changed after this citation?"
- "Tell me about this abuse or neglect citation — what happened, and what specific changes did you make afterward?"
- "What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
- "How does your pharmacist review residents' medications, and how quickly can you fill new or urgent prescriptions?"
- "What systems do you use to prevent medication errors, and what happens when one occurs?"
- "Can you show me how medications are stored and secured on the units, including controlled drugs?"
- "How do you assess and manage residents' pain, especially for those who have trouble communicating?"
- "What mental health services do you provide on-site, and who delivers them?"
Also worth asking anywhere
- "Your weekend nurse staffing is reported below the Utah midpoint — how does the weekend schedule differ from a weekday?"
- "Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
- "CMS reports 54% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
- "The ownership record on file lists 33 owning or managing parties — who makes the decisions about staffing levels?"
- "Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"
Nearby facilities (12 closest of 38 within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| South Davis Specialty Care | 0.9 mi | Bountiful, UT | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Monument Healthcare Bountiful | 2.4 mi | Bountiful, UT | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Midtown Manor | 9.1 mi | Salt Lake City, UT | ★☆☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| City Creek Post Acute | 9.3 mi | Salt Lake City, UT | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Maple Ridge Rehabilitation and Nursing | 9.4 mi | Salt Lake City, UT | ★☆☆☆☆ | 2/5 | abuse |
| Pine Creek Rehabilitation and Nursing | 9.8 mi | Salt Lake City, UT | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | abuse |
| William E Christofferson Salt Lake Veterans Home | 10.0 mi | Salt Lake City, UT | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| St Joseph Villa | 11.5 mi | Salt Lake City, UT | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Monument Healthcare South Salt Lake | 12.3 mi | Salt Lake City, UT | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | SFF |
| Meadow Brook Rehabilitation and Nursing | 12.6 mi | Salt Lake City, UT | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
| Alpine Meadow Rehabilitation and Nursing | 12.7 mi | West Valley City, UT | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Millcreek Rehabilitation and Nursing | 12.8 mi | Salt Lake City, UT | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
Other facilities in the same county
CMS records place this facility in Davis, UT — 6 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
- Rocky Mountain Care- Clearfield — Clearfield, UT · overall 2/5
- Thatcher Brook Rehabilitation & Care Center — Clearfield, UT · overall 5/5
- Fairfield Village Rehabilitation — Layton, UT · overall 3/5
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 465156.
This page is the printable visit checklist. If your browser did not open the print dialog automatically, use File → Print (Ctrl/⌘-P).