UtahBrigham City

Monument Healthcare Brigham City

775 North 200 East, Brigham City, UT 84302 · Box Elder County · 84 certified beds · avg 31 residents/day · certified since Aug 1, 1984

Abuse citation flag (CMS)

Part of chain: MONUMENT HEALTH GROUP (11 facilities, chain avg rating 2.8★)

The abuse flag means inspectors cited this facility for abuse that caused harm to a resident within the past year, or potential for harm in each of the last two years. Source: CMS.

1/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
3
Serious findings on record
$10,166
Fines, last 3 years
0.00
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★☆☆☆☆1/5 · CMS overall rating: 2/5

⚠ The most recent standard health inspection was more than 2 years ago — conditions may have changed.

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Apr 16, 2024 · F-0600 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.

Why it matters: Abuse and neglect cause direct physical and emotional harm and are among the most serious failures a nursing home can have.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

Corrected: May 17, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Dec 3, 2025 · F-0600 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.

Why it matters: Abuse and neglect cause direct physical and emotional harm and are among the most serious failures a nursing home can have.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Dec 20, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Feb 20, 2020 · F-0757

The facility did not keep residents' medications free from unnecessary drugs. Residents should only take medicines they truly need, at the right dose, for a clear reason.

Why it matters: Unneeded drugs expose residents to side effects, drowsiness, falls, and dangerous interactions.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Dec 4, 2019 (Past Non-Compliance)

All citations in the current public record (21)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Jul 1, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it. · from a complaint
Dec 3, 2025▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
Apr 16, 2024▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
Apr 16, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Apr 16, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · from a complaint
Apr 16, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature.
Apr 16, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not serve meals and snacks at times that fit residents' needs, preferences, and requests, or did not offer nourishing alternatives for residents who want to eat outside scheduled meal times.
Apr 16, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft. These written safeguards are the foundation of resident protection.
Apr 16, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Apr 16, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Jun 27, 2022E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not fully assess residents on time — a complete assessment of health, abilities, and needs is required when a resident is first admitted and at least once every 12 months after that.
Jun 27, 2022E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not update each resident's care assessment at least once every 3 months. These regular check-ins keep the resident's care plan matched to their current condition.
Jun 27, 2022E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not enter each resident's assessment information into the required format and send it to the state within 7 days of completing the assessment, as the rules require.
Jun 27, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not reassess a resident after a significant change in their condition, such as a sudden decline in health. A full new assessment is required when a resident's condition changes in a major way.
Jun 27, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
Jun 27, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents' medications free from unnecessary drugs. Residents should only take medicines they truly need, at the right dose, for a clear reason.
Feb 20, 2020▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents' medications free from unnecessary drugs. Residents should only take medicines they truly need, at the right dose, for a clear reason.
Feb 20, 2020E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist.
Feb 20, 2020E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not keep complete, dated laboratory records in residents' files.
Feb 20, 2020D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not give residents (and their representatives and the ombudsman, a state advocate for residents) proper advance notice before a transfer or discharge, including information about their right to appeal.
Feb 20, 2020D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide timely, quality laboratory tests to meet residents' needs.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (6 → 8).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202051G ▲
202260E
202481J ▲
202511G ▲
202610D

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

1 fine totaling $10,166.

DateTypeAmount / length
Dec 3, 2025Fine$10,166

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityUtah avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)0.003.873.95
Registered Nurse hours0.001.170.69
Weekend total nurse staffing0.003.393.50
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.000.880.48
Total nursing staff turnover (%)0.050.745.8
RN turnover (%)0.040.642.9

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 0.00, RN 0.00, weekend 0.00. Staffing rating: 1/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: —/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Limited Liability company

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Gunnison Valley HospitalOrganizationDirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2018
Clawson, TravisIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE02/07/2025
Clawson, TravisIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE02/07/2025
Espinosa, StephanieIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE02/07/2025
Espinosa, StephanieIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE02/07/2025
Fragoso, LindsayIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE02/07/2025
Fragoso, LindsayIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE02/07/2025
Gunnison Valley HospitalOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2018
Gunnison Valley HospitalOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/04/2025
Health Group Management LLCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE02/07/2025
Health Group Management LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/04/2025
Marriott, StephenIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE02/07/2025
Monument Health Group LLCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE02/07/2025
Monument Health Group LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/04/2025
Murray, BrianIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2018
Murray, BrianIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2018
Murray, BrianIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2018
Nixon, TylerIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE02/07/2025
Nixon, TylerIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE02/07/2025
Ostermiller, MercedesIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE02/07/2025

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Monument Healthcare Pioneer Trail2.2 miBrigham City, UT★★★★☆3/5
MSM Brigham City LLC2.5 miBrigham City, UT★★★☆☆2/5
Sunshine Terrace Skilled Nursing17.0 miLogan, UT★☆☆☆☆1/5
George E. Wahlen Ogden Veterans Home17.2 miOgden, UT★★★★☆2/5
Lomond Peak Nursing and Rehabilitation, LLC17.7 miOgden, UT★★★☆☆2/5
Logan Regional Hospital Transitional Care Unit18.7 miLogan, UT★★★★★5/5
Rocky Mountain Care - Logan18.9 miLogan, UT★★★☆☆2/5
Maple Springs Senior Living19.6 miNorth Logan, UT★★★☆☆3/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Brigham City →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 465093.