How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
Medilodge of Plymouth
395 W Ann Arbor Trail, Plymouth, MI 48170 (opens Google Maps) · Wayne County · (734) 453-3983· 39 certified beds · avg 35 residents/day · certified since Jun 5, 1991 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: MEDILODGE (53 facilities, chain avg rating 3.1★)
5/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
inspected Jul 17, 2025
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
3.98
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)
Every record stays on this page.
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★★★5/5 · CMS overall rating: 5/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Inspection findings in the public record
Showing the latest 3 of 17 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility had resident rooms smaller than required — at least 80 square feet per person in shared rooms and 100 square feet in single rooms. F-0912
The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. F-0550
The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. F-0609
View all 17 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Jul 17, 2025 | B · Potential for minimal harm, pattern | The facility had resident rooms smaller than required — at least 80 square feet per person in shared rooms and 100 square feet in single rooms. · F-0912 |
| Jul 25, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · F-0550 |
| Jul 25, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · F-0609 |
| Jul 25, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide proper foot care for residents. Foot care includes routine care like nail trimming and attention to foot problems, which matter greatly for older adults. · F-0687 |
| Jul 25, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · F-0695 |
| Jul 25, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide food that accounts for each resident's allergies, intolerances, and personal preferences, or did not offer appealing alternatives. · F-0806 |
| Jul 25, 2024 | B · Potential for minimal harm, pattern | The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · F-0658 |
| Jul 25, 2024 | B · Potential for minimal harm, pattern | The facility had resident rooms smaller than required — at least 80 square feet per person in shared rooms and 100 square feet in single rooms. · F-0912 |
| Apr 20, 2023 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not employ enough qualified food and nutrition staff, including a qualified dietician, to properly run its food service. · F-0801 |
| Apr 20, 2023 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not have enough support staff to safely and effectively run its food and nutrition service. · F-0802 |
| Apr 20, 2023 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility's menus did not meet residents' nutritional needs, or were not prepared in advance, followed as written, kept up to date, or reviewed by a dietician. · F-0803 |
| Apr 20, 2023 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Apr 20, 2023 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not dispose of garbage and refuse properly. · F-0814 |
| Apr 20, 2023 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not keep all essential equipment working safely — things like heating and cooling systems, kitchen equipment, and medical devices. · F-0908 |
| Apr 20, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. · F-0690 |
| Apr 20, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration. · F-0692 |
| Apr 20, 2023 | B · Potential for minimal harm, pattern | The facility had resident rooms smaller than required — at least 80 square feet per person in shared rooms and 100 square feet in single rooms. · F-0912 |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (7 → 1).
All citationsSerious citations (G–L)
2023
All citations: 9
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2024
All citations: 7
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2025
All citations: 1
Serious citations (G–L): 0
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 9 | 0 | F |
| 2024 | 7 | 0 | D |
| 2025 | 1 | 0 | B |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
What these staffing numbers mean →
This facilityMichigan averageU.S. average
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)
This facility: 3.98
Michigan average: 4.32
U.S. average: 3.95
Registered Nurse hours
This facility: 1.22
Michigan average: 0.84
U.S. average: 0.69
Weekend total nurse staffing
This facility: 3.26
Michigan average: 3.79
U.S. average: 3.50
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Michigan avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.98 | 4.32 | 3.95 | bottom 41% in Michigan; top 40% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 1.22 | 0.84 | 0.69 | top 14% in Michigan; top 9% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 3.26 | 3.79 | 3.50 | bottom 22% in Michigan; bottom 45% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.70 | 0.49 | 0.48 | top 18% in Michigan; top 16% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 53.8 | 44.1 | 45.8 | bottom 22% in Michigan; bottom 28% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 20.0 | 39.2 | 42.9 | top 13% in Michigan; top 13% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.95, RN 1.21, weekend 3.24.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.95 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 4/5.
Quality measures: assessments & claims
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5
Costs & payment
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Medilodge of Plymouth. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Calculate a stay from a quote you receive
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Before you compare prices
- Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
- Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
- Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
Who owns this facility
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Limited Liability company
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| B&y Healthcare S Corp | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 06/24/2013 |
| B&y Trust | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 06/24/2013 |
| Cody Healthcare S Corp | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 06/24/2013 |
| Craig Flashner 2007 Trust | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 06/24/2013 |
| Fifteeninone Opco Group LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 100% | 06/24/2013 |
| Flashner, Craig | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/24/2013 |
| Generations Healthcare Management LLC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/24/2013 |
| Kirk, Kristine | Individual | W-2 Managing Employee | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2018 |
| Norcross, Robert | Individual | Contracted Managing Employee | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/24/2013 |
| Perlstein, Yitzchok | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/24/2013 |
| Prestige Administrative Services, LLC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2016 |
| Rogers, Stacey | Individual | Contracted Managing Employee | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/20/2014 |
All 12 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.
Other facilities in the same chain
CMS lists this facility under the chain Medilodge — 53 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
- Medilodge of Port Huron — Fort Gratiot, MI · overall 5/5
- Medilodge of Portage — Portage, MI · overall 3/5
- Medilodge of Richmond — Richmond, MI · overall 4/5
- Medilodge of Rogers City — Rogers City, MI · overall 5/5
- Medilodge of Sault Ste. Marie — Sault Ste. Marie, MI · overall 1/5abuseSFF
- Medilodge of Shoreline — Sterling Heights, MI · overall 3/5
- Medilodge of Southfield — Southfield, MI · overall 1/5abuseSFF
- Medilodge of St. Clair — East China, MI · overall 2/5
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 52 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "Can I see the actual room my family member would live in before we decide?"
- "Can you give me examples of how your staff protect residents' dignity in everyday care, like bathing and dressing?"
- "When abuse or theft is suspected, who do you notify, how fast, and how do you inform the family?"
- "How is routine foot care handled here, and does a podiatrist visit regularly?"
- "How many residents here use oxygen or breathing equipment, and who checks that equipment each shift?"
- "How do you track each resident's food allergies and preferences, and what happens if they don't like what's served?"
- "Can you tell me what this citation involved and what steps you took to bring care back up to standard?"
- "Do you have a qualified dietician on staff, and how involved are they in each resident's nutrition plan?"
Also worth asking anywhere
- "Your weekend nurse staffing is reported below the Michigan midpoint — how does the weekend schedule differ from a weekday?"
- "Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
- "CMS reports 54% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
- "Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"
Nearby facilities (12 closest of 82 within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Medilodge of Haggerty Road | 1.6 mi | Plymouth, MI | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Optalis Health and Rehabilitation of Canton | 2.3 mi | Canton, MI | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
| Four Seasons Nursing Center of Westland | 3.1 mi | Westland, MI | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | abuse |
| Marywood Nursing Care Center | 3.3 mi | Livonia, MI | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Westland, a Villa Center | 3.9 mi | Westland, MI | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
| Regency at Westland | 4.4 mi | Westland, MI | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Northville Manor | 4.4 mi | Northville, MI | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Cherry Hill for Nursing and Rehabilitation | 4.8 mi | Westland, MI | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Majestic Care of Livonia | 5.5 mi | Livonia, MI | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Regency at Canton | 6.5 mi | Canton, MI | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Regency at Livonia | 6.9 mi | Livonia, MI | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| The Manor of Novi | 6.9 mi | Novi, MI | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
Other facilities in the same county
CMS records place this facility in Wayne, MI — 63 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
- Medilodge of Taylor — Taylor, MI · overall 3/5
- Mission Point Nursing & Physical Rehab Center of D — Detroit, MI · overall 4/5
- Mission Point Nursing & Physical Rehabilitation Ce — Detroit, MI · overall 1/5
- Mission Point Nursing & Physical Rehabilitation Ce — Detroit, MI · overall 3/5
- Oakpointe Senior Care and Rehab Center — Detroit, MI · overall 5/5
- Omni Continuing Care — Detroit, MI · overall 4/5
- Optalis Health and Rehabilitation of Allen Park — Allen Park, MI · overall 3/5
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 235507.