MichiganAllen Park

Optalis Health and Rehabilitation of Allen Park

9150 Allen Rd, Allen Park, MI 48101 · Wayne County · 163 certified beds · avg 116 residents/day · certified since Oct 1, 1985

Part of chain: OPTALIS HEALTH & REHABILITATION (36 facilities, chain avg rating 2.4★)

3/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
3.56
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (46)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Apr 16, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide or obtain laboratory tests when a doctor ordered them, or did not promptly report the results back to the doctor who ordered them. · from a complaint
Jul 23, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
Jul 23, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint
Jul 23, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · from a complaint
Jun 4, 2025F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Jun 4, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures for offering residents flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
Jun 4, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Jun 4, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
Jun 4, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Jun 4, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility used feeding tubes without a valid medical reason or the resident's agreement, or did not provide proper care to residents who have feeding tubes.
Jun 4, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe, appropriate care for residents who need dialysis — the treatment that filters the blood when kidneys fail.
Jun 4, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · from a complaint
Jun 4, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide or arrange dental services for its residents. Nursing homes are responsible for making sure residents can get dental care.
Jun 4, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards.
Feb 11, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
Jul 16, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Jul 2, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Jul 2, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care.
Jul 2, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not coordinate resident assessments with the state's pre-admission screening program for mental illness and intellectual disabilities, or failed to refer residents for the special services they need.
Jul 2, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Jul 2, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.
Jul 2, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration.
Jul 2, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time.
Jul 2, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures for offering residents flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
Jul 2, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not educate residents and staff about COVID-19 vaccination, offer the vaccine to those eligible after that education, or properly document everyone's vaccination status.
Jul 2, 2024B · Minimal risk, repeatedThe facility housed residents in rooms below ground level, which is not allowed.
May 8, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Apr 11, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · from a complaint
Mar 20, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint
Mar 20, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint
Nov 30, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · from a complaint
Nov 30, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. · from a complaint
Oct 25, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint
Oct 25, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · from a complaint
Aug 9, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from misuse of their belongings or money — this is called misappropriation, and it includes theft or improper use of a resident's property or funds. · from a complaint
Aug 9, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · from a complaint
Jul 12, 2023F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Jul 12, 2023F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not designate a qualified infection preventionist — a trained person responsible for running the infection prevention and control program.
Jul 12, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Jul 12, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility had resident rooms smaller than required — at least 80 square feet per person in shared rooms and 100 square feet in single rooms.
Jul 12, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not post the names, addresses, and phone numbers of state agencies and advocacy groups, along with a notice that residents may file complaints with the state survey agency.
Jul 12, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
Jul 12, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have a working program to monitor how antibiotics are used. Tracking antibiotic use helps make sure these drugs are given only when needed and remain effective.
Jul 12, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep its building and grounds safe, functional, clean, and comfortable for residents, staff, and visitors.
Jul 12, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not maintain an effective pest control program to prevent or deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
Jul 12, 2023B · Minimal risk, repeatedThe facility housed residents in rooms below ground level, which is not allowed.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (10 → 10).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
2023160F
2024150F
2025140F
202610D

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityMichigan avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.564.323.95bottom 12% in Michigan; bottom 40% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.330.840.69bottom 7% in Michigan; bottom 13% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.083.793.50bottom 10% in Michigan; bottom 35% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.130.490.48bottom 3% in Michigan; bottom 3% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)45.444.145.8bottom 47% in Michigan; bottom 49% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)62.539.242.9bottom 12% in Michigan; bottom 19% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.86, RN 0.36, weekend 3.34. Staffing rating: 2/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Om Holdco 5 LLCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%04/07/2023
Optalis LP Investors 5 LLCOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest10%04/07/2023
Optum Management Solutions. INCOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE04/07/2023
SNW LLCOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest30%04/07/2023
Atto, GhassanIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2025
Charles Franklin LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE12/30/2025
Cliftonlarsonallen LLPOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2025
Denhart, CorinnaIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2025
Forbright BankOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/26/2026
Hemant Shah 2018 Irrevocable TrustOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE12/30/2025
Obs of Mi LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2025
Om Holdco 5 LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE05/11/2026
Optalis LP Investors 5 LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE12/30/2025
Paar 108 LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE12/30/2025
Piccininni, JudyIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2025
Piccininni, JudyIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE05/11/2026
Pinal R. Patel 2017 Irrevocable Trust F/B/O Aarna R. PatelOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE12/30/2025
Pinal R. Patel 2017 Irrevocable Trust F/B/O Ansh R. PatelOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE12/30/2025
Pinal R. Patel 2020 Irrevocable Family Trust Uad 10-6-2020OrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE12/30/2025
Rajan G Patel 2020 Irr Fam Tr Uad 12-3-2020OrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE12/30/2025

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
The Lodge at Taylor2.8 miTaylor, MI★★★☆☆3/5
Medilodge of Taylor3.0 miTaylor, MI★★★☆☆2/5
Regency, a Villa Center3.1 miTaylor, MI★★☆☆☆2/5
The Orchards at Southgate3.5 miSouthgate, MI★★★★★4/5
Rivergate Terrace4.2 miRiverview, MI★★★☆☆3/5
Rivergate Health Care Center4.3 miRiverview, MI★★★★☆4/5
Riverside Commons Rehab and Nursing Center, LLC4.3 miDearborn, MI★★★☆☆2/5
Imperial, a Villa Center4.4 miDearborn Heights, MI★★☆☆☆2/5
Belle Fountain Nursing & Rehabilitation Center4.8 miRiverview, MI★★★☆☆2/5abuse
Allegria Village6.2 miDearborn, MI★★★★☆4/5
Aerius Health Center6.2 miRiverview, MI★★★★★5/5
Optalis Health and Rehabilitation of Dearborn Heig6.8 miDearborn Heights, MI★★☆☆☆2/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Allen Park →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 235439.