How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
Optalis Health and Rehabilitation of Allen Park
9150 Allen Rd, Allen Park, MI 48101 (opens Google Maps) · Wayne County · (313) 386-2150· 163 certified beds · avg 116 residents/day · certified since Oct 1, 1985 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: OPTALIS HEALTH & REHABILITATION (36 facilities, chain avg rating 2.4★)
3/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
inspected Jun 4, 2025
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
3.56
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)
Every record stays on this page.
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Inspection findings in the public record
Showing the latest 3 of 46 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not provide or obtain laboratory tests when a doctor ordered them, or did not promptly report the results back to the doctor who ordered them. · from a complaint F-0773
The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint F-0600
The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint F-0609
View all 46 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 16, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide or obtain laboratory tests when a doctor ordered them, or did not promptly report the results back to the doctor who ordered them. · from a complaint · F-0773 |
| Jul 23, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint · F-0600 |
| Jul 23, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint · F-0609 |
| Jul 23, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · from a complaint · F-0610 |
| Jun 4, 2025 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Jun 4, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures for offering residents flu and pneumonia vaccinations. · F-0883 |
| Jun 4, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| Jun 4, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · F-0677 |
| Jun 4, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · F-0684 |
| Jun 4, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility used feeding tubes without a valid medical reason or the resident's agreement, or did not provide proper care to residents who have feeding tubes. · F-0693 |
| Jun 4, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe, appropriate care for residents who need dialysis — the treatment that filters the blood when kidneys fail. · F-0698 |
| Jun 4, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · from a complaint · F-0761 |
| Jun 4, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide or arrange dental services for its residents. Nursing homes are responsible for making sure residents can get dental care. · F-0791 |
| Jun 4, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · F-0842 |
| Feb 11, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint · F-0600 |
| Jul 16, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint · F-0689 |
| Jul 2, 2024 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Jul 2, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care. · F-0578 |
| Jul 2, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not coordinate resident assessments with the state's pre-admission screening program for mental illness and intellectual disabilities, or failed to refer residents for the special services they need. · F-0644 |
| Jul 2, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · F-0684 |
| Jul 2, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · F-0686 |
| Jul 2, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration. · F-0692 |
| Jul 2, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time. · F-0759 |
| Jul 2, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures for offering residents flu and pneumonia vaccinations. · F-0883 |
| Jul 2, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not educate residents and staff about COVID-19 vaccination, offer the vaccine to those eligible after that education, or properly document everyone's vaccination status. · F-0887 |
| Jul 2, 2024 | B · Potential for minimal harm, pattern | The facility housed residents in rooms below ground level, which is not allowed. · F-0916 |
| May 8, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint · F-0689 |
| Apr 11, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · from a complaint · F-0677 |
| Mar 20, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint · F-0656 |
| Mar 20, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint · F-0684 |
| Nov 30, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · from a complaint · F-0658 |
| Nov 30, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. · from a complaint · F-0690 |
| Oct 25, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint · F-0656 |
| Oct 25, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · from a complaint · F-0686 |
| Aug 9, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents from misuse of their belongings or money — this is called misappropriation, and it includes theft or improper use of a resident's property or funds. · from a complaint · F-0602 |
| Aug 9, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · from a complaint · F-0610 |
| Jul 12, 2023 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Jul 12, 2023 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not designate a qualified infection preventionist — a trained person responsible for running the infection prevention and control program. · F-0882 |
| Jul 12, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Jul 12, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility had resident rooms smaller than required — at least 80 square feet per person in shared rooms and 100 square feet in single rooms. · F-0912 |
| Jul 12, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not post the names, addresses, and phone numbers of state agencies and advocacy groups, along with a notice that residents may file complaints with the state survey agency. · F-0575 |
| Jul 12, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · F-0677 |
| Jul 12, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have a working program to monitor how antibiotics are used. Tracking antibiotic use helps make sure these drugs are given only when needed and remain effective. · F-0881 |
| Jul 12, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep its building and grounds safe, functional, clean, and comfortable for residents, staff, and visitors. · F-0921 |
| Jul 12, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not maintain an effective pest control program to prevent or deal with mice, insects, or other pests. · F-0925 |
| Jul 12, 2023 | B · Potential for minimal harm, pattern | The facility housed residents in rooms below ground level, which is not allowed. · F-0916 |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (10 → 10).
All citationsSerious citations (G–L)
2023
All citations: 16
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2024
All citations: 15
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2025
All citations: 14
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2026
All citations: 1
Serious citations (G–L): 0
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 16 | 0 | F |
| 2024 | 15 | 0 | F |
| 2025 | 14 | 0 | F |
| 2026 | 1 | 0 | D |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
What these staffing numbers mean →
This facilityMichigan averageU.S. average
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)
This facility: 3.56
Michigan average: 4.32
U.S. average: 3.95
Registered Nurse hours
This facility: 0.33
Michigan average: 0.84
U.S. average: 0.69
Weekend total nurse staffing
This facility: 3.08
Michigan average: 3.79
U.S. average: 3.50
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Michigan avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.56 | 4.32 | 3.95 | bottom 12% in Michigan; bottom 40% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.33 | 0.84 | 0.69 | bottom 7% in Michigan; bottom 13% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 3.08 | 3.79 | 3.50 | bottom 10% in Michigan; bottom 35% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.13 | 0.49 | 0.48 | bottom 3% in Michigan; bottom 3% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 45.4 | 44.1 | 45.8 | bottom 47% in Michigan; bottom 49% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 62.5 | 39.2 | 42.9 | bottom 12% in Michigan; bottom 19% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.86, RN 0.36, weekend 3.34.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.86 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 2/5.
Quality measures: assessments & claims
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5
Costs & payment
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Optalis Health and Rehabilitation of Allen Park. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Calculate a stay from a quote you receive
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Before you compare prices
- Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
- Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
- Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
Who owns this facility
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Om Holdco 5 LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 100% | 04/07/2023 |
| Optalis LP Investors 5 LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 10% | 04/07/2023 |
| Optum Management Solutions. INC | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/07/2023 |
| SNW LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 30% | 04/07/2023 |
| Atto, Ghassan | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/01/2025 |
| Charles Franklin LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/30/2025 |
| Cliftonlarsonallen LLP | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2025 |
| Denhart, Corinna | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/01/2025 |
| Forbright Bank | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/26/2026 |
| Hemant Shah 2018 Irrevocable Trust | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/30/2025 |
| Obs of Mi LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/01/2025 |
| Om Holdco 5 LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/11/2026 |
| Optalis LP Investors 5 LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/30/2025 |
| Paar 108 LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/30/2025 |
| Piccininni, Judy | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/01/2025 |
| Piccininni, Judy | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/11/2026 |
| Pinal R. Patel 2017 Irrevocable Trust F/B/O Aarna R. Patel | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/30/2025 |
| Pinal R. Patel 2017 Irrevocable Trust F/B/O Ansh R. Patel | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/30/2025 |
| Pinal R. Patel 2020 Irrevocable Family Trust Uad 10-6-2020 | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/30/2025 |
| Rajan G Patel 2020 Irr Fam Tr Uad 12-3-2020 | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/30/2025 |
Showing 20 of 22 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 2 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.
Other facilities in the same chain
CMS lists this facility under the chain Optalis Health & Rehabilitation — 36 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
- Optalis Health and Rehabilitation of Ann Arbor — Ann Arbor, MI · overall 3/5abuse
- Optalis Health and Rehabilitation of Canton — Canton, MI · overall 2/5abuse
- Optalis Health and Rehabilitation of Dearborn Heig — Dearborn Heights, MI · overall 2/5
- Optalis Health and Rehabilitation of Grand Rapids — Grand Rapids, MI · overall 1/5abuseSFF
- Optalis Health and Rehabilitation of Grosse Pointe — Grosse Pointe Woods, MI · overall 5/5
- Optalis Health and Rehabilitation of Kingsford — Kingsford, MI · overall 1/5
- Optalis Health and Rehabilitation of Sterling Heig — Sterling Heights, MI · overall 3/5
- Optalis Health and Rehabilitation of Three Rivers — Three Rivers, MI · overall 1/5abuse
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 35 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "When a doctor orders lab work, how quickly is it done and how are results communicated back?"
- "Tell me about this abuse or neglect citation — what happened, and what specific changes did you make afterward?"
- "When abuse or theft is suspected, who do you notify, how fast, and how do you inform the family?"
- "If someone reports suspected abuse or neglect here, what happens in the first 24 hours?"
- "Who leads your infection prevention program, and how do you make sure staff follow practices like hand hygiene every day?"
- "What percentage of your residents and staff are vaccinated against flu and pneumonia, and how do you offer the vaccines?"
- "Can you show me an example care plan, and how are families included when it's created and updated?"
- "How many aides are on each shift, and how do you make sure every resident gets timely help with bathing, dressing, and meals?"
Also worth asking anywhere
- "Your weekend nurse staffing is reported below the Michigan midpoint — how does the weekend schedule differ from a weekday?"
- "Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
- "CMS reports 45% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
- "The ownership record on file lists 22 owning or managing parties — who makes the decisions about staffing levels?"
- "Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"
Nearby facilities (12 closest of 75 within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Lodge at Taylor | 2.8 mi | Taylor, MI | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Medilodge of Taylor | 3.0 mi | Taylor, MI | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Regency, a Villa Center | 3.1 mi | Taylor, MI | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| The Orchards at Southgate | 3.5 mi | Southgate, MI | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Rivergate Terrace | 4.2 mi | Riverview, MI | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Rivergate Health Care Center | 4.3 mi | Riverview, MI | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Riverside Commons Rehab and Nursing Center, LLC | 4.3 mi | Dearborn, MI | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Imperial, a Villa Center | 4.4 mi | Dearborn Heights, MI | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Belle Fountain Nursing & Rehabilitation Center | 4.8 mi | Riverview, MI | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | abuse |
| Allegria Village | 6.2 mi | Dearborn, MI | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Aerius Health Center | 6.2 mi | Riverview, MI | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Optalis Health and Rehabilitation of Dearborn Heig | 6.8 mi | Dearborn Heights, MI | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
Other facilities in the same county
CMS records place this facility in Wayne, MI — 63 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
- Optalis Health and Rehabilitation of Canton — Canton, MI · overall 2/5abuse
- Optalis Health and Rehabilitation of Grosse Pointe — Grosse Pointe Woods, MI · overall 5/5
- Pine Creek Manor Skilled Nursing & Rehab Center — Wayne, MI · overall 3/5
- Qualicare Nursing Home — Detroit, MI · overall 5/5
- Regency at Canton — Canton, MI · overall 3/5
- Regency at Chene — Detroit, MI · overall 2/5
- Regency at Livonia — Livonia, MI · overall 3/5
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 235439.