How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
Mission Point Nursing & Physical Rehab Center of D
2102 Orleans St., Detroit, MI 48207 (opens Google Maps) · Wayne County · (313) 462-4362· 59 certified beds · avg 55 residents/day · certified since Aug 21, 2000 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: MISSION POINT HEALTHCARE SERVICES (14 facilities, chain avg rating 2.8★)
4/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
inspected Jan 23, 2026
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
4.17
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)
Every record stays on this page.
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Inspection findings in the public record
Showing the latest 3 of 21 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. F-0812
The facility did not properly complete the required screening (called PASARR) that identifies whether a person entering a nursing home has a mental illness or intellectual disability and needs specialized services. F-0645
The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. F-0686
View all 21 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 23, 2026 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Jan 23, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not properly complete the required screening (called PASARR) that identifies whether a person entering a nursing home has a mental illness or intellectual disability and needs specialized services. · F-0645 |
| Jan 23, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · F-0686 |
| Jan 23, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility used feeding tubes without a valid medical reason or the resident's agreement, or did not provide proper care to residents who have feeding tubes. · F-0693 |
| Jan 23, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · F-0695 |
| Aug 20, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents from misuse of their belongings or money — this is called misappropriation, and it includes theft or improper use of a resident's property or funds. · from a complaint · F-0602 |
| Dec 12, 2024 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Dec 12, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · F-0657 |
| Dec 12, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care. · F-0578 |
| Dec 12, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · F-0677 |
| Dec 12, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline. · F-0688 |
| Dec 12, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Jul 16, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · from a complaint · F-0610 |
| Jun 18, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · from a complaint · F-0755 |
| May 17, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · from a complaint · F-0677 |
| May 17, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint · F-0880 |
| May 1, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint · F-0689 |
| Mar 6, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · from a complaint · F-0686 |
| Mar 6, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · from a complaint · F-0842 |
| Oct 25, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have a working call system — the button or cord residents use to summon help — in each resident's bathroom and bathing area. · F-0919 |
| Oct 25, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration. · from a complaint · F-0692 |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (6 → 5).
All citationsSerious citations (G–L)
2023
All citations: 2
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2024
All citations: 13
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2025
All citations: 1
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2026
All citations: 5
Serious citations (G–L): 0
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 2 | 0 | E |
| 2024 | 13 | 0 | F |
| 2025 | 1 | 0 | D |
| 2026 | 5 | 0 | E |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
What these staffing numbers mean →
This facilityMichigan averageU.S. average
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)
This facility: 4.17
Michigan average: 4.32
U.S. average: 3.95
Registered Nurse hours
This facility: 0.21
Michigan average: 0.84
U.S. average: 0.69
Weekend total nurse staffing
This facility: 3.79
Michigan average: 3.79
U.S. average: 3.50
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Michigan avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 4.17 | 4.32 | 3.95 | top 45% in Michigan; top 33% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.21 | 0.84 | 0.69 | bottom 1% in Michigan; bottom 3% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 3.79 | 3.79 | 3.50 | top 38% in Michigan; top 30% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.18 | 0.49 | 0.48 | bottom 7% in Michigan; bottom 8% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 44.8 | 44.1 | 45.8 | bottom 49% in Michigan; top 50% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | — | 39.2 | 42.9 | — |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.66, RN 0.18, weekend 3.33.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.66 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 3/5.
Quality measures: assessments & claims
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 4/5
Costs & payment
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Mission Point Nursing & Physical Rehab Center of D. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Calculate a stay from a quote you receive
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Before you compare prices
- Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
- Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
- Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
Who owns this facility
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Individual
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MPMS Detroit Acquisition, LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | — | 10/12/2018 |
| PHB Detroit, LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | — | 10/12/2018 |
| Senior Living Fund IV USA, LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | — | 10/12/2018 |
| The Slavik Company | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | — | 10/12/2018 |
| Vranka, Nicholas | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | — | 09/01/2018 |
| WSL Detroit, LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | — | 10/12/2018 |
| Enterprise Realty, LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Mortgage Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/12/2018 |
| Headwater Holdings II LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Mortgage Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/12/2018 |
| Mali, Hari | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/01/2018 |
| Mission Point Management Services LLC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/12/2018 |
| PHB Detroit, LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Mortgage Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/12/2018 |
| Skatzka, Pamela | Individual | W-2 Managing Employee | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/12/2018 |
All 12 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.
Other facilities in the same chain
CMS lists this facility under the chain Mission Point Healthcare Services — 14 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
- Mission Point Nursing & Physical Rehab Center of L — Lamont, MI · overall 4/5
- Mission Point Nursing & Physical Rehabilitation Ce — Grandville, MI · overall 1/5
- Mission Point Nursing & Physical Rehabilitation Ce — Greenville, MI · overall 2/5
- Mission Point Nursing & Physical Rehabilitation Ce — Cedar Springs, MI · overall 4/5
- Mission Point Nursing & Physical Rehabilitation Ce — Belding, MI · overall 4/5abuse
- Mission Point Nursing & Physical Rehabilitation Ce — Grand Rapids, MI · overall 2/5
- Mission Point Nursing & Physical Rehabilitation Ce — Detroit, MI · overall 1/5
- Mission Point Nursing & Physical Rehabilitation Ce — Detroit, MI · overall 3/5
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 13 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "What did your most recent kitchen inspection find, and can I see how food is stored and prepared?"
- "How do you screen new residents for mental health and disability-related needs, and how do you provide the specialized services they require?"
- "How do you prevent bedsores for residents who can't move themselves, and how often are at-risk residents repositioned?"
- "How do you decide when a feeding tube is truly needed, and how do staff care for residents who have one?"
- "How many residents here use oxygen or breathing equipment, and who checks that equipment each shift?"
- "What safeguards do you have to protect residents' money and belongings, and what happens when something goes missing?"
- "Who is on the team that builds each resident's care plan, and how quickly is it in place after admission?"
- "How do you record and honor each resident's treatment wishes and advance directives, and how do staff know about them?"
Also worth asking anywhere
- "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
- "Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
- "CMS reports 45% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
- "Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"
Nearby facilities (12 closest of 90 within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Regency at Chene | 0.4 mi | Detroit, MI | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Hamilton Nursing Home | 1.6 mi | Detroit, MI | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Qualicare Nursing Home | 1.7 mi | Detroit, MI | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Riverview Health & Rehab Center | 2.0 mi | Detroit, MI | ★★★☆☆ | 4/5 | |
| Mission Point Nursing & Physical Rehabilitation Ce | 2.1 mi | Detroit, MI | ★☆☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Ambassador, a Villa Center | 2.2 mi | Detroit, MI | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Boulevard Temple Care Center, LLC | 3.2 mi | Detroit, MI | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Mission Point Nursing & Physical Rehabilitation Ce | 3.6 mi | Detroit, MI | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| St. Joseph's, a Villa Center | 3.7 mi | Hamtramck, MI | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| The Orchards at Samaritan | 4.0 mi | Detroit, MI | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | abuse |
| Omni Continuing Care | 4.3 mi | Detroit, MI | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Heritage Manor Nursing and Rehabilitation Center | 5.3 mi | Detroit, MI | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
Other facilities in the same county
CMS records place this facility in Wayne, MI — 63 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
- Northville Manor — Northville, MI · overall 2/5
- Oakpointe Senior Care and Rehab Center — Detroit, MI · overall 5/5
- Optalis Health and Rehabilitation of Allen Park — Allen Park, MI · overall 3/5
- Optalis Health and Rehabilitation of Canton — Canton, MI · overall 2/5abuse
- Optalis Health and Rehabilitation of Dearborn Heig — Dearborn Heights, MI · overall 2/5
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 235595.