MichiganFort Gratiot

Medilodge of Port Huron

5635 Lakeshore, Fort Gratiot, MI 48059 · St. Clair County · 127 certified beds · avg 119 residents/day · certified since Feb 12, 1982

Part of chain: MEDILODGE (53 facilities, chain avg rating 3.1★)

5/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
4.41
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★★★5/5 · CMS overall rating: 5/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (14)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
May 21, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline.
May 2, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · from a complaint
May 2, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · from a complaint
May 2, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint
May 2, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
May 2, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility used bed rails without first trying safer alternatives, or without assessing the resident's safety risk, discussing the risks and benefits with the resident or family, getting consent, and installing the rails correctly. · from a complaint
May 2, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint
Feb 15, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups.
Feb 15, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care.
Feb 15, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.
Feb 15, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not properly complete the required screening (called PASARR) that identifies whether a person entering a nursing home has a mental illness or intellectual disability and needs specialized services.
Feb 15, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
Feb 15, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.
Feb 15, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not educate residents and staff about COVID-19 vaccination, offer the vaccine to those eligible after that education, or properly document everyone's vaccination status.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (6 → 1).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202370D
202460E
202510D

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityMichigan avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)4.414.323.95top 34% in Michigan; top 26% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.990.840.69top 27% in Michigan; top 16% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.513.793.50bottom 44% in Michigan; top 41% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.220.490.48bottom 13% in Michigan; bottom 15% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)22.944.145.8top 4% in Michigan; top 5% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)21.739.242.9top 17% in Michigan; top 17% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.04, RN 0.90, weekend 3.22. Staffing rating: 5/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Individual

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
B&y Healthcare S CorpOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest06/24/2013
B&y TrustOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest06/24/2013
Cody Healthcare S CorpOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest06/24/2013
Craig Flashner 2007 TrustOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest06/24/2013
Fifteeninone Opco Group LLCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%06/24/2013
Flashner, CraigIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2013
Flashner, CraigIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE06/24/2013
Generations Healthcare Management LLCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE06/24/2013
Kirk, KristineIndividualW-2 Managing EmployeeNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2020
Norcross, RobertIndividualContracted Managing EmployeeNOT APPLICABLE06/24/2013
Perlstein, YitzchokIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2013
Perlstein, YitzchokIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE06/24/2013
Prestige Administrative Services, LLCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE06/13/2013
Rogers, StaceyIndividualContracted Managing EmployeeNOT APPLICABLE10/20/2014

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Regency on the Lake - Fort Gratiot0.1 miFort Gratiot, MI★★★★★5/5
Marwood Manor Nursing Home8.1 miPort Huron, MI★★★★★4/5
Medilodge of Yale16.8 miYale, MI★★★★★5/5
Medilodge of St. Clair19.9 miEast China, MI★★☆☆☆2/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Fort Gratiot →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 235421.