How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
249 West McMurray Road, McMurray, PA 15317 (opens Google Maps) · Washington County · (724) 941-7150· 115 certified beds · avg 102 residents/day · certified since Jan 1, 1967 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: AMERICAN HEALTH FOUNDATION (5 facilities, chain avg rating 2.8★)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Showing the latest 3 of 17 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not protect residents from misuse of their belongings or money — this is called misappropriation, and it includes theft or improper use of a resident's property or funds. · from a complaint F-0602
The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · from a complaint F-0755
The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · from a complaint F-0686
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 30, 2026 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not protect residents from misuse of their belongings or money — this is called misappropriation, and it includes theft or improper use of a resident's property or funds. · from a complaint · F-0602 |
| Mar 30, 2026 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · from a complaint · F-0755 |
| Dec 3, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · from a complaint · F-0686 |
| Dec 6, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| Dec 6, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · F-0684 |
| Oct 9, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not give residents (and their representatives and the ombudsman, a state advocate for residents) proper advance notice before a transfer or discharge, including information about their right to appeal. · from a complaint · F-0623 |
| Jul 30, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · from a complaint · F-0842 |
| Nov 9, 2023 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Nov 9, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · F-0609 |
| Nov 9, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility's activities program was not run by a qualified professional. The person directing recreation and social activities must have proper training or credentials. · F-0680 |
| Nov 9, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not give residents proper notice about what Medicare or Medicaid covers, or about charges the resident might owe for services that aren't covered. · F-0582 |
| Nov 9, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · F-0657 |
| Nov 9, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689 |
| Dec 29, 2022 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not regularly inspect bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails for safety, or the rails and mattresses were not attached safely to the frames. · F-0909 |
| Dec 29, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility used physical restraints — devices that limit a resident's movement — when they weren't needed for medical treatment. · F-0604 |
| Dec 29, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| Dec 29, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (6 → 2).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 4 | 0 | F |
| 2023 | 6 | 0 | F |
| 2024 | 4 | 0 | D |
| 2025 | 1 | 0 | D |
| 2026 | 2 | 0 | E |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Pennsylvania avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.29 | 3.94 | 3.95 | bottom 28% in Pennsylvania; bottom 26% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.77 | 0.80 | 0.69 | top 36% in Pennsylvania; top 29% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 2.80 | 3.58 | 3.50 | bottom 16% in Pennsylvania; bottom 21% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.44 | 0.56 | 0.48 | top 49% in Pennsylvania; top 41% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 67.3 | 44.5 | 45.8 | bottom 5% in Pennsylvania; bottom 8% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 50.0 | 39.9 | 42.9 | bottom 31% in Pennsylvania; bottom 39% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.29, RN 0.78, weekend 2.80.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.29 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 2/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 2/5 · long-stay residents: 1/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for McMurray Hills Rehabilitation and Healthcare Cente. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
Non profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ahf Home Office INC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/1995 |
| Ahf Management Corp | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/1995 |
| Ahf Management Corp | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/18/2025 |
| American Health Foundation , INC. | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/1995 |
| American Health Foundation , INC. | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/18/2025 |
| Haemmerle, J Michael | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/20/1996 |
| Haemmerle, J Michael | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/1995 |
| Haemmerle, J Michael | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/1995 |
| Haemmerle, Jeffrey | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/20/2023 |
| Haemmerle, Jeffrey | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/20/2023 |
| Haemmerle, Jeffrey | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/20/2023 |
| Haemmerle, John | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/27/2008 |
| Haemmerle, Mark | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/03/1989 |
| Haemmerle, Mark | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/1995 |
| Lehman, Suzanne | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/1995 |
| Lehman, Suzanne | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/27/1994 |
| Lehman, Suzanne | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/27/1994 |
| Lehman, Timothy | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/29/1994 |
| Lehman, Timothy | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/1995 |
| McDonough, James | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2017 |
Showing 20 of 25 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 5 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.
CMS lists this facility under the chain American Health Foundation — 5 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Peters Township Post Acute | 0.3 mi | McMurray, PA | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Kadima Rehabilitation & Nursing at North Strabane | 1.3 mi | Canonsburg, PA | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Wecare at South Hills Rehabilitation and Nrsg Ctr | 1.5 mi | Canonsburg, PA | —/5 | abuseSFF | |
| Friendship Village of South Hi | 3.1 mi | Pittsburgh, PA | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Townview Health and Rehabilitation Center | 3.3 mi | Canonsburg, PA | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Bridgeville Rehabilitation & Care Center | 3.5 mi | Bridgeville, PA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
| Greenery Center for Rehab and Nursing | 3.9 mi | Canonsburg, PA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | SFF |
| Meadowcrest Rehabilitation & Healthcare Center | 4.9 mi | Bethel Park, PA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| South Hills Post Acute | 6.9 mi | Bethel Park, PA | ★★★☆☆ | 4/5 | |
| Wecare at Mt Lebanon Rehabilitation and Nrsg Ctr | 7.0 mi | Pittsburgh, PA | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| John J Kane Regional Center-Sc | 7.3 mi | Pittsburgh, PA | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | abuse |
| Providence Point Healthcare Residence | 7.5 mi | Pittsburgh, PA | ★★★★★ | 4/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
CMS records place this facility in Washington, PA — 12 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 395032.
This page is the printable visit checklist. If your browser did not open the print dialog automatically, use File → Print (Ctrl/⌘-P).
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details