OhioDayton

Sanctuary at Wilmington Place

264 Wilmington Avenue, Dayton, OH 45420 · Montgomery County · 63 certified beds · avg 54 residents/day · certified since Apr 25, 1990

Part of chain: AMERICAN HEALTH FOUNDATION (5 facilities, chain avg rating 2.8★)

2/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
2
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
3.74
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 2/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Nov 16, 2023 · F-0687 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not provide proper foot care for residents. Foot care includes routine care like nail trimming and attention to foot problems, which matter greatly for older adults.

Why it matters: Neglected feet can develop painful sores and infections, especially dangerous for residents with diabetes.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Dec 11, 2023 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Nov 26, 2019 · F-0697

The facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it.

Why it matters: Untreated pain causes needless suffering and can lead to depression, poor sleep, and declining health.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Dec 21, 2019 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (41)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Jan 27, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · from a complaint
Jun 2, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away. · from a complaint
Jun 2, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not coordinate resident assessments with the state's pre-admission screening program for mental illness and intellectual disabilities, or failed to refer residents for the special services they need.
Jun 2, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Jun 2, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Jun 2, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist.
Jun 2, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems.
Jun 2, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication.
Jun 2, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Jun 2, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Dec 30, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · from a complaint
Dec 30, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication. · from a complaint
Nov 26, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups. · from a complaint
Nov 26, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away. · from a complaint
Nov 26, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. · from a complaint
Nov 26, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not educate residents and staff about COVID-19 vaccination, offer the vaccine to those eligible after that education, or properly document everyone's vaccination status. · from a complaint
Apr 25, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint
Nov 16, 2023▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not provide proper foot care for residents. Foot care includes routine care like nail trimming and attention to foot problems, which matter greatly for older adults. · from a complaint
Nov 16, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint
Nov 16, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · from a complaint
Dec 27, 2022F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not have a registered nurse on duty at least 8 hours a day, or did not have a registered nurse serving full-time as director of nursing.
Dec 27, 2022F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not observe each nurse aide's job performance or provide regular training as required.
Dec 27, 2022F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Dec 27, 2022F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility was not managed in a way that uses its money, staff, and resources effectively and efficiently to care for residents.
Dec 27, 2022E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
Dec 27, 2022E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility's menus did not meet residents' nutritional needs, or were not prepared in advance, followed as written, kept up to date, or reviewed by a dietician.
Dec 27, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care.
Dec 27, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not give residents proper notice about what Medicare or Medicaid covers, or about charges the resident might owe for services that aren't covered.
Dec 27, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not give the resident or their representative written notice of how long it would hold the resident's bed during a hospital stay or approved leave.
Dec 27, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist.
Dec 27, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems.
Dec 27, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide routine dental care and 24-hour emergency dental care for residents.
Dec 27, 2022C · Minimal risk, facility-wideThe facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft. These written safeguards are the foundation of resident protection.
Dec 27, 2022C · Minimal risk, facility-wideThe facility did not post its nurse staffing information every day. Nursing homes must publicly display how many nurses and aides are on duty each day.
Nov 26, 2019▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it.
Nov 26, 2019F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Nov 26, 2019F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Nov 26, 2019E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Nov 26, 2019D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care.
Nov 26, 2019D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
Nov 26, 2019C · Minimal risk, facility-wideThe facility did not observe each nurse aide's job performance or provide regular training as required.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (14 → 9).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
201971G ▲
2022140F
202331G ▲
202470D
202590D
202610D

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityOhio avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.743.453.95top 24% in Ohio; bottom 48% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.800.600.69top 15% in Ohio; top 28% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.303.073.50top 25% in Ohio; bottom 48% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.370.420.48bottom 47% in Ohio; bottom 47% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)67.548.745.8bottom 9% in Ohio; bottom 8% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)42.943.942.9top 47% in Ohio; bottom 49% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.72, RN 0.79, weekend 3.29. Staffing rating: 3/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5

Who owns this facility

Non profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Haemmerle, J MichaelIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2016
Ahf Management CorpOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2016
Ahf Management CorpOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE02/13/2025
American Health Foundation , INC.OrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2016
Haemmerle, J MichaelIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2016
Haemmerle, J MichaelIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE11/20/1996
Haemmerle, J MichaelIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE11/20/1996
Haemmerle, J MichaelIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2016
Haemmerle, JeffreyIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2016
Haemmerle, JeffreyIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE12/20/2023
Haemmerle, JeffreyIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE12/20/2023
Haemmerle, JeffreyIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE12/20/2023
Haemmerle, JohnIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE11/20/1996
Haemmerle, JohnIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE11/20/1996
Haemmerle, MarkIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE12/29/1995
Haemmerle, MarkIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE12/29/1995
Hunter, RachelIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE06/11/2023
Hunter, RachelIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2024
Lehman, SuzanneIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2016
Lehman, SuzanneIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2016

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Widows Home of Dayton2.0 miDayton, OH★★☆☆☆1/5
Dunbar Health & Rehab Center2.3 miDayton, OH★★★☆☆2/5
The Laurels of Kettering2.5 miKettering, OH★★☆☆☆1/5
Oaks of West Kettering the2.6 miKettering, OH★★☆☆☆1/5
Kettering Heights Post Acute2.8 miKettering, OH★★☆☆☆2/5
Beavercreek Health and Rehab3.0 miBeavercreek, OH★☆☆☆☆1/5
Gem City Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center3.2 miDayton, OH★★★☆☆2/5
Grafton Oaks Nursing Center3.4 miDayton, OH★★☆☆☆2/5abuse
Village at the Greene4.2 miDayton, OH★☆☆☆☆1/5
Walnut Creek Nursing Center4.8 miKettering, OH★☆☆☆☆2/5
Carecore at Mary Scott5.0 miDayton, OH★★★☆☆2/5
Oak Creek Terrace INC5.1 miKettering, OH★★★☆☆3/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Dayton →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 365789.