OhioFairfield

Majestic Care of Fairfield LLC

5200 Camelot Drive, Fairfield, OH 45014 · Butler County · 200 certified beds · avg 142 residents/day · certified since Nov 20, 1978

Part of chain: MAJESTIC CARE (22 facilities, chain avg rating 2.5★)

2/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
3.03
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 2/5

⚠ The most recent standard health inspection was more than 2 years ago — conditions may have changed.

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (35)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Jun 25, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · from a complaint
Jun 10, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Mar 18, 2025F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility has more than 120 beds but did not hire a qualified full-time social worker as required. · from a complaint
Sep 9, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility was not managed in a way that uses its money, staff, and resources effectively and efficiently to care for residents. · from a complaint
Sep 9, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint
Sep 9, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not keep its building and grounds safe, functional, clean, and comfortable for residents, staff, and visitors. · from a complaint
Jun 24, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not properly notify residents about the balance of money it holds for them, or failed to return those funds when a resident was discharged, evicted, or died. · from a complaint
Jun 24, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from misuse of their belongings or money — this is called misappropriation, and it includes theft or improper use of a resident's property or funds. · from a complaint
Jun 24, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · from a complaint
Mar 13, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Feb 1, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not have a proper governing body legally responsible for its policies and operations, or that body failed to appoint a properly licensed administrator to manage the facility. · from a complaint
Feb 1, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature. · from a complaint
Dec 21, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not safely and appropriately administer IV fluids (fluids given through a vein) for residents who needed them. · from a complaint
Dec 21, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · from a complaint
Dec 21, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have a proper governing body legally responsible for its policies and operations, or that body failed to appoint a properly licensed administrator to manage the facility. · from a complaint
Oct 31, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide appropriate treatment and services to residents with a mental health condition, difficulty adjusting emotionally, or a history of trauma or post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). · from a complaint
Oct 31, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication. · from a complaint
Oct 31, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint
Sep 21, 2023F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Sep 21, 2023F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint
Sep 21, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
Sep 21, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Sep 21, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
Sep 21, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · from a complaint
Sep 21, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · from a complaint
Sep 21, 2023B · Minimal risk, repeatedThe facility did not give residents (and their representatives and the ombudsman, a state advocate for residents) proper advance notice before a transfer or discharge, including information about their right to appeal.
Jan 30, 2020E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility's menus did not meet residents' nutritional needs, or were not prepared in advance, followed as written, kept up to date, or reviewed by a dietician.
Jan 30, 2020D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not fully assess residents on time — a complete assessment of health, abilities, and needs is required when a resident is first admitted and at least once every 12 months after that.
Jan 30, 2020D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not reassess a resident after a significant change in their condition, such as a sudden decline in health. A full new assessment is required when a resident's condition changes in a major way.
Jan 30, 2020D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
Jan 30, 2020D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
Jan 30, 2020D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents' medications free from unnecessary drugs. Residents should only take medicines they truly need, at the right dose, for a clear reason.
Jan 30, 2020D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Nov 29, 2018D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
Nov 29, 2018D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide activities that meet residents' needs and interests. Nursing homes must offer meaningful activity programs, not just leave residents idle.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (7 → 8).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
201820D
202070E
2023140F
202490F
202510F
202620D

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityOhio avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.033.453.95bottom 27% in Ohio; bottom 15% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.480.600.69bottom 37% in Ohio; bottom 35% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing2.813.073.50bottom 38% in Ohio; bottom 21% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.440.420.48top 36% in Ohio; top 41% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)43.648.745.8top 36% in Ohio; top 46% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)30.843.942.9top 29% in Ohio; top 30% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.50, RN 0.56, weekend 3.25. Staffing rating: 2/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 1/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Individual

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
RB SNF Operations Holdings LLCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%10/01/2020
5200 Camelot Drive SNF Realty LLCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2020
5200 Camelot Drive SNF Realty LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2020
Ali, AsadIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2025
Ali, AsadIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2025
Chamberlain, MargaretIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE09/11/2023
Chamberlain, MargaretIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE09/11/2023
Gibboney, BrianIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2025
Gibboney, BrianIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2025
Majestic Management LLCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2020
Majestic Management LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/11/2025
Marx, DavidIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2020
Marx, DavidIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2020
Pruitt, PaulIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2023
Pruitt, PaulIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2023
Pruitt, PaulIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2023
RB SNF Real Estate Holdings LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2020
Rewa, AngelaIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE10/23/2023
Rewa, AngelaIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE10/23/2023
Russell, RobertIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE04/08/2024

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Parkside Nursing and Rehabilitation Center1.5 miFairfield, OH★★★☆☆2/5
Ayden Healthcare of Fairfield2.6 miFairfield, OH★☆☆☆☆1/5
Carecore at the Meadows2.9 miCincinnati, OH★★☆☆☆2/5
Veranda Gardens Nursing & Rehabilitation Center3.1 miCincinnati, OH★★☆☆☆2/5
Hamilton Respiratory and Nursing Center3.1 miHamilton, OH★★★☆☆3/5
Glen Meadows3.4 miHamilton, OH★★★★★5/5
Sanctuary Pointe Nursing & Rehabilitation Center3.5 miCincinnati, OH★★★★★5/5
Birchwood Care Center3.8 miHamilton, OH★★★★★5/5
Residence at Huntington Court3.8 miHamilton, OH★★★★★4/5
Doverwood Village3.9 miHamilton, OH★★★★★4/5
Triple Creek Retirement Community4.2 miCincinnati, OH★★★★★4/5
Alois Alzheimer's Care Center4.6 miCincinnati, OH★★★★☆4/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Fairfield →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 365396.