How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
Majestic Care of Fairfield LLC
5200 Camelot Drive, Fairfield, OH 45014 (opens Google Maps) · Butler County · (513) 829-8100· 200 certified beds · avg 142 residents/day · certified since Nov 20, 1978 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: MAJESTIC CARE (22 facilities, chain avg rating 2.5★)
2/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
inspected Sep 21, 2023
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
3.03
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)
Every record stays on this page.
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 2/5 · how star ratings work →
⚠ The most recent standard health inspection was more than 2 years ago — conditions may have changed.
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Inspection findings in the public record
Showing the latest 3 of 35 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · from a complaint F-0550
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint F-0689
The facility has more than 120 beds but did not hire a qualified full-time social worker as required. · from a complaint F-0850
View all 35 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 25, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · from a complaint · F-0550 |
| Jun 10, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint · F-0689 |
| Mar 18, 2025 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility has more than 120 beds but did not hire a qualified full-time social worker as required. · from a complaint · F-0850 |
| Sep 9, 2024 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility was not managed in a way that uses its money, staff, and resources effectively and efficiently to care for residents. · from a complaint · F-0835 |
| Sep 9, 2024 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint · F-0880 |
| Sep 9, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not keep its building and grounds safe, functional, clean, and comfortable for residents, staff, and visitors. · from a complaint · F-0921 |
| Jun 24, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not properly notify residents about the balance of money it holds for them, or failed to return those funds when a resident was discharged, evicted, or died. · from a complaint · F-0569 |
| Jun 24, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents from misuse of their belongings or money — this is called misappropriation, and it includes theft or improper use of a resident's property or funds. · from a complaint · F-0602 |
| Jun 24, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · from a complaint · F-0610 |
| Mar 13, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint · F-0689 |
| Feb 1, 2024 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not have a proper governing body legally responsible for its policies and operations, or that body failed to appoint a properly licensed administrator to manage the facility. · from a complaint · F-0837 |
| Feb 1, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature. · from a complaint · F-0804 |
| Dec 21, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not safely and appropriately administer IV fluids (fluids given through a vein) for residents who needed them. · from a complaint · F-0694 |
| Dec 21, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · from a complaint · F-0755 |
| Dec 21, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have a proper governing body legally responsible for its policies and operations, or that body failed to appoint a properly licensed administrator to manage the facility. · from a complaint · F-0837 |
| Oct 31, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide appropriate treatment and services to residents with a mental health condition, difficulty adjusting emotionally, or a history of trauma or post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). · from a complaint · F-0742 |
| Oct 31, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication. · from a complaint · F-0760 |
| Oct 31, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint · F-0880 |
| Sep 21, 2023 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Sep 21, 2023 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint · F-0880 |
| Sep 21, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · F-0657 |
| Sep 21, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689 |
| Sep 21, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · F-0641 |
| Sep 21, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · from a complaint · F-0677 |
| Sep 21, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · from a complaint · F-0755 |
| Sep 21, 2023 | B · Potential for minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not give residents (and their representatives and the ombudsman, a state advocate for residents) proper advance notice before a transfer or discharge, including information about their right to appeal. · F-0623 |
| Jan 30, 2020 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility's menus did not meet residents' nutritional needs, or were not prepared in advance, followed as written, kept up to date, or reviewed by a dietician. · F-0803 |
| Jan 30, 2020 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not fully assess residents on time — a complete assessment of health, abilities, and needs is required when a resident is first admitted and at least once every 12 months after that. · F-0636 |
| Jan 30, 2020 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not reassess a resident after a significant change in their condition, such as a sudden decline in health. A full new assessment is required when a resident's condition changes in a major way. · F-0637 |
| Jan 30, 2020 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · F-0641 |
| Jan 30, 2020 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · F-0677 |
| Jan 30, 2020 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep residents' medications free from unnecessary drugs. Residents should only take medicines they truly need, at the right dose, for a clear reason. · F-0757 |
| Jan 30, 2020 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Nov 29, 2018 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · F-0641 |
| Nov 29, 2018 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide activities that meet residents' needs and interests. Nursing homes must offer meaningful activity programs, not just leave residents idle. · F-0679 |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (7 → 8).
All citationsSerious citations (G–L)
2018
All citations: 2
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2020
All citations: 7
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2023
All citations: 14
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2024
All citations: 9
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2025
All citations: 1
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2026
All citations: 2
Serious citations (G–L): 0
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 | 2 | 0 | D |
| 2020 | 7 | 0 | E |
| 2023 | 14 | 0 | F |
| 2024 | 9 | 0 | F |
| 2025 | 1 | 0 | F |
| 2026 | 2 | 0 | D |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
What these staffing numbers mean →
This facilityOhio averageU.S. average
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)
This facility: 3.03
Ohio average: 3.45
U.S. average: 3.95
Registered Nurse hours
This facility: 0.48
Ohio average: 0.60
U.S. average: 0.69
Weekend total nurse staffing
This facility: 2.81
Ohio average: 3.07
U.S. average: 3.50
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Ohio avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.03 | 3.45 | 3.95 | bottom 27% in Ohio; bottom 15% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.48 | 0.60 | 0.69 | bottom 37% in Ohio; bottom 35% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 2.81 | 3.07 | 3.50 | bottom 38% in Ohio; bottom 21% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.44 | 0.42 | 0.48 | top 36% in Ohio; top 41% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 43.6 | 48.7 | 45.8 | top 36% in Ohio; top 46% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 30.8 | 43.9 | 42.9 | top 29% in Ohio; top 30% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.50, RN 0.56, weekend 3.25.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.50 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 2/5.
Quality measures: assessments & claims
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 1/5
Costs & payment
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Majestic Care of Fairfield LLC. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Calculate a stay from a quote you receive
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Before you compare prices
- Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
- Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
- Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
Who owns this facility
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Individual
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RB SNF Operations Holdings LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 100% | 10/01/2020 |
| 5200 Camelot Drive SNF Realty LLC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/01/2020 |
| 5200 Camelot Drive SNF Realty LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/01/2020 |
| Ali, Asad | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2025 |
| Ali, Asad | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2025 |
| Chamberlain, Margaret | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/11/2023 |
| Chamberlain, Margaret | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/11/2023 |
| Gibboney, Brian | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2025 |
| Gibboney, Brian | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2025 |
| Majestic Management LLC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/01/2020 |
| Majestic Management LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/11/2025 |
| Marx, David | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/01/2020 |
| Marx, David | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/01/2020 |
| Pruitt, Paul | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/01/2023 |
| Pruitt, Paul | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/01/2023 |
| Pruitt, Paul | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/01/2023 |
| RB SNF Real Estate Holdings LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/01/2020 |
| Rewa, Angela | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/23/2023 |
| Rewa, Angela | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/23/2023 |
| Russell, Robert | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/08/2024 |
Showing 20 of 25 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 5 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.
Other facilities in the same chain
CMS lists this facility under the chain Majestic Care — 22 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
- Majestic Care of Kent — Kent, OH · overall 2/5
- Majestic Care of Middletown LLC — Middletown, OH · overall 2/5
- Majestic Care of New Lexington — New Lexington, OH · overall 3/5
- Majestic Care of Perrysburg — Perrysburg, OH · overall 2/5
- Majestic Care of Point Place — Toledo, OH · overall 1/5
- Majestic Care of Toledo SNF — Toledo, OH · overall 5/5
- Majestic Care of Whitehall — Whitehall, OH · overall 3/5
- Majestic Care of Avon — Avon, IN · overall 2/5
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 21 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "Can you give me examples of how your staff protect residents' dignity in everyday care, like bathing and dressing?"
- "What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
- "Do you have a full-time social worker on staff, and how would they work with my family member?"
- "What were the findings behind this administration citation, and what has leadership changed since?"
- "Who leads your infection prevention program, and how do you make sure staff follow practices like hand hygiene every day?"
- "Can we tour the whole building today, including resident bathrooms and common areas, not just the lobby?"
- "If you manage my family member's personal funds, how often will we get statements and how quickly are funds returned?"
- "What safeguards do you have to protect residents' money and belongings, and what happens when something goes missing?"
Also worth asking anywhere
- "Your weekend nurse staffing is reported below the Ohio midpoint — how does the weekend schedule differ from a weekday?"
- "Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
- "CMS reports 44% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
- "The ownership record on file lists 25 owning or managing parties — who makes the decisions about staffing levels?"
- "Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"
Nearby facilities (12 closest of 114 within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Parkside Nursing and Rehabilitation Center | 1.5 mi | Fairfield, OH | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Ayden Healthcare of Fairfield | 2.6 mi | Fairfield, OH | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Carecore at the Meadows | 2.9 mi | Cincinnati, OH | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Veranda Gardens Nursing & Rehabilitation Center | 3.1 mi | Cincinnati, OH | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Hamilton Respiratory and Nursing Center | 3.1 mi | Hamilton, OH | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Glen Meadows | 3.4 mi | Hamilton, OH | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Sanctuary Pointe Nursing & Rehabilitation Center | 3.5 mi | Cincinnati, OH | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Birchwood Care Center | 3.8 mi | Hamilton, OH | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Residence at Huntington Court | 3.8 mi | Hamilton, OH | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Doverwood Village | 3.9 mi | Hamilton, OH | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Triple Creek Retirement Community | 4.2 mi | Cincinnati, OH | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Alois Alzheimer's Care Center | 4.6 mi | Cincinnati, OH | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
Other facilities in the same county
CMS records place this facility in Butler, OH — 25 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
- Majestic Care of Middletown LLC — Middletown, OH · overall 2/5
- Ohio Living Mount Pleasant — Monroe, OH · overall 4/5
- The Laurels of Middletown — Middletown, OH · overall 4/5
- Westover Retirement Community — Hamilton, OH · overall 5/5
- Willow Knoll Post-Acute and Senior Living — Middletown, OH · overall 3/5
- Woodland Country Manor INC — Somerville, OH · overall 4/5
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 365396.