How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
Triple Creek Retirement Community
11230 Pippin Road, Cincinnati, OH 45231 (opens Google Maps) · Hamilton County · (513) 851-0601· 56 certified beds · avg 48 residents/day · certified since Sep 15, 2008 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: TRILOGY HEALTH SERVICES (123 facilities, chain avg rating 4.2★)
4/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
inspected Jul 11, 2025
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
3.10
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)
Every record stays on this page.
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 5/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Inspection findings in the public record
Showing the latest 3 of 20 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint F-0684
The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint F-0880
The facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication. F-0760
View all 20 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 18, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint · F-0684 |
| Mar 25, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint · F-0880 |
| Jul 11, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication. · F-0760 |
| Jul 11, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away. · F-0580 |
| Jul 11, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · from a complaint · F-0584 |
| Jul 11, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not fully assess residents on time — a complete assessment of health, abilities, and needs is required when a resident is first admitted and at least once every 12 months after that. · F-0636 |
| Jul 11, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not update each resident's care assessment at least once every 3 months. These regular check-ins keep the resident's care plan matched to their current condition. · F-0638 |
| Jul 11, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility used feeding tubes without a valid medical reason or the resident's agreement, or did not provide proper care to residents who have feeding tubes. · F-0693 |
| Jul 11, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| May 28, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · from a complaint · F-0842 |
| Feb 15, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · from a complaint · F-0686 |
| Aug 18, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not maintain an effective pest control program to prevent or deal with mice, insects, or other pests. · F-0925 |
| Aug 18, 2022 | B · Potential for minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not give residents (and their representatives and the ombudsman, a state advocate for residents) proper advance notice before a transfer or discharge, including information about their right to appeal. · F-0623 |
| Aug 18, 2022 | B · Potential for minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not give the resident or their representative written notice of how long it would hold the resident's bed during a hospital stay or approved leave. · F-0625 |
| Jul 3, 2019 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Jul 3, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · F-0641 |
| Jul 3, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| Jul 3, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have a registered nurse on duty at least 8 hours a day, or did not have a registered nurse serving full-time as director of nursing. · F-0727 |
| Jul 3, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| Jul 3, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide or arrange dental services for its residents. Nursing homes are responsible for making sure residents can get dental care. · F-0791 |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (3 → 7).
All citationsSerious citations (G–L)
2019
All citations: 6
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2022
All citations: 3
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2024
All citations: 2
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2025
All citations: 7
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2026
All citations: 2
Serious citations (G–L): 0
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 6 | 0 | F |
| 2022 | 3 | 0 | D |
| 2024 | 2 | 0 | D |
| 2025 | 7 | 0 | E |
| 2026 | 2 | 0 | D |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
What these staffing numbers mean →
This facilityOhio averageU.S. average
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)
This facility: 3.10
Ohio average: 3.45
U.S. average: 3.95
Registered Nurse hours
This facility: 0.58
Ohio average: 0.60
U.S. average: 0.69
Weekend total nurse staffing
This facility: 2.56
Ohio average: 3.07
U.S. average: 3.50
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Ohio avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.10 | 3.45 | 3.95 | bottom 33% in Ohio; bottom 17% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.58 | 0.60 | 0.69 | top 42% in Ohio; bottom 50% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 2.56 | 3.07 | 3.50 | bottom 16% in Ohio; bottom 11% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.53 | 0.42 | 0.48 | top 22% in Ohio; top 30% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 47.1 | 48.7 | 45.8 | top 46% in Ohio; bottom 44% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 44.4 | 43.9 | 42.9 | bottom 49% in Ohio; bottom 45% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.61, RN 0.68, weekend 2.98.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.61 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 2/5.
Quality measures: assessments & claims
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 4/5
Costs & payment
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Triple Creek Retirement Community. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Calculate a stay from a quote you receive
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Before you compare prices
- Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
- Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
- Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
Who owns this facility
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Continental Merger Sub LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 10/01/2021 |
| Northstar Healthcare Income INC | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 10/01/2021 |
| Northstar Healthcare Income Operating Partnership LP | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 10/01/2021 |
| Trilogy Holdings Nt-Hci, LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 10/01/2021 |
| Barney, Leigh | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2019 |
| Bryant, William | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/05/2016 |
| Bufford, Randall | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2019 |
| Conner, Gregory | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/03/2021 |
| Corbin, Kathy | Individual | W-2 Managing Employee | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/21/2011 |
| Davis, David | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/21/2017 |
| Fightmaster, Lisa | Individual | W-2 Managing Employee | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/01/2015 |
| Marzec, Karen | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/14/2022 |
| Mehaffey, Todd | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/31/2022 |
| Pietrowski, Cristina | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/31/2022 |
| Prosky, Danny | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/01/2015 |
| Streiff, Mathieu | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/01/2015 |
| Trilogy Management Services LLC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/01/2021 |
All 17 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.
Other facilities in the same chain
CMS lists this facility under the chain Trilogy Health Services — 123 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
- Valley View Health Campus — Fremont, OH · overall 4/5
- Vienna Springs Health Campus — Dayton, OH · overall 5/5
- Violet Springs Health Campus — Pickerington, OH · overall 2/5
- Willows at Bellevue — Bellevue, OH · overall 5/5
- Willows at Bowling Green the — Bowling Green, OH · overall 5/5
- Willows at Willard the — Willard, OH · overall 5/5
- Wooded Glen — Springfield, OH · overall 5/5
- Sun Prairie Senior Living — Sun Prairie, WI · overall 3/5
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 122 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "How do you make sure each resident's care follows the doctor's orders, and what changed after this citation?"
- "Who leads your infection prevention program, and how do you make sure staff follow practices like hand hygiene every day?"
- "What systems do you use to prevent medication errors, and what happens when one occurs?"
- "If my family member falls or their condition changes, exactly when and how will I be notified?"
- "Can we tour the resident rooms, bathrooms, and common areas today, including areas not on the usual tour route?"
- "How soon after admission is a full assessment completed, and how are the findings shared with the family?"
- "How do you track that every resident's quarterly assessment happens on time?"
- "How do you decide when a feeding tube is truly needed, and how do staff care for residents who have one?"
Also worth asking anywhere
- "Your weekend nurse staffing is reported below the Ohio midpoint — how does the weekend schedule differ from a weekday?"
- "Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
- "CMS reports 47% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
- "The ownership record on file lists 17 owning or managing parties — who makes the decisions about staffing levels?"
- "Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"
Nearby facilities (12 closest of 115 within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sanctuary Pointe Nursing & Rehabilitation Center | 0.7 mi | Cincinnati, OH | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Veranda Gardens Nursing & Rehabilitation Center | 1.2 mi | Cincinnati, OH | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Burlington House Rehab & Alzheimer's Care Center | 1.8 mi | Cincinnati, OH | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | abuse |
| Home at Taylor's Pointe | 2.4 mi | Cincinnati, OH | ★★★☆☆ | 4/5 | |
| Alois Alzheimer's Care Center | 2.6 mi | Cincinnati, OH | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Carecore at the Meadows | 2.8 mi | Cincinnati, OH | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Mt Healthy Christian Home | 3.2 mi | Cincinnati, OH | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Home at Hearthstone, the | 3.2 mi | Cincinnati, OH | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Majestic Care of Fairfield LLC | 4.2 mi | Fairfield, OH | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Ayden Healthcare of Fairfield | 4.4 mi | Fairfield, OH | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Liberty Nursing Center of Colerain INC | 4.5 mi | Cincinnati, OH | ★☆☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Clovernook Health Care and Rehabilitation Center | 4.7 mi | Cincinnati, OH | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
Other facilities in the same county
CMS records place this facility in Hamilton, OH — 69 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
- Twin Lakes — Cincinnati, OH · overall 5/5
- Twin Towers — Cincinnati, OH · overall 5/5
- Wellspring Health Center — Cincinnati, OH · overall 2/5
- Western Hills Retirement Village — Cincinnati, OH · overall 4/5
- Woods Edge Rehab and Nursing — Cincinnati, OH · overall 2/5
- Advanced Health Care of Cincinnati — Cincinnati, OH · overall 3/5
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 366364.