South CarolinaSummerville

Oakbrook Health and Rehabilitation Center

920 Travelers Boulevard, Summerville, SC 29485 · Dorchester County · 88 certified beds · avg 83 residents/day · certified since Dec 17, 1986

Part of chain: FUNDAMENTAL HEALTHCARE (66 facilities, chain avg rating 2.4★)

1/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
3
Serious findings on record
$22,564
Fines, last 3 years
3.30
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★☆☆☆☆1/5 · CMS overall rating: 1/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Jul 15, 2025 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Feb 11, 2025 · F-0693

The facility used feeding tubes without a valid medical reason or the resident's agreement, or did not provide proper care to residents who have feeding tubes.

Why it matters: Unnecessary or poorly managed feeding tubes can cause serious complications like lung infections and take away the ability to eat normally.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Feb 16, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Feb 11, 2025 · F-0697

The facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it.

Why it matters: Untreated pain causes needless suffering and can lead to depression, poor sleep, and declining health.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Feb 16, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (13)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
May 5, 2026F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not have a registered nurse on duty at least 8 hours a day, or did not have a registered nurse serving full-time as director of nursing.
May 5, 2026F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
May 5, 2026F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility's menus did not meet residents' nutritional needs, or were not prepared in advance, followed as written, kept up to date, or reviewed by a dietician.
May 5, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Jul 15, 2025▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Feb 11, 2025▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility used feeding tubes without a valid medical reason or the resident's agreement, or did not provide proper care to residents who have feeding tubes.
Feb 11, 2025▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it.
Feb 11, 2025F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Feb 11, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Feb 11, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not allow residents to take their own medications when a clinical review showed they could do so safely. Residents have this right if their care team determines it's appropriate.
Feb 11, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication.
Apr 9, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not fully assess residents on time — a complete assessment of health, abilities, and needs is required when a resident is first admitted and at least once every 12 months after that. · from a complaint
Apr 9, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (6 → 4).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202420D
202573J ▲
202640F

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

3 fines totaling $22,564.

DateTypeAmount / length
Jul 15, 2025Fine$13,260
Feb 11, 2025Fine$4,652
Feb 11, 2025Fine$4,652

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilitySouth Carolina avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.304.083.95bottom 16% in South Carolina; bottom 26% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.300.670.69bottom 9% in South Carolina; bottom 10% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing2.893.553.50bottom 17% in South Carolina; bottom 25% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.150.410.48bottom 4% in South Carolina; bottom 5% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)63.945.945.8bottom 9% in South Carolina; bottom 11% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)55.642.142.9bottom 26% in South Carolina; bottom 28% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.13, RN 0.29, weekend 2.73. Staffing rating: 1/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: 2/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Limited Liability company

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Thi of South Carolina, LLCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%08/01/2017
Castle, PattyIndividualW-2 Managing EmployeeNOT APPLICABLE09/28/2018
Castle, PattyIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE09/28/2018

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Hallmark Healthcare Center0.7 miSummerville, SC★★★☆☆3/5
Presbyterian Communities of South Carolina-Summerv5.1 miSummerville, SC★★★★☆4/5
White Oak Manor - Charleston5.4 miCharleston, SC★★★★☆4/5
Life Care Center of Charleston6.1 miN Charleston, SC★★★☆☆2/5
The Reserve Healthcare and Rehabilitation7.4 miCharleston, SC★★★★★5/5
Riverside Health and Rehab12.1 miCharleston, SC★☆☆☆☆2/5
NHC Healthcare - Charleston12.1 miCharleston, SC★★☆☆☆1/5
Ashley River Healthcare13.9 miCharleston, SC★★★★★4/5
Retreat at Wellmore of Daniel Island15.9 miCharleston, SC★★☆☆☆2/5
Kempton of Charleston16.9 miCharleston, SC★★★★★4/5
Johns Island Post Acute17.1 miJohns Island, SC★☆☆☆☆1/5abuseSFF
Pruitthealth- Moncks Corner18.0 miMoncks Corner, SC★★☆☆☆2/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Summerville →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 425156.