North CarolinaCherryville

Peak Resources-Cherryville

7615 Dallas Cherryville Highway, Cherryville, NC 28021 · Gaston County · 70 certified beds · avg 64 residents/day · certified since Aug 1, 1991

Part of chain: PEAK RESOURCES, INC. (8 facilities, chain avg rating 3.4★)

4/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
2.34
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (17)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Jul 16, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide activities that meet residents' needs and interests. Nursing homes must offer meaningful activity programs, not just leave residents idle.
Jul 16, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time.
Nov 13, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from misuse of their belongings or money — this is called misappropriation, and it includes theft or improper use of a resident's property or funds. · from a complaint
Apr 18, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not honor residents' right to voice complaints without discrimination or retaliation, or did not have a working complaint process that resolves issues promptly.
Apr 18, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Apr 18, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Apr 18, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not run an ongoing quality assurance committee that reviews care problems and creates plans to fix them.
Apr 18, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away.
Apr 18, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow.
Apr 18, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
Apr 18, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Apr 18, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections.
Apr 18, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Apr 18, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not prepare and serve food in a form that meets each resident's individual needs — for example, chopped, pureed, or softened food for residents with chewing or swallowing problems.
Apr 18, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide food that accounts for each resident's allergies, intolerances, and personal preferences, or did not offer appealing alternatives.
Apr 18, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards.
Apr 18, 2024C · Minimal risk, facility-wideThe facility did not post its nurse staffing information every day. Nursing homes must publicly display how many nurses and aides are on duty each day.

Inspection trend by year

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
2024150E
202620E

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityNorth Carolina avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)2.344.013.95bottom 1% in North Carolina; bottom 2% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.420.640.69bottom 30% in North Carolina; bottom 26% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing2.013.563.50bottom 1% in North Carolina; bottom 2% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.250.410.48bottom 33% in North Carolina; bottom 22% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)48.249.045.8top 48% in North Carolina; bottom 42% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)33.345.742.9top 28% in North Carolina; top 33% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 2.27, RN 0.41, weekend 1.94. Staffing rating: 1/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Nunn, HaroldIndividual5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest03/23/1999
Hill, BrianIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE03/01/2015
Hill, BrianIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE03/01/2015
Mikell, CherylIndividualW-2 Managing EmployeeNOT APPLICABLE05/21/2009
Nunn, HaroldIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE03/18/2004
Nunn, ToddIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2013
Peak Resources INCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE07/31/2003

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Carolina Care Health and Rehabilitation2.5 miCherryville, NC★★★★★5/5
The Greens at Lincolnton7.8 miLincolnton, NC★★☆☆☆2/5
Cardinal Healthcare and Rehabilitation8.3 miLincolnton, NC★★★★★4/5
Lincolnton Rehabilitation Center8.8 miLincolnton, NC★★★☆☆2/5
White Oak Manor-Kings Mountain9.9 miKings Mountain, NC★★☆☆☆2/5abuse
Cleveland Pines11.7 miShelby, NC★★★☆☆3/5
Accordius Health at Gastonia11.9 miGastonia, NC★★★★☆3/5
White Oak Manor-Shelby12.5 miShelby, NC★★☆☆☆2/5
Gastonia Health & Rehab Center12.8 miGastonia, NC★☆☆☆☆2/5
Belaire Health Care Center13.3 miGastonia, NC★★☆☆☆2/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Cherryville →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 345395.