MassachusettsBillerica

Life Care Center of Merrimack Valley

80 Boston Road, Billerica, MA 01862 · Middlesex County · 124 certified beds · avg 112 residents/day · certified since Mar 15, 1992

Part of chain: LIFE CARE CENTERS OF AMERICA (194 facilities, chain avg rating 3.4★)

2/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
4
Serious findings on record
$161,920
Fines, last 3 years
3.75
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 2/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Actual harm, repeated · Dec 4, 2024 · F-0600 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.

Why it matters: Abuse and neglect cause direct physical and emotional harm and are among the most serious failures a nursing home can have.

Severity (H): Multiple residents were actually harmed by the same failure — a pattern of real harm, not an isolated incident.

Corrected: Jan 2, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, repeated · Dec 4, 2024 · F-0686 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.

Why it matters: Bedsores are painful, can become deeply infected, and in serious cases can be life-threatening.

Severity (H): Multiple residents were actually harmed by the same failure — a pattern of real harm, not an isolated incident.

Corrected: Jan 2, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, repeated · Dec 4, 2024 · F-0841 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not designate a physician to serve as medical director — the doctor responsible for overseeing resident care policies and coordinating medical care across the facility.

Why it matters: Without a medical director, there is no doctor accountable for the overall quality of medical care.

Severity (H): Multiple residents were actually harmed by the same failure — a pattern of real harm, not an isolated incident.

Corrected: Jan 2, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Dec 4, 2024 · F-0655

The facility did not create and follow a basic care plan covering a new resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of admission. The first days are when a new resident is most vulnerable.

Why it matters: In the critical first days, staff may not know a new resident's medications, diet, or fall risks.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Jan 2, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (27)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Apr 23, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away. · from a complaint
Dec 10, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide safe, appropriate care for residents who need dialysis — the treatment that filters the blood when kidneys fail.
Dec 10, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication.
Dec 10, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Dec 10, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make sure special medical diets — like low-sodium or diabetic diets — were properly ordered by the resident's doctor or managed by a qualified dietitian as state law allows.
Aug 14, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not make sure residents were fully informed about their own health, care, and treatments in a way they could understand. · from a complaint
Dec 4, 2024▲ H · Actual harm, repeatedThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
Dec 4, 2024▲ H · Actual harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · from a complaint
Dec 4, 2024▲ H · Actual harm, repeatedThe facility did not designate a physician to serve as medical director — the doctor responsible for overseeing resident care policies and coordinating medical care across the facility. · from a complaint
Dec 4, 2024▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not create and follow a basic care plan covering a new resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of admission. The first days are when a new resident is most vulnerable.
Dec 4, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not make sure its nurses and nurse aides had the skills and training needed to properly care for every resident. · from a complaint
Dec 4, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Dec 4, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility was not managed in a way that uses its money, staff, and resources effectively and efficiently to care for residents. · from a complaint
Dec 4, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have a proper governing body legally responsible for its policies and operations, or that body failed to appoint a properly licensed administrator to manage the facility. · from a complaint
Dec 4, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not conduct and document a facility-wide assessment of what staff, supplies, and resources it needs to care for its residents properly — during everyday operations, nights, weekends, and emergencies. · from a complaint
Dec 4, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have a written plan describing how it runs its quality improvement program — the ongoing process of finding problems in care and fixing them. · from a complaint
Dec 4, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Dec 4, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Dec 4, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not safely and appropriately administer IV fluids (fluids given through a vein) for residents who needed them.
Dec 4, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe, appropriate care for residents who need dialysis — the treatment that filters the blood when kidneys fail.
Dec 4, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Dec 4, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not bring in qualified outside professionals to provide a required service when it didn't have a qualified professional on staff. · from a complaint
Dec 4, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards.
Nov 22, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Nov 22, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
Nov 22, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems.
Nov 22, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (17 → 4).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202340E
2024174H ▲
202550E
202610D

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

1 fine totaling $161,920.

DateTypeAmount / length
Dec 4, 2024Fine$161,920

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityMassachusetts avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.753.893.95bottom 49% in Massachusetts; bottom 49% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.650.650.69top 40% in Massachusetts; top 42% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.293.513.50bottom 43% in Massachusetts; bottom 47% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.450.460.48top 39% in Massachusetts; top 40% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)38.838.245.8bottom 45% in Massachusetts; top 33% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)52.442.642.9bottom 30% in Massachusetts; bottom 32% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.09, RN 0.71, weekend 3.59. Staffing rating: 3/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 4/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Limited Liability company

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Preston, ForrestIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE08/06/2015
Cross, CindyIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE08/06/2015
Faustin, MoselineIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE05/22/2023
Faustin, MoselineIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE05/22/2023
Faustin, MoselineIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE02/12/2025
Finkel, NoahIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2021
Finkel, NoahIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/05/2025
Fletcher, ToddIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2021
Henry, TerryIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE08/06/2015
Janiak, AndreaIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE08/24/2022
Janiak, AndreaIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE08/24/2022
Lay, LisaIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE04/24/2017
Life Care Centers of America, INC.OrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE08/06/2015
Life Care Centers of America, INC.OrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE02/12/2025
Long, ZofiaIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE07/01/1999
Long, ZofiaIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE07/01/1999
Preston, AubreyIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE11/27/2024
Preston, ForrestIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE08/06/2015
Preston, ForrestIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/12/2004
Swanker, RichardIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2022

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
New England Pediatric Care0.0 miNorth Billerica, MA★★★★★5/5
Sunny Acres Skilled Nursing and Rehabilitation Ctr1.4 miChelmsford, MA★★★★☆4/5
Vantage at Lowell LLC2.8 miLowell, MA★★☆☆☆2/5
Blaire House of Tewksbury3.1 miTewksbury, MA★☆☆☆☆1/5SFF
Regalcare at Lowell3.5 miLowell, MA★☆☆☆☆1/5
Palm Springs Post Acute3.8 miChelmsford, MA★★☆☆☆2/5
Care One at Lowell4.1 miLowell, MA★★★☆☆3/5
Fairhaven Healthcare Center4.4 miLowell, MA★★☆☆☆2/5
D'youville Senior Care4.9 miLowell, MA★☆☆☆☆1/5
Northwood Rehabilitation & Healthcare Center5.0 miLowell, MA★☆☆☆☆1/5
D'youville Care for Advanced Therapy5.2 miLowell, MA★★★★★5/5
Carleton-Willard Village Retirement & Nursing Ctr6.7 miBedford, MA★★★★★3/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Billerica →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 225546.