MassachusettsStoneham

Life Care Center of Stoneham

25 Woodland Road, Stoneham, MA 02180 · Middlesex County · 94 certified beds · avg 79 residents/day · certified since Aug 12, 1997

Part of chain: LIFE CARE CENTERS OF AMERICA (194 facilities, chain avg rating 3.4★)

3/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
5
Serious findings on record
$39,559
Fines, last 3 years
3.71
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Mar 19, 2025 · F-0600 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.

Why it matters: Abuse and neglect cause direct physical and emotional harm and are among the most serious failures a nursing home can have.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Mar 18, 2025 (Past Non-Compliance)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Mar 19, 2025 · F-0658 · triggered by a complaint

The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow.

Why it matters: Care that falls below professional standards can directly harm a resident's health and recovery.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Mar 18, 2025 (Past Non-Compliance)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Mar 19, 2025 · F-0697 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it.

Why it matters: Untreated pain causes needless suffering and can lead to depression, poor sleep, and declining health.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Mar 18, 2025 (Past Non-Compliance)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Sep 14, 2023 · F-0658

The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow.

Why it matters: Care that falls below professional standards can directly harm a resident's health and recovery.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Oct 10, 2023 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Sep 14, 2023 · F-0684

The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.

Why it matters: Care that strays from doctor's orders or ignores the resident's wishes can lead to declining health and avoidable harm.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Oct 10, 2023 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (31)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Sep 17, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs.
Sep 17, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Sep 17, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Mar 19, 2025▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
Mar 19, 2025▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · from a complaint
Mar 19, 2025▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it. · from a complaint
Sep 19, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility employed staff who were not licensed, certified, or registered as required by state law.
Sep 19, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
Sep 19, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Sep 19, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
Sep 19, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Sep 19, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.
Sep 19, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Sep 19, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards.
Aug 29, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint
Aug 29, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make sure its nurses and nurse aides had the skills and training needed to properly care for every resident. · from a complaint
Sep 14, 2023▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow.
Sep 14, 2023▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Sep 14, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time.
Sep 14, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Sep 14, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Sep 14, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
Sep 14, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make sure residents were fully informed about their own health, care, and treatments in a way they could understand.
Sep 14, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents' personal and medical information private and confidential.
Sep 14, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation.
Sep 14, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do.
Sep 14, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Sep 14, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
Sep 14, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline.
Sep 14, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards.
Sep 14, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (8 → 3).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
2023152G ▲
2024100E
202563G ▲

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

2 fines totaling $39,559.

DateTypeAmount / length
Mar 19, 2025Fine$9,620
Sep 14, 2023Fine$29,939

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityMassachusetts avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.713.893.95bottom 47% in Massachusetts; bottom 47% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.770.650.69top 21% in Massachusetts; top 30% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.343.513.50bottom 46% in Massachusetts; bottom 49% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.550.460.48top 24% in Massachusetts; top 28% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)32.038.245.8top 33% in Massachusetts; top 18% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)31.342.642.9top 28% in Massachusetts; top 32% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.00, RN 0.83, weekend 3.59. Staffing rating: 4/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Limited Liability company

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Developers Investment Company INCOrganizationDirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE08/28/1987
Preston, ForrestIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE08/28/1987
Berdzenishvili, MayaIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE02/01/2024
Berdzenishvili, MayaIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/18/2025
Cote, KimberlyIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE09/06/2023
Cote, KimberlyIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE09/06/2023
Cross, CindyIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE03/25/1996
Cross, CindyIndividualIndividual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE10/07/2025
Developers Investment Company INCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/28/2020
Fletcher, ToddIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE12/13/2024
Henry, TerryIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE08/16/1999
Lay, LisaIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE04/24/2017
Lay, LisaIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE02/09/2018
Life Care Centers of America, INC.OrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE03/25/1996
Life Care Centers of America, INC.OrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/25/1996
Long, ZofiaIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE03/15/2004
Long, ZofiaIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE03/15/2004
Nguyen, DennisIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE12/21/2024
Nguyen, DennisIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE12/21/2024
Nguyen, DennisIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/18/2025

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Melrose Healthcare0.9 miMelrose, MA★☆☆☆☆1/5SFF
Regalcare at Glen Ridge1.4 miMedford, MA★☆☆☆☆1/5
Elmhurst Healthcare (the)1.5 miMelrose, MA★★★★★5/5
Regalcare at Courtyard-Medford1.9 miMedford, MA★☆☆☆☆1/5abuseSFF
Greenwood Nursing & Rehabilitation Center2.1 miWakefield, MA★★★★★4/5
Medford Rehabilitation and Nursing Center2.5 miMedford, MA★★★☆☆3/5
Dexter House Healthcare2.5 miMalden, MA★★★☆☆3/5
Winchester Rehabilitation and Nursing Center2.8 miWinchester, MA★★★★★4/5
Aberjona Rehabilitation and Nursing Center2.8 miWinchester, MA★★★★★5/5
Bear Hill Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center3.5 miStoneham, MA★★★★★4/5
Regalcare at Wakefield3.7 miWakefield, MA★☆☆☆☆1/5
Rehabilitation & Nursing Center at Everett (the)3.8 miEverett, MA★★★☆☆4/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Stoneham →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 225732.