1404 S Salisbury Avenue, Spencer, NC 28159 (opens Google Maps) · Rowan County · (704) 633-3892· 70 certified beds · avg 60 residents/day · certified since Aug 11, 1988 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
▲ Immediate jeopardy, isolated · Aug 21, 2024 · F-0760
The facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication.
Why it matters: A serious medication error can cause real harm, hospitalization, or worse.
Severity (J): Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety was cited. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Sep 13, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
Showing the latest 3 of 9 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not provide proper foot care for residents. Foot care includes routine care like nail trimming and attention to foot problems, which matter greatly for older adults. F-0687
The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. F-0812
The facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication. F-0760
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 10, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide proper foot care for residents. Foot care includes routine care like nail trimming and attention to foot problems, which matter greatly for older adults. · F-0687 |
| Dec 10, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Aug 21, 2024 | ▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, isolated | The facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication. · F-0760 |
| Aug 21, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · from a complaint · F-0584 |
| Aug 21, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · F-0658 |
| Oct 11, 2023 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not have a registered nurse on duty at least 8 hours a day, or did not have a registered nurse serving full-time as director of nursing. · F-0727 |
| Oct 11, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · F-0641 |
| Oct 11, 2023 | B · Potential for minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not enter each resident's assessment information into the required format and send it to the state within 7 days of completing the assessment, as the rules require. · F-0640 |
| Oct 11, 2023 | B · Potential for minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not post its nurse staffing information every day. Nursing homes must publicly display how many nurses and aides are on duty each day. · F-0732 |
Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (3 → 2).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 4 | 0 | F |
| 2024 | 3 | 1 | J ▲ |
| 2025 | 2 | 0 | D |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
1 fine totaling $10,039.
Every penalty CMS publishes for this facility in the 3-year window is listed —none excluded. The count and the dollar total come from two different CMS datasets and agree for this facility. Penalties older than the window are dropped by CMS before publication, not by us.
| Date | Type | Amount / length |
|---|---|---|
| Aug 21, 2024 | Fine | $10,039 |
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | North Carolina avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.15 | 4.01 | 3.95 | bottom 12% in North Carolina; bottom 19% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.43 | 0.64 | 0.69 | bottom 31% in North Carolina; bottom 27% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 2.88 | 3.56 | 3.50 | bottom 19% in North Carolina; bottom 25% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.25 | 0.41 | 0.48 | bottom 32% in North Carolina; bottom 21% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 35.1 | 49.0 | 45.8 | top 17% in North Carolina; top 24% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 25.0 | 45.7 | 42.9 | top 17% in North Carolina; top 20% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.25, RN 0.44, weekend 2.97.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.25 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 2/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 2/5 · short-stay residents: 4/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Compass Healthcare and Rehab Rowan, LLC. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Individual
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nunn, Todd | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 100% | 12/21/2018 |
| Nunn, Todd | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/21/2018 |
| Nunn, Todd | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/21/2018 |
All 3 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Autumn Care of Salisbury | 1.3 mi | Salisbury, NC | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| NC State Veterans Home - Salisbury | 1.5 mi | Salisbury, NC | ★★★★☆ | 2/5 | |
| Piedmont Health & Rehab Center | 1.9 mi | Salisbury, NC | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Meadowbrook Health & Rehabilitation | 2.7 mi | Salisbury, NC | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Trinity Oaks | 3.3 mi | Salisbury, NC | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| The Laurels of Salisbury | 4.5 mi | Salisbury, NC | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Liberty Commons Nsg and Rehab Ctr of Rowan County | 6.1 mi | Salisbury, NC | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Davidson Health & Rehab Center | 9.9 mi | Lexington, NC | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
| Pine Acres Center for Nursing and Rehabilitation | 12.0 mi | Lexington, NC | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Lexington Health Care Center | 14.8 mi | Lexington, NC | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | abuse |
| Big Elm Retirement and Nursing Centers | 15.7 mi | Kannapolis, NC | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Abbotts Creek Center | 16.9 mi | Lexington, NC | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 |
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 345288.
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details