North CarolinaSalisbury

NC State Veterans Home - Salisbury

1601 Brenner Ave., Building #10, Salisbury, NC 28145 · Rowan County · 99 certified beds · avg 83 residents/day · certified since Nov 22, 2004

2/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
1
Serious findings on record
$12,444
Fines, last 3 years
4.98
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Dec 12, 2025 · F-0880

The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.

Why it matters: Weak infection control lets illnesses like flu, COVID-19, and drug-resistant infections spread quickly among vulnerable residents.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

Corrected: Jan 13, 2026 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (17)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Dec 12, 2025▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Dec 12, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
Dec 12, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility gave residents unnecessary mind-altering (psychotropic) medications, or used drugs in a way that restrained residents by dulling their ability to think, move, or function.
Dec 12, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft. These written safeguards are the foundation of resident protection.
Dec 12, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow.
Dec 12, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Dec 12, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections.
Dec 12, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems.
Dec 12, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards.
Dec 12, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures for offering residents flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
Dec 12, 2025C · Minimal risk, facility-wideThe facility did not post the names, addresses, and phone numbers of state agencies and advocacy groups, along with a notice that residents may file complaints with the state survey agency.
Dec 12, 2025B · Minimal risk, repeatedThe facility did not properly inform residents or their representatives about arbitration agreements — contracts that give up the right to sue in court — including their right to refuse to sign.
Aug 8, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Aug 8, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' right to make their own choices about their daily lives, such as when to wake up, what to eat, or how to spend their time.
Aug 8, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
Feb 23, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
Feb 23, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not arrange hospice services for a resident who needed them, or help the resident move to a facility that could arrange hospice. Hospice provides comfort-focused care for people nearing the end of life.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (3 → 12).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202320D
202430E
2025121J ▲

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

1 fine totaling $12,444.

DateTypeAmount / length
Dec 12, 2025Fine$12,444

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityNorth Carolina avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)4.984.013.95top 13% in North Carolina; top 13% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours1.190.640.69top 8% in North Carolina; top 10% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.963.563.50top 19% in North Carolina; top 24% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.530.410.48top 21% in North Carolina; top 30% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)43.949.045.8top 38% in North Carolina; top 47% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)14.345.742.9top 6% in North Carolina; top 7% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.79, RN 1.14, weekend 3.81. Staffing rating: 5/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: —/5

Who owns this facility

Government - State

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
NC Dept of Military and Veterans Affairs NC Division of Veter AffairsOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%03/31/2009
NC Dept of Military and Veterans Affairs NC Division of Veter AffairsOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE03/31/2009
Stephens, NicoleIndividualW-2 Managing EmployeeNOT APPLICABLE02/07/2019
Westbrook, TerryIndividualW-2 Managing EmployeeNOT APPLICABLE06/26/2019
Westbrook, TerryIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE06/26/2019

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Autumn Care of Salisbury0.1 miSalisbury, NC★★★★☆3/5
Compass Healthcare and Rehab Rowan, LLC1.5 miSpencer, NC★★★☆☆3/5
Piedmont Health & Rehab Center1.8 miSalisbury, NC★★☆☆☆2/5
Trinity Oaks2.3 miSalisbury, NC★★★★★4/5
Meadowbrook Health & Rehabilitation3.2 miSalisbury, NC★☆☆☆☆1/5
The Laurels of Salisbury4.8 miSalisbury, NC★★★☆☆3/5
Liberty Commons Nsg and Rehab Ctr of Rowan County5.2 miSalisbury, NC★★★☆☆3/5
Davidson Health & Rehab Center11.0 miLexington, NC★☆☆☆☆1/5abuse
Pine Acres Center for Nursing and Rehabilitation13.1 miLexington, NC★☆☆☆☆1/5
Big Elm Retirement and Nursing Centers14.6 miKannapolis, NC★★★★☆4/5
Lexington Health Care Center15.8 miLexington, NC★★☆☆☆2/5abuse
Kannapolis Health and Rehabilitation16.1 miKannapolis, NC★★☆☆☆2/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Salisbury →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 345531.