North CarolinaKannapolis

Kannapolis Health and Rehabilitation

1810 Concord Lake Road, Kannapolis, NC 28083 · Cabarrus County · 107 certified beds · avg 85 residents/day · certified since Apr 30, 1987

Part of chain: AVARDIS HEALTH (38 facilities, chain avg rating 2.0★)

2/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
4
Serious findings on record
$34,690
Fines, last 3 years
3.74
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 2/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Mar 18, 2026 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

Corrected: May 9, 2025 (Past Non-Compliance)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Jan 16, 2025 · F-0760 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication.

Why it matters: A serious medication error can cause real harm, hospitalization, or worse.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

Corrected: Sep 27, 2024 (Past Non-Compliance)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, repeated · Aug 10, 2023 · F-0697

The facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it.

Why it matters: Untreated pain causes needless suffering and can lead to depression, poor sleep, and declining health.

Severity (K): A life-threatening or extremely dangerous situation affected several residents. Among the most serious findings an inspection can produce.

Corrected: Oct 19, 2023 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Aug 10, 2023 · F-0561

The facility did not honor residents' right to make their own choices about their daily lives, such as when to wake up, what to eat, or how to spend their time.

Why it matters: Losing everyday choices makes residents feel powerless in their own home.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Oct 19, 2023 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (42)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Mar 18, 2026▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Mar 18, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Mar 18, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · from a complaint
Mar 18, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · from a complaint
Mar 18, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility used feeding tubes without a valid medical reason or the resident's agreement, or did not provide proper care to residents who have feeding tubes.
Mar 18, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not safely and appropriately administer IV fluids (fluids given through a vein) for residents who needed them.
Mar 18, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · from a complaint
Mar 18, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication. · from a complaint
Mar 18, 2026C · Minimal risk, facility-wideThe facility did not provide required paperwork or notices about a resident's needs, their right to appeal a transfer or discharge, or the facility's bed-hold policy (how long a bed is saved during a hospital stay).
Mar 18, 2026C · Minimal risk, facility-wideThe facility did not post its nurse staffing information every day. Nursing homes must publicly display how many nurses and aides are on duty each day.
Mar 18, 2026B · Minimal risk, repeatedThe facility did not honor residents' right to voice complaints without discrimination or retaliation, or did not have a working complaint process that resolves issues promptly. · from a complaint
Jan 16, 2025▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-offThe facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication. · from a complaint
Jan 16, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away.
Jan 16, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents' personal and medical information private and confidential. · from a complaint
Jan 16, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
Jan 16, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow.
Jan 16, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offWhen a resident had a planned discharge, the facility did not make sure the necessary information was communicated to the resident and to the doctors or facility taking over their care.
Jan 16, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · from a complaint
Jan 16, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems. · from a complaint
Jan 16, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents' medications free from unnecessary drugs. Residents should only take medicines they truly need, at the right dose, for a clear reason.
Jan 16, 2025B · Minimal risk, repeatedThe facility did not post its nurse staffing information every day. Nursing homes must publicly display how many nurses and aides are on duty each day.
Oct 19, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · from a complaint
Oct 19, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from misuse of their belongings or money — this is called misappropriation, and it includes theft or improper use of a resident's property or funds. · from a complaint
Oct 19, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · from a complaint
Oct 19, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Aug 10, 2023▲ K · Immediate jeopardy, repeatedThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it.
Aug 10, 2023▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' right to make their own choices about their daily lives, such as when to wake up, what to eat, or how to spend their time.
Aug 10, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not give residents proper notice about what Medicare or Medicaid covers, or about charges the resident might owe for services that aren't covered.
Aug 10, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · from a complaint
Aug 10, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication. · from a complaint
Aug 10, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures for offering residents flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
Aug 10, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away.
Aug 10, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.
Aug 10, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Aug 10, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · from a complaint
Aug 10, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time. · from a complaint
Aug 10, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not run an ongoing quality assurance committee that reviews care problems and creates plans to fix them. · from a complaint
Aug 10, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Aug 10, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not educate residents and staff about COVID-19 vaccination, offer the vaccine to those eligible after that education, or properly document everyone's vaccination status.
Aug 10, 2023B · Minimal risk, repeatedThe facility did not give the resident or their representative written notice of how long it would hold the resident's bed during a hospital stay or approved leave.
Aug 10, 2023B · Minimal risk, repeatedThe facility did not post its nurse staffing information every day. Nursing homes must publicly display how many nurses and aides are on duty each day.
Aug 10, 2023B · Minimal risk, repeatedThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (8 → 11).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
2023212K ▲
2025101J ▲
2026111J ▲

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

2 fines totaling $34,690.

DateTypeAmount / length
Mar 18, 2026Fine$17,345
Jan 16, 2025Fine$17,345

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityNorth Carolina avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.744.013.95top 45% in North Carolina; bottom 49% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.500.640.69bottom 45% in North Carolina; bottom 38% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.083.563.50bottom 36% in North Carolina; bottom 35% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.230.410.48bottom 27% in North Carolina; bottom 17% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)52.949.045.8bottom 40% in North Carolina; bottom 30% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)37.545.742.9top 36% in North Carolina; top 42% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.30, RN 0.44, weekend 2.72. Staffing rating: 3/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 3/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
CLR Holdco LLCOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2025
Kannapolis Parentco LLCOrganizationDirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2025
Ncop Holdco LLCOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2025
Nu C II Irrevocable TrustOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2025
Nu C Irrevocable TrustOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2025
SNF Care Centers LLCOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2025
Zenith Holdco II LLCOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2025
Zenith Holdco LLCOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2025
FC Encore Kannapolis LLCOrganization5% or Greater Security InterestNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2025
FC Encore Kannapolis LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2025
Hall, GeorgeIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2025
Hall, GeorgeIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2025
Hembree, AbigailIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2025
Hembree, AbigailIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2025
Hoback, TiffanyIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2025
Hoback, TiffanyIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2025
Hoback, TiffanyIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2025
Jones, TequillaIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2025
Jones, TequillaIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2025
Semones, BrandiIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2025

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
The Greens at Cabarrus0.8 miConcord, NC★★★★★4/5
Copperfield Health & Rehabilitation1.4 miConcord, NC★☆☆☆☆1/5abuse
Five Oaks Rehabilitation and Care Center1.7 miConcord, NC★★☆☆☆2/5
Cabarrus Health and Rehabilitation Center2.6 miConcord, NC★☆☆☆☆1/5SFF
Big Elm Retirement and Nursing Centers3.8 miKannapolis, NC★★★★☆4/5
The Gardens of Taylor Glen Retirement Community4.5 miConcord, NC★★★★☆4/5
Pruitthealth-Town Center9.7 miHarrisburg, NC★★★☆☆3/5
Liberty Commons Nsg and Rehab Ctr of Rowan County11.8 miSalisbury, NC★★★☆☆3/5
University Place Nursing and Rehabilitation Center13.2 miCharlotte, NC★☆☆☆☆2/5
Crestview Health & Rehabilitation13.7 miMooresville, NC★☆☆☆☆1/5SFF

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Kannapolis →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 345258.