How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
Kahl Home for the Aged & Infirmed
6701 Jersey Ridge Road, Davenport, IA 52807 (opens Google Maps) · Scott County · (563) 324-1621· 135 certified beds · avg 105 residents/day · certified since Jan 1, 1989 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: CARMELITE SISTERS FOR THE AGED & INFIRM (9 facilities, chain avg rating 2.8★)
2/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
inspected Mar 16, 2026
2
Serious findings on record
most recent Jul 3, 2025
$0
Fines, last 3 years
4.09
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)
Every record stays on this page.
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Jul 3, 2025 · F-0686 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Jul 3, 2025 · F-0686 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.
Why it matters: Bedsores are painful, can become deeply infected, and in serious cases can be life-threatening.
Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Jul 18, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Jul 3, 2025 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Jul 3, 2025 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.
Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Jul 3, 2025 (Past Non-Compliance)
Inspection findings in the public record
Showing the latest 3 of 15 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · from a complaint F-0812
The facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures for offering residents flu and pneumonia vaccinations. F-0883
The facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration. · from a complaint F-0692
View all 15 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 16, 2026 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · from a complaint · F-0812 |
| Mar 16, 2026 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures for offering residents flu and pneumonia vaccinations. · F-0883 |
| Mar 16, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration. · from a complaint · F-0692 |
| Mar 16, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Dec 30, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · from a complaint · F-0658 |
| Dec 30, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint · F-0880 |
| Jul 3, 2025 | ▲ G · Actual harm, isolated | The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · from a complaint · F-0686 |
| Jul 3, 2025 | ▲ G · Actual harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint · F-0689 |
| Feb 13, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Feb 13, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Feb 13, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have enough nursing staff each day to meet every resident's needs, or did not have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift. Adequate staffing is one of the strongest predictors of good care. · F-0725 |
| May 30, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint · F-0689 |
| May 30, 2024 | C · Potential for minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not give the resident or their representative written notice of how long it would hold the resident's bed during a hospital stay or approved leave. · from a complaint · F-0625 |
| Mar 28, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care. · F-0578 |
| Mar 28, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · F-0658 |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (3 → 4).
All citationsSerious citations (G–L)
2024
All citations: 4
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2025
All citations: 7
Serious citations (G–L): 2
2026
All citations: 4
Serious citations (G–L): 0
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 4 | 0 | D |
| 2025 | 7 | 2 | G ▲ |
| 2026 | 4 | 0 | F |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
What these staffing numbers mean →
This facilityIowa averageU.S. average
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)
This facility: 4.09
Iowa average: 4.37
U.S. average: 3.95
Registered Nurse hours
This facility: 0.78
Iowa average: 0.85
U.S. average: 0.69
Weekend total nurse staffing
This facility: 3.79
Iowa average: 3.86
U.S. average: 3.50
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Iowa avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 4.09 | 4.37 | 3.95 | bottom 43% in Iowa; top 36% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.78 | 0.85 | 0.69 | bottom 49% in Iowa; top 29% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 3.79 | 3.86 | 3.50 | top 48% in Iowa; top 30% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.47 | 0.51 | 0.48 | top 47% in Iowa; top 36% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 37.2 | 44.0 | 45.8 | top 36% in Iowa; top 29% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 20.0 | 42.1 | 42.9 | top 18% in Iowa; top 13% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.96, RN 0.76, weekend 3.68.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.96 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 4/5.
Quality measures: assessments & claims
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 4/5
Costs & payment
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Kahl Home for the Aged & Infirmed. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Calculate a stay from a quote you receive
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Before you compare prices
- Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
- Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
- Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
Who owns this facility
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
Non profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anderson, John | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/01/2025 |
| Brown, Ann | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/09/2009 |
| Dimaria, Lillian | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2021 |
| Dimaria, Lillian | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2021 |
| Haley, Margaret | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2021 |
| Haley, Margaret | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2021 |
| Hufsey, Kimberly | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/28/2017 |
| Hufsey, Kimberly | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/03/2025 |
| McCabe, Robert | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2013 |
| McCabe, Robert | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2013 |
| McCarthy, Michael | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/09/2009 |
| McCarthy, Michael | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/08/2009 |
| Pranger, Judith | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2013 |
| Rehmann, Mary | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/09/2009 |
| Rehmann, Mary | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/09/2009 |
| Staley, Thomas | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/10/2025 |
| Staley, Thomas | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/10/2025 |
| Sullivan, Maureen | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2025 |
| The Carmelite Sisters for the Aged and Infirm | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/29/2013 |
| The Carmelite System INC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/29/2013 |
Showing 20 of 22 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 2 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.
Other facilities in the same chain
CMS lists this facility under the chain Carmelite Sisters for the Aged & Infirm — 9 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
- St Patrick's Residence — Naperville, IL · overall 3/5abuse
- Carmel Manor — Fort Thomas, KY · overall 1/5
- St Patrick's Manor — Framingham, MA · overall 4/5
- St Patrick's Home — Bronx, NY · overall 2/5
- Teresian House Nursing Home Co INC — Albany, NY · overall 3/5
- Mother Angeline McCrory Manor — Columbus, OH · overall 1/5
- Garvey Manor — Hollidaysburg, PA · overall 4/5
- Lourdes-Noreen McKeen Residence for Geriatric Care — West Palm Beach, FL · overall 4/5
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking.
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "How do you prevent bedsores for residents who can't move themselves, and how often are at-risk residents repositioned?"
- "What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
- "What did your most recent kitchen inspection find, and can I see how food is stored and prepared?"
- "What percentage of your residents and staff are vaccinated against flu and pneumonia, and how do you offer the vaccines?"
- "How do you monitor residents' weight and eating, and what happens when someone starts losing weight?"
- "Who leads your infection prevention program, and how do you make sure staff follow practices like hand hygiene every day?"
- "Can you tell me what this citation involved and what steps you took to bring care back up to standard?"
- "What is your nurse and aide staffing ratio on each shift, including nights and weekends?"
Also worth asking anywhere
- "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
- "Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
- "CMS reports 37% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
- "The ownership record on file lists 22 owning or managing parties — who makes the decisions about staffing levels?"
- "Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"
Nearby facilities (12 closest of 20 within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Harmony Utica Ridge | 1.7 mi | Davenport, IA | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Bettendorf Health Care Center | 2.7 mi | Bettendorf, IA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Davenport Lutheran Home | 2.8 mi | Davenport, IA | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Ridgecrest Village | 2.8 mi | Davenport, IA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
| Ivy at Davenport | 3.5 mi | Davenport, IA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | SFF |
| The Summit of Bettendorf | 3.5 mi | Bettendorf, IA | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Harmony Davenport | 3.8 mi | Davenport, IA | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| The Vistas at Bettendorf | 4.8 mi | Bettendorf, IA | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| St Anthony's Nsg & Rehab Ctr | 6.0 mi | Rock Island, IL | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Good Samaritan - Davenport | 6.1 mi | Davenport, IA | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| River Valley Nursing and Rehabilitation | 6.2 mi | Pleasant Valley, IA | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Allure of the Quad Cities | 6.4 mi | Moline, IL | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 165146.
This page is the printable visit checklist. If your browser did not open the print dialog automatically, use File → Print (Ctrl/⌘-P).