ConnecticutRocky Hill

John L. Levitow Health Care Center

287 West St, Rocky Hill, CT 06067 · Capitol County · 125 certified beds · avg 85 residents/day · certified since Mar 4, 2020

4/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
6.29
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 5/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (15)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Feb 25, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility allowed residents to lose the ability to do daily activities — like bathing, dressing, and eating — when there was no medical reason for the decline. Good care helps residents keep the abilities they have.
Feb 25, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide activities that meet residents' needs and interests. Nursing homes must offer meaningful activity programs, not just leave residents idle.
Feb 25, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature.
Feb 25, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' right to make their own choices about their daily lives, such as when to wake up, what to eat, or how to spend their time.
Feb 25, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away.
Feb 25, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow.
Feb 25, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Feb 16, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not verify that its nurse aides had completed their required training, or did not retrain aides who had been out of nurse aide work for 2 years.
Feb 16, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation.
Feb 16, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do.
Feb 16, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Feb 16, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Jan 31, 2020D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide routine dental care and 24-hour emergency dental care for residents.
Jan 31, 2020C · Minimal risk, facility-wideThe facility did not give residents reasonable access to and privacy in using ways to communicate, such as phones, mail, and email. Residents have the right to stay in touch with the outside world privately.
Jan 31, 2020B · Minimal risk, repeatedThe facility did not conduct and document a facility-wide assessment of what staff, supplies, and resources it needs to care for its residents properly — during everyday operations, nights, weekends, and emergencies.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (5 → 7).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202030D
202350E
202570E

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityConnecticut avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)6.293.803.95top 1% in Connecticut; top 3% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours1.740.700.69top 4% in Connecticut; top 3% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing5.603.433.50top 1% in Connecticut; top 3% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)1.140.460.48top 4% in Connecticut; top 4% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)12.037.445.8top 1% in Connecticut; top 1% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)3.738.642.9top 1% in Connecticut; top 2% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 5.61, RN 1.55, weekend 5.00. Staffing rating: 5/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: —/5

Who owns this facility

Government - State

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
State of ConnecticutOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%03/04/2020
Celtic Consulting LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE10/21/2019
Mortensen, EricIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE03/01/2019
Mortensen, EricIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/01/2019
Nelson, LauraIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE09/14/2018
Nelson, LauraIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE09/14/2018
State of ConnecticutOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2025
Welch, RonaldIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE06/02/2023
Welch, RonaldIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE06/02/2023
Welch, RonaldIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE06/02/2023

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
60 West0.6 miRocky Hill, CT★★★★★5/5
Apple Rehab Rocky Hill1.1 miRocky Hill, CT★★☆☆☆2/5
Maple View Health & Rehabilitation Center1.6 miRocky Hill, CT★★★★★5/5
Pilgrim Manor3.6 miCromwell, CT★★★★★4/5
Autumn Lake Healthcare at Cromwell3.6 miCromwell, CT★★★★☆3/5
Bel-Air Manor Nursing & Rehabilitation Center4.3 miNewington, CT★★★☆☆3/5
Apple Rehab Cromwell4.4 miCromwell, CT★★☆☆☆2/5
Jefferson House4.4 miNewington, CT★★★★★4/5
Civita Care Center at Newington4.5 miNewington, CT★☆☆☆☆1/5abuse
Civita Care Center at Salmon Brook5.1 miGlastonbury, CT★☆☆☆☆1/5
Portland Care & Rehab Centre, INC5.2 miPortland, CT★★★★★4/5
Avery Nursing Home/Noble Building6.2 miHartford, CT★☆☆☆☆1/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Rocky Hill →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 075443.