How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
60 West Street, Rocky Hill, CT 06067 (opens Google Maps) · Capitol County · (860) 529-0880· 95 certified beds · avg 93 residents/day · certified since Aug 26, 2016 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: ICARE HEALTH NETWORK (12 facilities, chain avg rating 2.8★)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★★★5/5 · CMS overall rating: 5/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Showing the latest 3 of 16 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. F-0812
The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · from a complaint F-0842
The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. F-0600
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 24, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Aug 7, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · from a complaint · F-0842 |
| Aug 16, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · F-0600 |
| Aug 16, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · F-0609 |
| Aug 16, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · F-0610 |
| Aug 16, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Aug 16, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not maintain an effective pest control program to prevent or deal with mice, insects, or other pests. · F-0925 |
| Aug 16, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away. · from a complaint · F-0580 |
| Aug 16, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · F-0657 |
| Aug 16, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · F-0658 |
| Aug 16, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · F-0684 |
| Aug 16, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689 |
| Aug 16, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide or arrange dental services for its residents. Nursing homes are responsible for making sure residents can get dental care. · F-0791 |
| Aug 16, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · from a complaint · F-0842 |
| Sep 3, 2021 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · F-0600 |
| Sep 3, 2021 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems. · F-0756 |
Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (12 → 1).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 2 | 0 | D |
| 2023 | 12 | 0 | E |
| 2024 | 1 | 0 | D |
| 2025 | 1 | 0 | E |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Connecticut avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 5.39 | 3.80 | 3.95 | top 5% in Connecticut; top 8% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.63 | 0.70 | 0.69 | top 47% in Connecticut; top 45% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 4.69 | 3.43 | 3.50 | top 7% in Connecticut; top 9% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.28 | 0.46 | 0.48 | bottom 27% in Connecticut; bottom 27% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 27.1 | 37.4 | 45.8 | top 18% in Connecticut; top 10% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 23.1 | 38.6 | 42.9 | top 23% in Connecticut; top 18% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.12, RN 0.48, weekend 3.59.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (4.12 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 5/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: —/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for 60 West. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Regional context: $525.78/day — Connecticut statewide average for a semi-private nursing-facility room, September 30, 2025. This is a historical regional figure, not this facility's price or a prediction. View the OPM source.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Limited Liability company
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LTC Associates LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 10/31/2012 |
| Montefiore Investment Trust | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 10/31/2012 |
| Rocky Associates LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 10/31/2012 |
| Securecare Options LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 100% | 10/31/2012 |
| Universal General Trust | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 10/31/2012 |
| Vantage Capital Investors LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 10/31/2012 |
| Landi, Michael | Individual | W-2 Managing Employee | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/21/2022 |
| Wright, Christopher | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/31/2012 |
All 8 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.
CMS lists this facility under the chain Icare Health Network — 12 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 11 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| John L. Levitow Health Care Center | 0.6 mi | Rocky Hill, CT | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Apple Rehab Rocky Hill | 0.7 mi | Rocky Hill, CT | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Maple View Health & Rehabilitation Center | 1.8 mi | Rocky Hill, CT | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Autumn Lake Healthcare at Cromwell | 3.7 mi | Cromwell, CT | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Pilgrim Manor | 3.8 mi | Cromwell, CT | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Civita Care Center at Salmon Brook | 4.8 mi | Glastonbury, CT | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Jefferson House | 4.8 mi | Newington, CT | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Apple Rehab Cromwell | 4.8 mi | Cromwell, CT | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Bel-Air Manor Nursing & Rehabilitation Center | 4.9 mi | Newington, CT | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Civita Care Center at Newington | 5.0 mi | Newington, CT | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
| Portland Care & Rehab Centre, INC | 5.2 mi | Portland, CT | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Glastonbury Center for Health & Rehabilitation | 5.9 mi | Glastonbury, CT | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
CMS records place this facility in Capitol, CT — 65 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 075442.
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details