How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
51 N Main St, Inman, SC 29349 (opens Google Maps) · Spartanburg County · (864) 472-9370· 40 certified beds · avg 37 residents/day · certified since Jul 1, 1978 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Showing the latest 3 of 11 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature. F-0804
The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. F-0880
The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. F-0812
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 3, 2025 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature. · F-0804 |
| Apr 3, 2025 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Mar 7, 2024 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Mar 7, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not give residents (and their representatives and the ombudsman, a state advocate for residents) proper advance notice before a transfer or discharge, including information about their right to appeal. · F-0623 |
| Mar 7, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not give the resident or their representative written notice of how long it would hold the resident's bed during a hospital stay or approved leave. · F-0625 |
| Mar 7, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · F-0677 |
| Mar 7, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · F-0695 |
| Feb 18, 2022 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not provide food that accounts for each resident's allergies, intolerances, and personal preferences, or did not offer appealing alternatives. · F-0806 |
| Feb 18, 2022 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Feb 18, 2022 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not honor residents' right to voice complaints without discrimination or retaliation, or did not have a working complaint process that resolves issues promptly. · F-0585 |
| Feb 18, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · F-0755 |
Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (5 → 2).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 4 | 0 | F |
| 2024 | 5 | 0 | F |
| 2025 | 2 | 0 | F |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | South Carolina avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.75 | 4.08 | 3.95 | bottom 42% in South Carolina; bottom 49% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.61 | 0.67 | 0.69 | top 43% in South Carolina; top 47% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 3.62 | 3.55 | 3.50 | top 36% in South Carolina; top 37% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.69 | 0.41 | 0.48 | top 14% in South Carolina; top 16% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 48.6 | 45.9 | 45.8 | bottom 41% in South Carolina; bottom 40% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 28.6 | 42.1 | 42.9 | top 27% in South Carolina; top 26% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.25, RN 0.52, weekend 3.13.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.25 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 4/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: —/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Inman Healthcare. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Limited Liability company
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bokor, Michael | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2020 |
| Greenwald, Michael | Individual | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 03/01/2019 |
| MDB Holdings 1 LLC | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2020 |
| Yakar Holdings, LLC | Organization | Direct Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/01/2019 |
| Yakar Operating LLC | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/01/2019 |
| Bokor, Michael | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2022 |
| Bokor, Michael | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2022 |
| Bokor, Michael | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2022 |
| Bokor, Michael | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2020 |
| Ford, Albert | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/12/2021 |
| Ford, Albert | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/12/2021 |
| Greenwald, Michael | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/01/2019 |
| Ivey, Meredith | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/01/2023 |
| Ivey, Meredith | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/01/2023 |
| MFC Inman Property LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2025 |
All 15 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Golden Age Operations | 0.3 mi | Inman, SC | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Lake Emory Post Acute Care | 0.9 mi | Inman, SC | ★☆☆☆☆ | 2/5 | abuse |
| Magnolia Manor - Inman | 0.9 mi | Inman, SC | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | SFF |
| Rosecrest Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center | 3.7 mi | Inman, SC | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Valley Falls Terrace | 7.0 mi | Spartanburg, SC | ★★★☆☆ | 4/5 | |
| Physical Rehabilitation and Wellness Center of Spa | 8.7 mi | Spartanburg, SC | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
| Spartanburg Hospital for Restorative Care SNF | 10.5 mi | Spartanburg, SC | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Magnolia Manor - Spartanburg | 10.6 mi | Spartanburg, SC | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| White Oak Manor - Spartanburg | 10.6 mi | Spartanburg, SC | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Chandler Creek Post Acute | 10.7 mi | Greer, SC | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| White Oak at North Grove INC | 11.4 mi | Spartanburg, SC | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Summit Hills Skilled Nursing Facility | 12.2 mi | Spartanburg, SC | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
CMS records place this facility in Spartanburg, SC — 15 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 425122.
This page is the printable visit checklist. If your browser did not open the print dialog automatically, use File → Print (Ctrl/⌘-P).
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details