Imperial, a Villa Center
26505 Powers Avenue, Dearborn Heights, MI 48125 · Wayne County · 265 certified beds · avg 224 residents/day · certified since Mar 13, 1992
Part of chain: VILLA HEALTHCARE (18 facilities, chain avg rating 2.8★)
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 2/5
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.
Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)
▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Oct 23, 2025 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.
Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.
Corrected: Oct 29, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
▲ Actual harm, one-off · May 14, 2025 · F-0684 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Why it matters: Care that strays from doctor's orders or ignores the resident's wishes can lead to declining health and avoidable harm.
Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.
Corrected: May 28, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
All citations in the current public record (38)
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 23, 2026 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not honor residents' right to make their own choices about their daily lives, such as when to wake up, what to eat, or how to spend their time. |
| Apr 23, 2026 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide required paperwork or notices about a resident's needs, their right to appeal a transfer or discharge, or the facility's bed-hold policy (how long a bed is saved during a hospital stay). |
| Apr 23, 2026 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. |
| Apr 23, 2026 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility used feeding tubes without a valid medical reason or the resident's agreement, or did not provide proper care to residents who have feeding tubes. |
| Apr 23, 2026 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not safely and appropriately administer IV fluids (fluids given through a vein) for residents who needed them. |
| Apr 23, 2026 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it. · from a complaint |
| Apr 23, 2026 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not have enough nursing staff each day to meet every resident's needs, or did not have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift. Adequate staffing is one of the strongest predictors of good care. |
| Dec 16, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint |
| Oct 23, 2025 | ▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-off | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint |
| Jul 29, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint |
| Jul 29, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide safe, appropriate care for residents who need dialysis — the treatment that filters the blood when kidneys fail. · from a complaint |
| May 14, 2025 | ▲ G · Actual harm, one-off | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint |
| Feb 26, 2025 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups. · from a complaint |
| Feb 26, 2025 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not keep its building and grounds safe, functional, clean, and comfortable for residents, staff, and visitors. · from a complaint |
| Feb 26, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · from a complaint |
| Feb 26, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not allow residents to take their own medications when a clinical review showed they could do so safely. Residents have this right if their care team determines it's appropriate. · from a complaint |
| Feb 26, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · from a complaint |
| Feb 26, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint |
| Feb 26, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · from a complaint |
| Feb 26, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · from a complaint |
| Feb 26, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint |
| May 30, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature. · from a complaint |
| Feb 14, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint |
| Dec 13, 2023 | F · Potential for harm, facility-wide | The facility did not keep its building and grounds safe, functional, clean, and comfortable for residents, staff, and visitors. · from a complaint |
| Dec 13, 2023 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · from a complaint |
| Dec 13, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups. · from a complaint |
| Dec 13, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not honor residents' right to make their own choices about their daily lives, such as when to wake up, what to eat, or how to spend their time. |
| Dec 13, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · from a complaint |
| Dec 13, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint |
| Dec 13, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. |
| Dec 13, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline. |
| Dec 13, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint |
| Dec 13, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits. |
| Dec 13, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. |
| Dec 13, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint |
| Aug 30, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · from a complaint |
| Aug 30, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint |
| Aug 30, 2023 | C · Minimal risk, facility-wide | The facility did not keep its building and grounds safe, functional, clean, and comfortable for residents, staff, and visitors. · from a complaint |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (9 → 7).
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 15 | 0 | F |
| 2024 | 2 | 0 | D |
| 2025 | 14 | 2 | J ▲ |
| 2026 | 7 | 0 | D |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
2 fines totaling $29,760.
| Date | Type | Amount / length |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 23, 2025 | Fine | $9,360 |
| Oct 23, 2025 | Fine | $20,400 |
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
| Measure | This facility | Michigan avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.94 | 4.32 | 3.95 | bottom 38% in Michigan; top 42% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.40 | 0.84 | 0.69 | bottom 10% in Michigan; bottom 21% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 3.66 | 3.79 | 3.50 | top 45% in Michigan; top 35% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.27 | 0.49 | 0.48 | bottom 21% in Michigan; bottom 25% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 46.6 | 44.1 | 45.8 | bottom 42% in Michigan; bottom 46% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 38.9 | 39.2 | 42.9 | bottom 48% in Michigan; top 45% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.52, RN 0.35, weekend 3.27. Staffing rating: 3/5.
Self-reported quality measures
Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.
Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5
Who owns this facility
For profit - Individual
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Omnia Opco Holdings LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 100% | 07/01/2023 |
| Aaron, Jonathan | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2023 |
| Aaron, Jonathan | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2023 |
| Baumol, Yehoshua | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2023 |
| Berger, Menachem | Individual | Individual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/22/2025 |
| Farmer, Patrice | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/18/2020 |
| Farmer, Patrice | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/18/2020 |
| Graf, Marcella | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2023 |
| Graf, Marcella | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2023 |
| Israel, Benjamin | Individual | Individual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/08/2025 |
| Kroll, Gabriel | Individual | Individual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/08/2025 |
| Nagel, Steven | Individual | Individual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/08/2025 |
| Omnia Healthcare Group LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2023 |
| Singerman, Joseph | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/25/2025 |
| Singerman, Joseph | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/25/2025 |
| Stern, Todd | Individual | Individual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/08/2025 |
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
- "How do you make sure each resident's care follows the doctor's orders, and what changed after this citation?"
- "What choices do residents have over their daily schedule, like meal times, bathing, and activities?"
- "What written notices do we get before any transfer or discharge, and what is your bed-hold policy?"
- "How do you decide when a feeding tube is truly needed, and how do staff care for residents who have one?"
- "Who on your staff manages IV therapy, and what training and monitoring is in place?"
- "How do you assess and manage residents' pain, especially for those who have trouble communicating?"
- "What is your nurse and aide staffing ratio on each shift, including nights and weekends?"
- "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
- "Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"
Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Orchards at Wayne | 3.3 mi | Wayne, MI | ★☆☆☆☆ | 2/5 | abuse |
| Maple Manor Rehab Center | 3.3 mi | Wayne, MI | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Optalis Health and Rehabilitation of Dearborn Heig | 3.8 mi | Dearborn Heights, MI | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Pine Creek Manor Skilled Nursing & Rehab Center | 4.0 mi | Wayne, MI | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Regency, a Villa Center | 4.3 mi | Taylor, MI | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Optalis Health and Rehabilitation of Allen Park | 4.4 mi | Allen Park, MI | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Medilodge of Taylor | 4.5 mi | Taylor, MI | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| The Lodge at Taylor | 4.6 mi | Taylor, MI | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Riverside Commons Rehab and Nursing Center, LLC | 5.7 mi | Dearborn, MI | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Four Chaplains Nursing Care Center | 5.8 mi | Westland, MI | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Regency at Westland | 6.6 mi | Westland, MI | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Cherry Hill for Nursing and Rehabilitation | 6.6 mi | Westland, MI | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
All facilities in Dearborn Heights →
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 235514.