How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
Huntersville Health & Rehabilitation Center
13835 Boren Street, Huntersville, NC 28078 (opens Google Maps) · Mecklenburg County · (704) 912-2222· 90 certified beds · avg 87 residents/day · certified since Jun 27, 2016 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Abuse citation flag (CMS)
Part of chain: LIFEWORKS REHAB (64 facilities, chain avg rating 2.1★)
The abuse flag means inspectors cited this facility for abuse that caused harm to a resident within the past year, or potential for harm in each of the last two years. Source: CMS.
2/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
inspected Jun 12, 2026
3
Serious findings on record
most recent Apr 23, 2026
$0
Fines, last 3 years
3.35
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)
Every record stays on this page.
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Apr 23, 2026 · F-0600 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Apr 23, 2026 · F-0600 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.
Why it matters: Abuse and neglect cause direct physical and emotional harm and are among the most serious failures a nursing home can have.
Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Jun 12, 2026 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Apr 23, 2026 · F-0604 · triggered by a complaint
The facility used physical restraints — devices that limit a resident's movement — when they weren't needed for medical treatment.
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Apr 23, 2026 · F-0604 · triggered by a complaint
The facility used physical restraints — devices that limit a resident's movement — when they weren't needed for medical treatment.
Why it matters: Unneeded restraints can cause injuries, muscle loss, and deep emotional distress.
Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Jun 12, 2026 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Apr 23, 2026 · F-0607 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft. These written safeguards are the foundation of resident protection.
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Apr 23, 2026 · F-0607 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft. These written safeguards are the foundation of resident protection.
Why it matters: Without working prevention policies, mistreatment is more likely to happen and less likely to be caught.
Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Jun 12, 2026 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
Inspection findings in the public record
Showing the latest 3 of 14 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not allow residents to take their own medications when a clinical review showed they could do so safely. Residents have this right if their care team determines it's appropriate. F-0554
The facility did not coordinate resident assessments with the state's pre-admission screening program for mental illness and intellectual disabilities, or failed to refer residents for the special services they need. F-0644
The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint F-0600
View all 14 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 12, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not allow residents to take their own medications when a clinical review showed they could do so safely. Residents have this right if their care team determines it's appropriate. · F-0554 |
| Jun 12, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not coordinate resident assessments with the state's pre-admission screening program for mental illness and intellectual disabilities, or failed to refer residents for the special services they need. · F-0644 |
| Apr 23, 2026 | ▲ G · Actual harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint · F-0600 |
| Apr 23, 2026 | ▲ G · Actual harm, isolated | The facility used physical restraints — devices that limit a resident's movement — when they weren't needed for medical treatment. · from a complaint · F-0604 |
| Apr 23, 2026 | ▲ G · Actual harm, isolated | The facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft. These written safeguards are the foundation of resident protection. · from a complaint · F-0607 |
| May 7, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not make sure a transfer or discharge met the resident's needs and preferences, or did not properly prepare the resident to leave safely. · from a complaint · F-0627 |
| May 7, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not coordinate resident assessments with the state's pre-admission screening program for mental illness and intellectual disabilities, or failed to refer residents for the special services they need. · F-0644 |
| May 7, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe, appropriate care for residents who need dialysis — the treatment that filters the blood when kidneys fail. · F-0698 |
| May 7, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Oct 2, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint · F-0880 |
| Jan 25, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Jan 25, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not run an ongoing quality assurance committee that reviews care problems and creates plans to fix them. · F-0867 |
| Jan 25, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide food that accounts for each resident's allergies, intolerances, and personal preferences, or did not offer appealing alternatives. · F-0806 |
| Jan 25, 2024 | B · Potential for minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · F-0842 |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (3 → 2).
All citationsSerious citations (G–L)
2024
All citations: 5
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2025
All citations: 4
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2026
All citations: 5
Serious citations (G–L): 3
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 5 | 0 | E |
| 2025 | 4 | 0 | D |
| 2026 | 5 | 3 | G ▲ |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
What these staffing numbers mean →
This facilityNorth Carolina averageU.S. average
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)
This facility: 3.35
North Carolina average: 4.01
U.S. average: 3.95
Registered Nurse hours
This facility: 0.65
North Carolina average: 0.64
U.S. average: 0.69
Weekend total nurse staffing
This facility: 2.97
North Carolina average: 3.56
U.S. average: 3.50
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | North Carolina avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.35 | 4.01 | 3.95 | bottom 24% in North Carolina; bottom 29% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.65 | 0.64 | 0.69 | top 32% in North Carolina; top 42% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 2.97 | 3.56 | 3.50 | bottom 24% in North Carolina; bottom 29% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.52 | 0.41 | 0.48 | top 22% in North Carolina; top 30% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 50.0 | 49.0 | 45.8 | bottom 48% in North Carolina; bottom 38% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 38.9 | 45.7 | 42.9 | top 39% in North Carolina; top 45% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.91, RN 0.76, weekend 3.46.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.91 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 3/5.
Quality measures: assessments & claims
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5
Costs & payment
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Huntersville Health & Rehabilitation Center. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Calculate a stay from a quote you receive
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Before you compare prices
- Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
- Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
- Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
Who owns this facility
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Charles 1994 Family Grantor Trust | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 05/28/2021 |
| CK 2008 Family Trust | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 05/28/2021 |
| DRM South LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 05/28/2021 |
| Edward 1998 Family Grantor Trust | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 05/28/2021 |
| Huntersville Holdings I LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 100% | 05/28/2021 |
| Lauren 2020 Family Grantor Trust | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 05/28/2021 |
| Lauren 2020 LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 05/28/2021 |
| Leps 2003 Family Trust | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 05/28/2021 |
| Norman 5571 & Family LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 05/28/2021 |
| Norman 5571 Family Grantor Trust | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 05/28/2021 |
| Norman 5571 LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 05/28/2021 |
| RL 2008 Family Trust | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 05/28/2021 |
| Robin 2008 Family Grantor Trust | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 05/28/2021 |
| Robin 2008 LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 05/28/2021 |
| Saul 2012 Family Grantor Trust | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 05/28/2021 |
| Springrock South LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 05/28/2021 |
| Summer South LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 05/28/2021 |
| Gardin, William | Individual | W-2 Managing Employee | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/11/2023 |
| RSBRM South Manager LLC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/28/2021 |
All 19 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.
Other facilities in the same chain
CMS lists this facility under the chain Lifeworks Rehab — 64 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
- King Health and Rehabilitation Center — King, NC · overall 3/5
- Lenoir Health and Rehabilitation Center — Lenoir, NC · overall 1/5
- Lexington Health Care Center — Lexington, NC · overall 2/5abuse
- Litchford Falls Health and Rehabilitation Center — Raleigh, NC · overall 2/5
- Oxford Health and Rehabilitation Center — Oxford, NC · overall 1/5
- University Health and Rehabilitation Center — Durham, NC · overall 1/5
- Luther Woods Nursing and Rehabilitation Center — Hatboro, PA · overall 3/5
- Albemarle Health & Rehabilitation Center — Charlottesville, VA · overall 2/5
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 63 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "Tell me about this abuse or neglect citation — what happened, and what specific changes did you make afterward?"
- "What is your policy on physical restraints, and what alternatives do you try first?"
- "What specific steps do you take to prevent abuse and neglect, and how are staff trained on them?"
- "If my family member is able to manage their own medications, would you allow it, and how is that decided?"
- "How do you identify and arrange specialized services for residents with mental health conditions or disabilities?"
- "Before a resident is discharged or transferred, how do you make sure the new place can actually meet their needs?"
- "How do you coordinate and monitor care for residents who receive dialysis?"
- "Who leads your infection prevention program, and how do you make sure staff follow practices like hand hygiene every day?"
Also worth asking anywhere
- "Your weekend nurse staffing is reported below the North Carolina midpoint — how does the weekend schedule differ from a weekday?"
- "Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
- "CMS reports 50% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
- "The ownership record on file lists 19 owning or managing parties — who makes the decisions about staffing levels?"
- "Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"
Nearby facilities (12 closest of 39 within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lakeside Health & Rehab Center | 1.2 mi | Huntersville, NC | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Huntersville Oaks | 1.5 mi | Huntersville, NC | ★★★☆☆ | 4/5 | |
| Autumn Care of Cornelius | 5.0 mi | Cornelius, NC | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Rockwell Park Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center | 8.7 mi | Charlotte, NC | —/5 | SFF | |
| University Place Nursing and Rehabilitation Center | 8.8 mi | Charlotte, NC | ★☆☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Crown Haven Health and Rehabilitation | 10.0 mi | Charlotte, NC | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Charlotte Health & Rehabilitation Center | 10.2 mi | Charlotte, NC | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Glenwood Health & Rehabilitation | 12.1 mi | Mooresville, NC | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Pine Crest Health & Rehabilitation | 12.3 mi | Charlotte, NC | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| The Gardens of Taylor Glen Retirement Community | 12.3 mi | Concord, NC | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Crestview Health & Rehabilitation | 12.7 mi | Mooresville, NC | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | SFF |
| Stanley Total Living Center | 12.8 mi | Stanley, NC | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
Other facilities in the same county
CMS records place this facility in Mecklenburg, NC — 29 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
- Matthews Health & Rehab Center — Matthews, NC · overall 2/5
- Mecklenburg Heath and Rehabilitation — Charlotte, NC · overall 5/5
- Novant Health Presbyterian Medical Center-Snu — Charlotte, NC · overall 5/5
- Pavilion Health Center at Brightmore — Charlotte, NC · overall 2/5
- Peak Resources - Charlotte — Charlotte, NC · overall 3/5
- Pelican Health at Charlotte — Charlotte, NC · overall 2/5SFF
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 345570.
This page is the printable visit checklist. If your browser did not open the print dialog automatically, use File → Print (Ctrl/⌘-P).