How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
115 White Road, King, NC 27021 (opens Google Maps) · Stokes County · (336) 983-6505· 96 certified beds · avg 91 residents/day · certified since Nov 11, 1993 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: LIFEWORKS REHAB (64 facilities, chain avg rating 2.1★)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Showing the latest 3 of 11 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint F-0880
The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. F-0812
The facility did not coordinate resident assessments with the state's pre-admission screening program for mental illness and intellectual disabilities, or failed to refer residents for the special services they need. F-0644
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 24, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint · F-0880 |
| Apr 16, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Apr 16, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not coordinate resident assessments with the state's pre-admission screening program for mental illness and intellectual disabilities, or failed to refer residents for the special services they need. · F-0644 |
| Apr 16, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| Apr 16, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. · from a complaint · F-0690 |
| Apr 16, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility used feeding tubes without a valid medical reason or the resident's agreement, or did not provide proper care to residents who have feeding tubes. · F-0693 |
| Apr 16, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · F-0755 |
| Apr 16, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| Feb 29, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents from misuse of their belongings or money — this is called misappropriation, and it includes theft or improper use of a resident's property or funds. · from a complaint · F-0602 |
| Jan 24, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| Jan 24, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not run an ongoing quality assurance committee that reviews care problems and creates plans to fix them. · F-0867 |
Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (7 → 1).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 3 | 0 | D |
| 2025 | 7 | 0 | E |
| 2026 | 1 | 0 | D |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | North Carolina avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 2.66 | 4.01 | 3.95 | bottom 1% in North Carolina; bottom 6% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.33 | 0.64 | 0.69 | bottom 12% in North Carolina; bottom 13% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 2.45 | 3.56 | 3.50 | bottom 2% in North Carolina; bottom 8% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.37 | 0.41 | 0.48 | top 40% in North Carolina; bottom 46% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 59.8 | 49.0 | 45.8 | bottom 24% in North Carolina; bottom 17% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 28.6 | 45.7 | 42.9 | top 21% in North Carolina; top 26% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 2.98, RN 0.37, weekend 2.74.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (2.98 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 1/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for King Health and Rehabilitation Center. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Limited Liability company
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bridgewater NC Holdings LLC | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2024 |
| HL Family Trust | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2024 |
| HSHC 2024 Family Trust | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2024 |
| Ib Mimi 2022 Family Grantor Trust | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2024 |
| Ib Mimi 2022 Family Trust | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2024 |
| JK 2022 Grantor Family Trust | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2024 |
| King Holdings I LLC | Organization | Direct Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2024 |
| Milano Family Holdings LLC | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2024 |
| ML Milano 2022 Family Grantor Trust | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2024 |
| ML Milano 2022 Family Trust | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2024 |
| TJ Family Trust | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2024 |
| Tol Opco Investco LLC | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2024 |
| Uh Carolina SNF Operations Holdings LLC | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2024 |
| Universal Operations Holdings LLC | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2024 |
| Will Family 2016 Trust | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2024 |
| 115 White Road LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2024 |
| Acs Pro Global Solutions | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2024 |
| Bridgewater NC Holdings LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2024 |
| Burton, Noah | Individual | Trustee of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2024 |
| Cyop Cyber Security LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2024 |
Showing 20 of 43 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 23 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.
CMS lists this facility under the chain Lifeworks Rehab — 64 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 63 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Village Care of King | 1.2 mi | King, NC | ★☆☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Oak Forest Health and Rehabilitation | 8.7 mi | Winston Salem, NC | ★☆☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Mill Creek Center for Nursing and Rehabilitation | 9.7 mi | Winston-Salem, NC | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Salemtowne | 9.7 mi | Winston-Salem, NC | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Brookridge Retirement Community | 10.8 mi | Winston-Salem, NC | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Stokes County Nursing Home | 12.2 mi | Danbury, NC | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Walnut Cove Health and Rehabilitation | 12.7 mi | Walnut Cove, NC | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Arbor Acres United Methodist Retirement Community | 13.3 mi | Winston Salem, NC | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Willow Valley Center for Nursing and Rehabilitatio | 14.1 mi | Winston-Salem, NC | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
| The Oaks | 14.9 mi | Winston-Salem, NC | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Trinity Glen | 15.0 mi | Winston-Salem, NC | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Silas Creek Rehabilitation Center | 15.1 mi | Winston Salem, NC | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 |
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 345449.
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details