How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
401 Arnold Street N.E., Cullman, AL 35055 (opens Google Maps) · Cullman County · (256) 739-4409· 102 certified beds · avg 94 residents/day · certified since Jun 18, 1998 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: VENZA CARE MANAGEMENT (25 facilities, chain avg rating 2.4★)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5 · how star ratings work →
⚠ The most recent standard health inspection was more than 2 years ago — conditions may have changed.
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Showing the latest 3 of 12 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. F-0812
The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. F-0880
The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. F-0656
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 26, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Sep 26, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Aug 23, 2018 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| Aug 23, 2018 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| Aug 23, 2018 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · F-0842 |
| Aug 23, 2018 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Sep 7, 2017 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not let residents take part in planning or updating their own care. Residents (and their families or representatives) have the right to help decide how they are cared for. · F-0280 |
| Sep 7, 2017 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent avoidable accidents like falls. · F-0323 |
| Sep 7, 2017 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not set up an ongoing quality committee that meets at least quarterly to review problems in care and create plans to fix them. This internal group is how a facility is supposed to catch and correct its own shortcomings. · F-0520 |
| Sep 7, 2017 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide adequate housekeeping and maintenance to keep the building clean, orderly, and in good repair. · F-0253 |
| Sep 7, 2017 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not create a complete written plan of care covering all of a resident's needs, with clear goals, deadlines, and steps whose progress can be measured. · F-0279 |
| Sep 7, 2017 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility gave residents urinary catheters when they weren't medically necessary, or failed to give residents with bladder control problems the care needed to prevent urinary tract infections and help restore normal bladder function. · F-0315 |
Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (4 → 2).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 | 6 | 0 | F |
| 2018 | 4 | 0 | D |
| 2019 | 2 | 0 | D |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Alabama avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 4.25 | 4.43 | 3.95 | bottom 38% in Alabama; top 30% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.75 | 0.74 | 0.69 | top 43% in Alabama; top 31% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 3.64 | 3.73 | 3.50 | bottom 43% in Alabama; top 36% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.48 | 0.36 | 0.48 | top 19% in Alabama; top 35% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 50.4 | 46.9 | 45.8 | bottom 40% in Alabama; bottom 36% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 23.1 | 39.5 | 42.9 | top 22% in Alabama; top 18% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.08, RN 0.72, weekend 3.49.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (4.08 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 4/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Folsom Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Al SNF Associates LLC | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/25/2026 |
| Al SNF Associates Trust | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/25/2026 |
| Al SNF Holdings LLC | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/25/2026 |
| Al SNF Holdings Trust | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/25/2026 |
| Alabama SNF Operations Holdings LLC | Organization | Direct Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/24/2023 |
| CH Alabama Holdings LLC | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/25/2026 |
| CW Alabama Holdings LLC | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/25/2026 |
| M Melb Opco LLC | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/01/2025 |
| M Melb Opco Trust | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/01/2025 |
| Ms Alabama Holdings LLC | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/01/2025 |
| S Melb Opco LLC | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/01/2025 |
| S Melb Opco Trust | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/01/2025 |
| SS Alabama Holdings LLC | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/24/2026 |
| Alabama Opco Manager LLC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/24/2023 |
| Goodman, Menucha | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/01/2025 |
| Goodman, Menucha | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/01/2025 |
| Goodman, Menucha | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/01/2025 |
| Huggins, David | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/26/2023 |
| Huggins, David | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/26/2023 |
| Melb Opco Manager LLC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/01/2025 |
Showing 20 of 25 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 5 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.
CMS lists this facility under the chain Venza Care Management — 25 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 24 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cullman Health Care Center | 1.3 mi | Cullman, AL | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Woodland Village Rehabilitation and Healthcare Cen | 1.6 mi | Cullman, AL | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Hanceville Nursing & Rehab Center, INC | 8.8 mi | Hanceville, AL | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Falkville Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center | 14.0 mi | Falkville, AL | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | SFF |
| Summerford Health and Rehab, LLC | 15.1 mi | Falkville, AL | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 |
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 015437.
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details